Apple, Foxconn, and Corporate Social Responsibility in China
This paper examines the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) failures surrounding Apple's manufacturing partnership with Foxconn in China. Drawing on investigative reporting and audit data, the paper documents worker suicides, illegal overtime, inhumane dormitory conditions, and public-humiliation disciplinary practices at Foxconn's Shenzhen and Chengdu plants. It contrasts Foxconn's stated ethical commitments with on-the-ground realities reported by workers and NGO investigators, and evaluates Apple's response — including internal audits and engagement with the Fair Labour Association. The paper argues that Apple's continued partnership with Foxconn is incompatible with genuine CSR principles and concludes that Apple should sever ties with Foxconn and return its manufacturing operations to the United States.
- Introduction to Corporate Social Responsibility: CSR defined and Apple-Foxconn thesis introduced
- Foxconn, Apple, and Chinese Employees: Worker suicides and exploitation reports emerge
- Working Conditions and Worker Suicides at Foxconn: Illegal overtime, dormitory conditions, and abuse documented
- Foxconn's Response and Official Statements: Company denials and PR claims versus reality
- Apple's Response and Supplier Audits: Apple audits reveal widespread supplier non-compliance
- Conclusion: The Case for Ending the Apple–Foxconn Relationship: Argument for severing ties and reshoring manufacturing
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its argument in a well-recognized framework — the EU definition of CSR — before applying that framework to a specific, high-profile case, giving the critique intellectual structure.
- It uses direct worker testimony alongside corporate statements and audit data, creating a compelling contrast between Foxconn's public relations claims and documented reality.
- The conclusion connects CSR principles to a concrete policy recommendation (reshoring manufacturing), tying the argument back to its opening framework in a satisfying way.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the use of source contrast — systematically quoting corporate self-descriptions (from Foxconn's website and Apple's official statements) and then juxtaposing them with contradictory evidence from investigative journalism and NGO reports. This technique exposes the gap between stated values and actual practice, which is the core argumentative move in applied ethics writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a conceptual introduction to CSR and a clear thesis. It then presents factual evidence across several body sections organized by topic: working conditions, worker suicides, company responses, and audit findings. Each section builds the evidentiary case before the conclusion delivers a direct policy argument. The structure follows a classic claim–evidence–implication pattern appropriate for an undergraduate ethics or business course paper.
Introduction to Corporate Social Responsibility
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a concept and a movement that many companies worldwide are embracing. It relates to positive actions that go above and beyond the legal and financial duties of a company. CSR pertains to the social and environmental concerns of the community in which a given company operates, as well as the communities linked to that company. Moreover, when a company reaches out to the community and involves its workers in the betterment of that community — through volunteerism and other acts of generosity — CSR becomes a winning idea for the company's stakeholders, including customers, employees, board members, and shareholders.
According to the European Union's definition of Corporate Social Responsibility, one of the key goals is to "identify, prevent and mitigate possible adverse impacts which enterprises may have on society" (europa.eu). This paper focuses on the seriously adverse impacts related to the Foxconn company, which manufactures technology products for Apple in China. It takes the position that the terrible track record Foxconn has demonstrated cannot be sustained, and that Apple should sever its relationship with Foxconn and bring its manufacturing operations back to the United States.
Foxconn, Apple, and Chinese Employees
Because the internationally accepted values of CSR have been so widely accepted and, in many cases, practiced, it was something of a shock when news stories began to emerge pointing out serious and troubling problems with Foxconn's operations in China. Americans and other technology consumers around the world have been presented with a positive image of Apple products, and Apple was recently named the wealthiest technology corporation in the world — larger than IBM and other major corporations. However, an article in The Guardian (Chamberlain, 2011) reports that a "spate of suicides" occurred at the Foxconn plant in Shenzhen, China. In May 2010, seven young Chinese workers who were building Apple iPads for consumers worldwide took their own lives.
What caused the serious emotional and psychological distress that drove these workers to suicide? And how could a technology giant like Apple allow a subcontractor to treat employees so inhumanely? If these allegations are true, they are unconscionable and outrageous. The article mentions an investigation conducted by two non-governmental organizations (NGOs), which reported that workers at the Foxconn plant were being "exploited" and were living "a dismal life" (Chamberlain, p. 1). In addition, Chamberlain reports that nine Chinese sociologists sent an "open letter to the media" calling for an end to "regimented and restrictive work practices." According to the letter, "fundamental human dignity" was being "sacrificed" for the production of Apple technologies such as iPhones and iPads.
Works Cited
Al Jazeera. (2012). Apple admits some suppliers overworking staff. Retrieved February 20, 2012, from EBSCOHost.com.
Chamberlain, Gethin. (2011). Apple's Chinese workers treated 'inhumanely, like machines'. The Guardian. Retrieved February 20, 2012, from http://guardian.co.uk.
Chamberlain, Gethin. (2011). Apple factories accused of exploiting Chinese workers. The Guardian. Retrieved February 20, 2012, from http://www.guardian.co.uk.
European Union. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility: A new definition, a new agenda for action. Retrieved February 20, 2012, from http://europa.eu.
Foxconn. (2011). About Foxconn. Retrieved February 20, 2012, from http://www.foxconn.com/ManageConcept.html.
Foxconn. (2011). Social and Environmental Responsibility. Retrieved February 20, 2012, from http://www.foxconn.com/policy_3.html.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.