Skip to main content
Essay Undergraduate 1,318 words

Business Ethics: Resolving Ethical Dilemmas in the Workplace

~7 min read
Abstract

This paper examines ethical dilemmas in a business context, analyzing two hypothetical scenarios alongside a real-world case involving disclosure of sensitive information during contract negotiations. The paper argues that many perceived moral dilemmas arise from imperfect information or faulty framing rather than genuine ethical conflict. Using the example of Fermata Entertainment's Binta Niambi Brown, the paper contrasts consequentialist and deontological approaches to ethical decision-making. It concludes that deontological ethics often provides a more reliable framework for business decisions, particularly when the consequences of an action are difficult to predict, and that clear organizational guidelines can help employees navigate morally ambiguous situations.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction to Ethical Dilemmas in Business: Defines ethical dilemmas and their business context
  • Analyzing Two Business Ethics Scenarios: Examines two hypothetical ethical dilemma scenarios
  • A Real-World Ethical Dilemma: The Fermata Entertainment Case: Real case study of disclosure dilemma in negotiations
  • Consequentialism vs. Deontological Ethics: Contrasts two ethical frameworks using Brown's case
  • Applying Deontological Ethics to Brown's Decision: Analyzes how deontology guided Brown's final choice
  • Takeaways for Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: Lessons and recommendations for corporate ethics practice
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples

What makes this paper effective

  • It grounds abstract ethical theory in concrete, relatable scenarios, making frameworks like consequentialism and deontological ethics accessible to a general academic audience.
  • It uses a real-world business case (Fermata Entertainment) to bridge hypothetical analysis and practical application, giving the argument credibility and specificity.
  • The paper acknowledges complexity and limits of each ethical framework rather than advocating simplistically for one, demonstrating analytical maturity.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper effectively employs comparative ethical analysis — presenting two competing frameworks (consequentialism and deontological ethics) and evaluating each against the same case study. This technique allows the writer to show not just what a decision was, but why one framework proved more useful under conditions of uncertainty, which is a hallmark of applied ethics writing.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens by defining ethical dilemmas, then works through two hypothetical business scenarios before pivoting to a real-world case study. The middle sections apply and contrast the two major ethical theories. The conclusion synthesizes lessons for organizational practice. This inductive structure — from definition to example to theory to application — is well-suited for an undergraduate business ethics essay.

Introduction to Ethical Dilemmas in Business

An ethical dilemma is defined as a situation where "an agent has moral reasons for doing two different actions, but where doing both of those two actions is not possible" (McConnell, 2014). Businesses often find themselves in what they believe to be moral dilemmas, if only because of the way they are framing the issue. Not all dilemmas are genuine — some are driven by a lack of knowledge, imperfect information, or logical fallacies. Understanding how to identify and resolve authentic ethical dilemmas is therefore a critical competency for business professionals.

Analyzing Two Business Ethics Scenarios

In the first scenario, there is no genuine ethical dilemma for James. He perceives that he could jeopardize his security, yet ethics hotlines are intended to be anonymous. Furthermore, accounting fraud is a criminal activity, and the company stands to lose substantially if that fraud were discovered. James' fears are therefore irrational — as in the Enron case, once fraud is discovered, employees lose their jobs regardless. His only rational choice to preserve his future is to utilize the hotline or to otherwise report the irregularities.

In the second scenario, the company does face a dilemma, and it arises because of a lack of concrete information. The recall concept has emerged largely from the belief that the toy could bring harm to a child. This has yet to be proven — indeed, proving it would likely imply that a child has already been harmed — but at the same time, a company willingly losing money during its key holiday season over a perceived risk that may be overstated is not sound decision-making either. The company must learn more about the actual risk its toys pose to children rather than making a decision on a hypothetical, perceived risk. Facts make for good ethical decision-making; speculation does not.

In the real world, many companies face what they frame as ethical dilemmas when the underlying issue is actually one of public relations or incomplete information. When Apple faced controversy over Foxconn's labor practices, the controversy was driven largely by people who had never been inside a Foxconn factory, had never spoken with workers there, and had likely never visited China. They were applying Western contexts and values to a completely different company and culture. Apple was faced more with a public relations dilemma than a moral one, despite intensive media coverage (Bilton, 2014).

A Real-World Ethical Dilemma: The Fermata Entertainment Case

One genuine dilemma involves the disclosure of potentially damaging information. An instructive example comes from a company called Fermata Entertainment. An associate, Binta Niambi Brown, was closing a deal with a client when information surfaced that could potentially have scuttled the agreement (Giang, 2015). The senior partner was unavailable, so Brown was left to face the ethical dilemma alone. Revealing the information risked losing the deal, which would be damaging both to her company and to her career. However, not disclosing the information would essentially constitute a fraud on the client, who would be entering into an agreement under false pretenses. There is no specific legal guideline regarding the disclosure of information in private contract negotiations, making this a strictly moral dilemma.

The resolution came through honesty: Brown chose to reveal the information to the client. The client was still willing to proceed with the company. Deal negotiations continued, the issue was ultimately resolved, and an agreement was signed. Brown did not lose the deal, and her honesty paid dividends for years thereafter — both personally and for her organization.

3 locked sections · 660 words
Sign up to read the full analysis
Consequentialism vs. Deontological Ethics260 words
Brown's dilemma was essentially one that pitted the good of herself and her company against the good of the client. This is a different type of dilemma than, say, the first…
Applying Deontological Ethics to Brown's Decision180 words
Ultimately, Brown made the decision to disclose the information. This reflected a deontological interpretation of ethics — the choice she…
Takeaways for Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations220 words
There are a few critical takeaways from this examination of ethical dilemmas. The first is that such dilemmas often arise because of imperfect…
Read the full paper →
Plus 130,000+ examples & all writing tools
Key Concepts in This Paper
Ethical Dilemma Deontological Ethics Consequentialism Disclosure Obligation Moral Reasoning Corporate Guidelines Imperfect Information Whistleblowing Contract Negotiation Business Integrity
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Business Ethics: Resolving Ethical Dilemmas in the Workplace. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/business-ethics-resolving-ethical-dilemmas-2158174

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.