This paper examines Apple Inc.'s management strategy with a focus on sustaining its competitive advantage while addressing serious corporate social responsibility (CSR) challenges in its global supply chain. The paper reviews Apple's foundational digital hub strategy and the competitive landscape in consumer electronics, then proposes a revised vision and mission emphasizing social and environmental responsibility. Using a SMART framework, it establishes a zero human rights violation goal as a specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and timely objective. Finally, it outlines a three-phase implementation plan involving revised supplier contracts, employee education programs, and continuous on-site monitoring to hold suppliers such as Foxconn accountable for ethical and environmental standards.
The paper demonstrates the use of a structured strategic management framework (SMART objectives) applied to a CSR problem. Rather than making vague recommendations, it converts a broad ethical concern into a time-bound, measurable goal and then maps specific organizational actions—audit reform, supplier education, internal monitoring positions—onto that goal. This technique shows how business management papers link theoretical frameworks to practical implementation.
The paper is organized in three substantive parts: (1) a competitive context analysis covering Apple's history, the digital hub strategy, and market pressures; (2) a normative section proposing a revised vision and mission with a full SMART analysis; and (3) an implementation section detailing a phased action plan. References follow in a works-cited list. This three-part structure mirrors a classic strategic management report format: situational analysis, goal-setting, and execution planning.
Apple Inc. has had a long history of reinventing itself. The first Apple computers were built in a garage without any type of case, monitor, or keyboard. Despite these modest origins, demand for Apple grew exponentially. It was not long before Apple introduced the trademark Macintosh and then Mac OS X, which revolutionized the company. At this time, the company also dedicated much of its resources to aesthetics and further developing the Apple brand image through distinctive designs and intuitive features. This dedication to user-friendly design created generations of loyal customers who have fully embraced the Apple brand and championed its products. The digital hub strategy, which was responsible for the iPod, iPhone, and iPad, completely revolutionized the industry. Apple's competitive advantage is rooted in its ability to innovate and reinvent itself at every turn.
However, with the death of Steve Jobs and information surfacing publicly about challenges in the supply chain regarding social and environmental issues, Apple must again reinvent itself in order to maintain its position as the top technology company in the world. The new challenges the company faces are mainly a result of the high standard of innovation it has set, which creates a demanding bar to sustain. There are also challenges that stem from the fact that Apple outsources all of its production functions and has limited control over much of its operating procedures. Therefore, Apple must not only achieve a level of innovation that suits its growth trajectory, but must also do so in a sustainable and transparent manner that does not further damage its brand image in an increasingly complex and globalized world.
Apple is on a path to sustain and remain the foremost producer of consumer computers and consumer electronics around the world. The Apple strategy is built upon what is known as the "digital hub" strategy (Mortensen, 2010). This strategy has served as the foundation of the company's achievement over the last decade. The digital hub strategy envisions the personal computer as the central component of a much broader system that includes many accessories helping people be creative with their digital information (HP, 2012). The role of the personal computer is thus to serve as the hub of an array of devices that store digital content and serve different purposes. For example, a camera captures photos and an MP3 player holds music, yet both devices are generally reliant on a computer to transfer their digital content. It was from this concept that revolutionary products such as the iPod, iTunes, iPhone, and iPad were born.
In today's market, Apple faces fierce competition in the consumer electronics segment and various related industries. A number of companies offer similar products, often priced significantly lower than Apple's. Furthermore, as soon as Apple releases a new product, it is quickly replicated by competitors. Market pressure is perpetually applied by powerhouse companies such as IBM, Dell, HP, and Toshiba in the personal computer market (Wildstrom, 2009). In the cellular phone segment, Apple competes with companies like HTC, Palm, BlackBerry, and Motorola (Wortham, 2011). Apple has succeeded in competing with these companies despite commanding a market premium, owing to its design innovation and high quality standards.
Since Apple's market niche is heavily dependent on quality and innovation, it must constantly act boldly to be first to market. Any lapse in these areas could result in considerable loss of market share, which would devastate the company's current operating model and overall business strategy. To expedite time to market, Apple has outsourced its production operations to strategic partnerships overseas, most notably Foxconn in China. Foxconn operates world-class production facilities and maintains skilled labor widely regarded as among the best in the world. Foxconn can take a design and, in some cases within less than a week, establish a production operation capable of mass-producing Apple's products. Despite the sophistication Foxconn brings to manufacturing, this arrangement carries significant social costs that have degraded Apple's image in recent years.
Cases have arisen in the media about practices that Apple's suppliers use in manufacturing that have generated considerable negative publicity. Apple's main suppliers in China, which produce items such as the iPad and iPhone, have come under criticism for using child labor and violating employees' human rights (Moore, 2010). Additional negative reports have surfaced regarding Apple's suppliers violating environmental regulations in China, which are far less comprehensive than those in the developed world (Meyer, 2011).
Apple Inc. will lead the world in producing electronic products that are innovative and manufactured in the most socially and environmentally responsible way possible.
Apple Inc. will create innovative electronic products that revolutionize the way in which we live our lives by making the digital world more convenient, more useful, and more integrated with our daily lives.
The specific goals that Apple must achieve are to become the world's most sustainable and profitable electronics provider. Although Apple has a corporate social responsibility (CSR) message in place, it must do more to protect its image and add value to its products. As a result, Apple must achieve a zero human rights violation position in the very near future. To accomplish this, it will be necessary for Apple to become more integrated with its supply chain so that it can more closely monitor operations and ensure that no further ethical violations occur.
A zero human rights violation policy can serve as a measurable goal. Any documented human rights violation would clearly constitute a failure to achieve this goal. At present, Foxconn and other Apple suppliers exercise a great deal of autonomy over their operations. Apple must integrate with these suppliers to continuously monitor foreign operations. Currently, Apple does monitor its suppliers through audits and inspections; however, this strategy does not appear sufficient to prevent human rights violations.
A zero human rights violation goal is believed to be achievable, though it will require significant effort from Apple. Even though Apple conducts audits, suppliers are typically notified of audit dates in advance, which allows them to reorganize their operations to meet the terms of Apple's contractual agreements. Therefore, Apple must find better ways to hold its suppliers accountable without overly burdening their manufacturing capabilities.
Given the level of negative publicity that Apple's suppliers have generated, a renewed dedication to social and environmental responsibility is entirely relevant to Apple's overall strategy. Human rights and environmental violations have severely damaged Apple's brand image among some of its most loyal customers. To repair this damage, Apple will have to go above and beyond mere compliance measures to win back affected consumer segments.
It is in Apple's best interest to achieve its zero human rights and environmental violation policy as quickly as possible, while balancing this urgency with the feasibility of implementation. If Apple moves swiftly to integrate with its suppliers and ensures that no further violations occur, this goal should be attainable within one year. The schedule for this goal should therefore be set at a one-year time period, giving Apple sufficient opportunity to take the necessary steps to hold its suppliers accountable.
Apple must perpetually focus on quality and innovation to maintain its premium market position. However, achieving long-term success requires that these pursuits be balanced with genuine ethical accountability across its entire supply chain. By revising supplier contracts, investing in education, and implementing continuous monitoring, Apple can restore and strengthen its brand image while fulfilling its responsibility to workers and the environment. The path forward demands both strategic boldness and moral commitment—qualities that have always defined Apple at its best.
HP, 2012. A Creative Outlet for Mac's Digital Hub. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 11 February 2012].
Meyer, D., 2011. Can Apple Redeem Itself on Supply Chain Sustainability? Taking a Cue on Accountability from Nike's Playbook. [Online] Available at: http://valuestream2009.wordpress.com/2011/02/03/can-apple-redeem-itself-on-supply-chain-sustainability-taking-a-cue-on-accountability-from-nike%E2%80%99s-playbook/ [Accessed 11 February 2011].
Mick, J., 2010. Foxconn Installs Anti-Suicide Nets at its Facilities. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 11 February 2012].
Moore, M., 2010. Apple admits using child labor. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 11 February 2012].
Mortensen, P., 2010. The Dawn of Apple's Dominance: Digital Hub Strategy, Revisited. [Online] Available at: http://www.cultofmac.com/27810/the-dawn-of-apples-dominance-digital-hub-strategy-revisited/ [Accessed 12 February 2012].
Segall, L., 2012. 'Ethical iPhone' protests hit Apple stores. [Online] Available at: http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/09/technology/apple_foxconn_petition/ [Accessed 11 February 2012].
Wildstrom, S., 2009. Why Apple Leaves Low-End Computers to the Competition. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 11 February 2012].
Wortham, J., 2011. Before Latest Phone Debut, Apple Has Harsher Competition. [Online] Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/04/technology/apple-iPhone-faces-divided-loyalties.html [Accessed 11 February 2012].
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.