Social and Ethical Issues in Management: Epitech Case Study

Introduction: Epitech Technologies Background

Epitech is a technology company that creates and develops software for administrative use by other corporations. The company was founded in 2009 and has since grown to become one of the more recognized software technology companies in its region. Its headquarters are situated in the state of Virginia. The company is best known for its Omega software system, which is employed by numerous corporations for their everyday administrative needs.

Epitech was officially established on April 2, 2009, with the main intent of creating software for personal use. However, the company took a positive turn when the software it developed was adopted by other corporations, and it has since become one of the most sought-after software technology companies in its field. Five years after its inception, Epitech had produced software for over fifteen companies. The company intends to improve its standing to become one of the best institutions to work for — not only through providing a proper work environment for its employees, but also through ensuring that a guiding code of ethics is put in place.

Leadership can broadly be described as the process and practice of directing individuals toward the attainment of predefined objectives and goals. Throughout history, individuals have strived to attain leadership positions, and each person's leadership style has a significant bearing on how successfully an organization achieves its objectives. This is particularly true for individuals in key positions who are responsible for making decisions. In recent years, the concept of leadership has evolved as new information has been revealed and implemented. Among the fundamental styles discussed in the literature are situational, multifactor, and democratic leadership (Lester, 1975, p. 20).

Leadership Style and Team Selection

As the founder and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Epitech, my primary leadership approach combines a transactional style with a democratic, or participative, style of leadership. The democratic style encompasses stimulating personnel to participate in the decision-making process, ensuring that employees are well-informed about matters that influence their work, and sharing responsibility for problem-solving. Through this approach, I aim to promote open communication within the organization and encourage operational staff to participate in key decisions (Germano, 2010). This style distributes the burden of leadership and enables me, as CEO, to foster a sense of satisfaction and achievement as employees make progress in their daily responsibilities. Employees who feel they have a stake in the company tend to become more responsible and accountable for performance, resulting in greater productivity.

A transactional leader places major emphasis on maintaining the relationships generated within and outside the company, rather than primarily inspiring novelty and originality (Kuhnert & Lewis, 1987, p. 65). This is the style being employed at Epitech Technologies. It has numerous benefits in the sense that the strong relationships it cultivates create a synergy that is of great importance to the company. The leadership team remains keenly aware of its various stakeholders and focuses on the needs of workers, shareholders, and other interested parties.

Selecting leaders for an organization is a critical undertaking, as many companies spend minimal time choosing the right leaders and then spend far more time correcting the consequences of poor choices. Epitech Technologies employs a rigorous and fair selection process to ensure that all employees given leadership positions are well-suited for those roles. The first step involves clearly defining the qualities and characteristics of the ideal candidate by examining the open leadership position and determining exactly what the company is looking for. Required attributes include the ability to work collaboratively, critical thinking skills, and a passion for software development and programming — the core activity of Epitech Technologies.

Once these criteria are established, the selection process begins. Epitech first considers in-house employees for any open positions, as they already have a diverse understanding of the company's values and operations. If no current employees are best suited, or if positions outnumber suitable internal candidates, the company advertises externally. Applications are collected and compared against the minimum qualifications for each position. Candidates then proceed through three rounds of assessment: an online aptitude test, a timed in-premises aptitude test, and finally a panel interview evaluating passion, outlook, and alignment with the company's values. Epitech Technologies is committed to ensuring this process is fair and impartial, with the primary objective of selecting leaders who are fully in sync with what the company stands for (Goodall, 2007, p. 6).

Organizations are composed of workforces and can be understood as both social and financial entities. In large modern companies, it becomes challenging for employers and personnel to maintain constant direct contact. The formal system of an organization encompasses the authorized chain of command, channels of authority, and their corresponding spans of control. The informal system, by contrast, encompasses the ways in which official regulations are conveyed or modified through the unofficial practices of employees at lower levels. These two types of structure highlight the difference between processes and communications arranged by written guidelines and those that hinge on interpersonal interaction within workplace groups.

The formal system of Epitech takes a hierarchical structure. At the top level sits the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). The structure then branches out to the managers who head the various departments: the Human Resource Manager, responsible for employee welfare and recruitment; the Software Development (Information Technology) Manager, responsible for operations and software publication; and the Finance and Sales Manager, responsible for financial operations and product sales. Each manager is followed by their respective subordinates within each department.

The informal system of the company takes the form of a network in which all employees across various departments play an integral role in the company's success. Being a software company, it is important to recognize and appreciate the creativity that employees at every level bring. Accordingly, ideas forwarded by employees of all ranks are taken into consideration. This not only increases the level of effort and determination among employees but also ensures that they develop a sense of ownership over the company's progress.

In the formal system, the lowest-ranked employee has minimal formal impact on the company's operations and little contribution to the decision-making process. Key decisions are made by the top-ranking officials — the CEO and the heads of each department. The informal structure, by contrast, actively involves lower-ranked employees through networking and peer collaboration. This creates a synergy among staff that ultimately increases productivity and benefits the company as a whole.

According to Kruse (2012), employee engagement can be defined as the passionate and emotional commitment an employee has toward the company and its objectives. This form of commitment implies that engaged employees genuinely care about the welfare of both the company and their own work. Employee engagement has become a chief business concern for senior executives, who recognize that a highly productive and high-performing workforce is essential for organizational development and survival. Research by the Ethics Resource Center (2011, p. 38) found that higher levels of employee engagement also improve ethical behavior within an organization — seventy-two percent of engaged employees indicated they would be more likely to report an ethical violation, compared to fifty-five percent of weakly engaged or non-engaged employees.

Epitech plans to engage its employees through the following ten strategies:

1. Assigning Company Values. Epitech recognizes an employee each month — selected through a peer voting process — who has best demonstrated the company's values. That employee receives the "Employee of the Month" award along with a bonus. This encourages all employees to embody the organization's principles (Cook, 2008, p. 94).

Formal and Informal Organizational Systems

2. Personal Projects. Epitech offers tech employees one day per week to pursue their own individual projects. Allowing employees across departments to connect and exchange ideas provides fresh perspectives and stimulates creativity, which benefits overall productivity. This initiative also supports work-life balance (Cook, 2008, p. 107).

3. Letting Groups Create Their Own Values. Since most company tasks are performed in teams, Epitech allows each team to develop its own culture and working rules. Collaboration and team synergy are difficult to achieve quickly, but allowing teams to set their own norms helps accelerate effective project performance.

4. Empowering and Respecting Company Personnel. Epitech establishes respect as the foundation of every interaction across all departments. Employees are empowered to make individual decisions, which increases their accountability and sense of ownership. This approach is more effective than micromanagement (Cook, 2008, p. 143).

5. Encouraging Learning and Skills Development. The software industry is constantly evolving due to advances in information technology. Epitech supports employees in acquiring new skills in their respective fields. This not only motivates workers but ensures they remain well-prepared and increases their job satisfaction.

6. Mentoring. One of the most important aspects of employee engagement is fostering a sense of growth and belonging. Epitech does this by mentoring new and incoming employees, helping them feel part of a team and enabling them to learn the company's practices in a supportive manner (Cook, 2008, p. 185).

7. Encouraging Innovation and Recognizing Achievements. Employees are motivated when their hard work and achievements are recognized. Simple gestures such as saying "Good job" go a long way. Celebrating team milestones — such as the completion of a software program, which can take several months — brings teams together and reinforces their commitment (Albrecht, 2010, p. 383).

8. Increasing Benefits and Perks. Commitment to the company is enhanced by offering benefits and perks such as bonuses and competitive remuneration. These incentives increase employee engagement and loyalty (Garber, 2007, p. 35).

Employee Engagement Strategies

9. Reinforcing the Mission, Vision, and Values. It is important to regularly remind employees of what the company represents and why their work matters. As stakeholders of the organization, employees should feel that the company's mission and values are personally meaningful (Cook, 2008, p. 98).

10. Providing Required Resources. Employees are more committed when they have all the resources they need for their daily tasks. Epitech ensures that employees have access to the latest devices and tools optimal for their work, making jobs simpler and encouraging employees to invest their time and energy fully (Garber, 2007, p. 65).

In the present-day business and corporate world, ethics and accountability are key elements for any organization, whether multinational or small. While there are many public debates about how distinct accountabilities are defined and implemented in the marketplace, these ethical issues — whether opportunities or difficulties — can be foreseen and addressed before they become serious problems for any organization (Baker & Hart, 2008, p. 559).

Marketing ethics is one of the foreseeable ethical issues that may affect Epitech as a company. Marketing ethics concerns the values and standards that define conventional conduct in the marketplace (Ferrell, 2007, p. 1). Unethical marketing issues commonly arise from performance pressure and may include straightforward attempts to mislead or exploit a situation. All companies face substantial threats from ethical misconduct by employees and managers on a day-to-day basis (Ferrell, 2007, p. 2). Epitech must remain vigilant in ensuring that its marketing activities are truthful, fair, and compliant with applicable standards.

Due to constraints in time and money, software developers may be tempted to use pirated software copies or to violate software licensing agreements. In fact, a number of large global corporations have previously been found to be in violation of these rules. To address this, Epitech plans to take a proactive approach by publishing clear guidelines on appropriate software use. This publication will inform employees about the fines and penalties that both Epitech and individual employees may face if piracy occurs, as well as providing answers to commonly asked questions about proper software use (Garett & Lewis, 2010, p. 5).

This ethical issue arises when the company's developers or software engineers use open-source code in their own code without adequately crediting the original source. There are three distinct types of open-source code: licensed source code, copyrighted source code, and public domain code. Licensed source code is governed by a general public license that specifies how the software and its source code may be copied, distributed, or modified (Garett & Lewis, 2010, p. 7). Copyrighted source code may be openly published on a website with the author's consent, permitting developers to use it as long as the author is appropriately credited. Public domain code does not raise ethical concerns.

Epitech must be vigilant about this issue because programmers are often inclined to spend minimal time and resources on quality assurance, relying on the fact that they are not explicitly liable for harm resulting from their software provided they disclose this in the user agreement. However, this practice is unethical and can damage the company's brand (Garett & Lewis, 2010, p. 4). Ethical violations in this area can result in legal consequences such as civil lawsuits and financial penalties, as well as business consequences including reputational damage that adversely affects revenue.

Epitech plans to address this through several measures. First, the company will hire a compliance risk officer to ensure that all software licenses are used appropriately, as regulatory bodies can readily identify licensing violations (Garett & Lewis, 2010, p. 10). Legal consultations will be arranged for any arising issues to protect the company's reputation. Additionally, Epitech will ensure that all employees are well-informed about the ethical concerns surrounding the use of open-source code (Garett & Lewis, 2010, p. 10).

Epitech Technologies and its personnel adhere to four mandatory canons established by the company's code of ethics.

i. To ensure the safety and welfare of the community at all times.
ii. To be of diligent service to the principals of Epitech Technologies as well as to fellow employees.
iii. To follow the rules and regulations set by the company and to display ethical behavior at all times.

i. Protect the surrounding society, the nation, and the infrastructure in which the company operates.
ii. Act honorably at all times; be honest and just in all company activities and be responsible under the law.
iii. Employees are expected to offer hardworking and competent service to the executives and superiors of the company.
iv. Employees have a duty to develop and advance the profession of software development.

Conclusion, Areas for Improvement, and Personal Reflection

Harvard Business Review. (2013). The Impact of Employee Engagement on Performance. Harvard Business School Publishing.

Kruse, K. (2012). What is employee engagement? Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinkruse/2012/06/22/employee-engagement-what-and-why/

Lester, C. N. (1975). Leadership styles — a key to effectiveness. Journal of Extension. Retrieved from www.joe.org/joe/1975november/1975-6-a1.pdf

Rangan, K., Chase, L. A., & Karim, S. (2012). Why Every Company Needs a CSR Strategy and How to Build It. Harvard Business Review.

Reschke, M. (2014). Tim Cook: Changing the culture at Apple. TGAAP. Retrieved from

Singla, R. K. (2009). Business Management. Prince Print Process.

Stokyo, P. (2009). Organizational Culture and the Management of Organizational Memory. Canada School of Public Service.

Trevino, L., & Nelson, K. (2011). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk About How to Do It Right (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.