Social and Ethical Issues in Management: Epitech Case Study

Introduction: Epitech Technologies Background

Epitech is a technology company that creates and develops software for administrative use by other corporations. The company was founded in 2009 and has since grown to become one of the more recognized software technology companies in its region. Its headquarters are situated in the state of Virginia. The company is best known for its Omega software system, which is employed by numerous corporations for their everyday administrative needs.

Epitech was officially established on April 2, 2009, with the main intent of creating software for personal use. However, the company took a positive turn when the software it developed was adopted by other corporations, and it has since become one of the most sought-after software technology companies in its field. Five years after its inception, Epitech had produced software for over fifteen companies. The company intends to improve its standing to become one of the best institutions to work for — not only through providing a proper work environment for its employees, but also through ensuring that a guiding code of ethics is put in place.

Leadership Style and Team Selection

Leadership can broadly be described as the process and practice of directing individuals toward the attainment of predefined objectives and goals. Throughout history, individuals have strived to attain leadership positions, and each person's leadership style has a significant bearing on how successfully an organization achieves its objectives. This is particularly true for individuals in key positions who are responsible for making decisions. In recent years, the concept of leadership has evolved as new information has been revealed and implemented. Among the fundamental styles discussed in the literature are situational, multifactor, and democratic leadership (Lester, 1975, p. 20).

As the founder and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Epitech, my primary leadership approach combines a transactional style with a democratic, or participative, style of leadership. The democratic style encompasses stimulating personnel to participate in the decision-making process, ensuring that employees are well-informed about matters that influence their work, and sharing responsibility for problem-solving. Through this approach, I aim to promote open communication within the organization and encourage operational staff to participate in key decisions (Germano, 2010). This style distributes the burden of leadership and enables me, as CEO, to foster a sense of satisfaction and achievement as employees make progress in their daily responsibilities. Employees who feel they have a stake in the company tend to become more responsible and accountable for performance, resulting in greater productivity.

A transactional leader places major emphasis on maintaining the relationships generated within and outside the company, rather than primarily inspiring novelty and originality (Kuhnert & Lewis, 1987, p. 65). This is the style being employed at Epitech Technologies. It has numerous benefits in the sense that the strong relationships it cultivates create a synergy that is of great importance to the company. The leadership team remains keenly aware of its various stakeholders and focuses on the needs of workers, shareholders, and other interested parties.

Selecting leaders for an organization is a critical undertaking, as many companies spend minimal time choosing the right leaders and then spend far more time correcting the consequences of poor choices. Epitech Technologies employs a rigorous and fair selection process to ensure that all employees given leadership positions are well-suited for those roles. The first step involves clearly defining the qualities and characteristics of the ideal candidate by examining the open leadership position and determining exactly what the company is looking for. Required attributes include the ability to work collaboratively, critical thinking skills, and a passion for software development and programming — the core activity of Epitech Technologies.

Once these criteria are established, the selection process begins. Epitech first considers in-house employees for any open positions, as they already have a diverse understanding of the company's values and operations. If no current employees are best suited, or if positions outnumber suitable internal candidates, the company advertises externally. Applications are collected and compared against the minimum qualifications for each position. Candidates then proceed through three rounds of assessment: an online aptitude test, a timed in-premises aptitude test, and finally a panel interview evaluating passion, outlook, and alignment with the company's values. Epitech Technologies is committed to ensuring this process is fair and impartial, with the primary objective of selecting leaders who are fully in sync with what the company stands for (Goodall, 2007, p. 6).

Formal and Informal Organizational Systems

Organizations are composed of workforces and can be understood as both social and financial entities. In large modern companies, it becomes challenging for employers and personnel to maintain constant direct contact. The formal system of an organization encompasses the authorized chain of command, channels of authority, and their corresponding spans of control. The informal system, by contrast, encompasses the ways in which official regulations are conveyed or modified through the unofficial practices of employees at lower levels. These two types of structure highlight the difference between processes and communications arranged by written guidelines and those that hinge on interpersonal interaction within workplace groups.

Formal System

The formal system of Epitech takes a hierarchical structure. At the top level sits the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). The structure then branches out to the managers who head the various departments: the Human Resource Manager, responsible for employee welfare and recruitment; the Software Development (Information Technology) Manager, responsible for operations and software publication; and the Finance and Sales Manager, responsible for financial operations and product sales. Each manager is followed by their respective subordinates within each department.

Informal System

The informal system of the company takes the form of a network in which all employees across various departments play an integral role in the company's success. Being a software company, it is important to recognize and appreciate the creativity that employees at every level bring. Accordingly, ideas forwarded by employees of all ranks are taken into consideration. This not only increases the level of effort and determination among employees but also ensures that they develop a sense of ownership over the company's progress.

In the formal system, the lowest-ranked employee has minimal formal impact on the company's operations and little contribution to the decision-making process. Key decisions are made by the top-ranking officials — the CEO and the heads of each department. The informal structure, by contrast, actively involves lower-ranked employees through networking and peer collaboration. This creates a synergy among staff that ultimately increases productivity and benefits the company as a whole.

References

Albrecht, S. L. (2010). Handbook of Employee Engagement: Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Baker, M., & Hart, S. (2008). The Marketing Book. Butterworth-Heinemann.

Cook, S. (2008). The Essential Guide to Employee Engagement: Better Business Performance Through Staff Satisfaction. Kogan Page Limited.

Ethics Resource Center. (2011). National Business Ethics Survey: Workplace Ethics in Transition. Retrieved from

Ferrell, L. (2007). Marketing Ethics. University of Wyoming.

Garber, P. (2007). 50 Activities for Employee Engagement. HRD Press.

Garett, R., & Lewis, J. (2010). Ethical Issues in Software Development. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/doc/10880744/Ethical-Issues-in-Software-Development

Germano, M. A. (2010). Leadership style and organizational impact. ALA-APA. Retrieved from

Goodall, A. (2007). How Do Leaders Get Selected? Warwick Business School, University of Warwick.

Goyal, A., & Goyal, M. (2009). Business Environment. Prince Print Process.

Harvard Business Review. (2013). The Impact of Employee Engagement on Performance. Harvard Business School Publishing.

Kruse, K. (2012). What is employee engagement? Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinkruse/2012/06/22/employee-engagement-what-and-why/

Lester, C. N. (1975). Leadership styles — a key to effectiveness. Journal of Extension. Retrieved from www.joe.org/joe/1975november/1975-6-a1.pdf

Rangan, K., Chase, L. A., & Karim, S. (2012). Why Every Company Needs a CSR Strategy and How to Build It. Harvard Business Review.

Reschke, M. (2014). Tim Cook: Changing the culture at Apple. TGAAP. Retrieved from

Singla, R. K. (2009). Business Management. Prince Print Process.

Stokyo, P. (2009). Organizational Culture and the Management of Organizational Memory. Canada School of Public Service.

Trevino, L., & Nelson, K. (2011). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk About How to Do It Right (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.