Aristophanes' Myth of Love in Plato's Symposium
This paper examines Aristophanes' speech in Plato's Symposium, evaluating the myth he presents about the nature of love. It considers whether the myth is useful, misleading, or insightful, exploring Aristophanes' claims that love is the pursuit of wholeness and that all forms of love — including same-sex love — are natural. The paper argues that while parts of the speech are comically exaggerated, its core message about human desire for completeness and its acceptance of diverse loves remains profound and relevant. The analysis concludes that Aristophanes demonstrated a deeper understanding of love's complexity than much of modern society reflects.
- Introduction: Overview of Aristophanes' speech and its themes
- The Nature of Love in Aristophanes' Myth: Love as healing, unifying, and non-gendered
- Usefulness of the Myth: Acceptance and Wholeness: Myth's value in accepting diverse love and wholeness
- Comic Elements and Serious Undertones: Balancing humor and serious philosophical insight
- Conclusion: Myth's enduring relevance and understanding of love
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper balances textual analysis with personal evaluative judgment, directly engaging with the assigned questions (agree/disagree, useful/misleading) rather than merely summarizing the myth.
- It uses direct quotations from Aristophanes' speech to anchor each claim, grounding interpretation in the primary source.
- The paper draws a meaningful connection between ancient ideas and contemporary experience — particularly the modern concept of the "soul mate" — making the argument feel relevant and accessible.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evaluative close reading: the writer does not simply describe what Aristophanes says but judges the merit of his claims, distinguishing between the myth's comic surface (the round two-headed beast) and its serious philosophical core (love as the pursuit of wholeness). This layered reading — separating literary device from substantive argument — is a useful technique for analyzing philosophical texts that blend humor and meaning.
Structure breakdown
The essay follows a clear five-part structure: a brief framing introduction, an exposition of the myth's view of love, an extended analysis of the myth's usefulness (its most developed section), a discussion of its comic versus serious elements, and a short concluding synthesis. Each section builds logically on the last, moving from description to evaluation to conclusion.
Introduction
This paper examines the speech of Aristophanes in Plato's Symposium, evaluating the myth it presents and addressing several key questions: Is this view of love agreeable or disagreeable? Is it useful? Is it misleading? Aristophanes' myth is meant to be funny, but it also makes the reader stop and think about the roles we assign to one another as humans and as lovers. Myth is, by nature, something constructed to educate or amuse, and this myth accomplishes both in its own way. Love is one of the strongest of human emotions, and it brings out strong reactions — just as this speech does.
References
Aristophanes. "The Speech of Aristophanes." Symposium, pp. 25–31.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.