Articles of Confederation, Constitution & the Great Compromise
This paper examines the foundational documents of American government, tracing the evolution from the Articles of Confederation to the United States Constitution. It analyzes the key weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation — including the absence of federal taxing power, lack of executive and judicial branches, and the requirement for unanimous amendments — and explains how the Constitution remedied each deficiency. The paper also discusses how the Bill of Rights addressed grievances listed in the Declaration of Independence, and how the Great Compromise resolved the conflict between large and small states over legislative representation. Additional topics include the Three-Fifths Compromise and the process of constitutional ratification.
- Weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation: Key flaws that made the Articles unworkable
- How the Constitution Strengthened Federal Government: Constitutional solutions to Articles of Confederation failures
- The Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence: Bill of Rights as remedy for Declaration grievances
- The Great Compromise and Legislative Representation: Bicameral compromise between large and small states
- The Three-Fifths Compromise and Slavery: How enslaved people were counted for representation
- Ratification of the Constitution: Process and threshold for constitutional ratification
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its analysis in direct constitutional quotations, lending authority to each claim and giving readers primary-source evidence for major provisions.
- It maintains a clear cause-and-effect structure, showing how each weakness in the Articles of Confederation produced a specific corrective response in the Constitution.
- The paper covers multiple interconnected founding documents in an organized, sequential manner without losing the thread connecting them.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of primary source citation in a legal and historical context. By quoting directly from constitutional articles and amendments (using the standard U.S. Const. citation format), the author supports analytical claims with authoritative textual evidence rather than relying solely on secondary interpretation. This technique is especially valuable in law and political science writing, where the precise language of a document is itself the subject of analysis.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an overview of the Articles of Confederation's failures, then moves sequentially through the Constitution's responses: federal power consolidation, the Bill of Rights as a remedy to Declaration-era grievances, the Great Compromise resolving representation disputes, the Three-Fifths Compromise addressing slavery and population counting, and finally the ratification process. Each section builds logically on the previous one, mirroring the chronological and thematic development of American constitutional history.
Weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation
The Articles of Confederation was the first document attempting to govern how the newly independent states were to act together in their union. However, the Articles of Confederation had significant flaws that rendered them an unrealistic tool for governing the new states. While not all-inclusive, the following are some of the key weaknesses: the federal government could not tax or regulate foreign and interstate commerce; each state had only a single vote in Congress; there were no federal Executive or Judicial branches; amendments required a unanimous vote; and a significant majority (9 of 13 votes) was required to pass legislation.
The result of the Articles of Confederation was that the states engaged in constant bickering, which could not be resolved by the federal government. The states failed to provide financial support for the federal government or truly recognize its authority, instead acting like independent countries. Each state maintained its own currency, many states kept their own military forces, and states entered into independent agreements with foreign governments. The result was a practical absence of a functioning federal government.
How the Constitution Strengthened Federal Government
The Constitution addressed the weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation by providing for a much more powerful federal government. First, the federal government was divided into three branches: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. Each of the three branches played a unique role in governing the emerging nation. Furthermore, the Constitution not only granted powers to the federal government that it had lacked under the Articles of Confederation, but also specifically assigned many of those powers exclusively to the federal government. The Constitution gave Congress the right to tax. Through the Commerce Clause, it granted Congress the exclusive right to regulate interstate and foreign commerce — a logical arrangement, since allowing individual states to regulate interstate commerce would have led to inevitable conflicts.
The Constitution continued to require a supermajority for amendments. Article V provides:
"The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate." (U.S. Const. Art. V)
However, unlike the Articles of Confederation, amendments did not require unanimity, and the Constitution specifically allowed for a simple majority vote to pass ordinary legislation.
The Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence
The Constitution addressed the complaints enumerated in the Declaration of Independence most specifically through the Bill of Rights. The Declaration of Independence levied specific complaints against the King, and the Bill of Rights was intended to address these violations of natural rights. These rights include, but are not limited to: freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, the right to bear arms, the right to a jury trial, the right to due process, the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, and the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment — all of which corresponded to grievances raised in the Declaration of Independence.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.