Bach's Brandenburg Concerto No. 2 vs. Michael Jackson's Thriller
This paper compares two landmark but historically distant musical works: Johann Sebastian Bach's Brandenburg Concerto No. 2 and Michael Jackson's "Thriller." The analysis examines differences in musical purpose, instrumentation, emotional effect, and universality. While Bach's concerto achieves a grandeur rooted in the Baroque tradition — evoking royal imagery through the interplay of strings and wind instruments — Jackson's "Thriller" pursues a dynamic, narrative-driven experience heightened by modern synthesizers and a storyline. The paper reflects on how each piece communicates differently to its audience and why Bach's work may feel more timeless, while Jackson's remains more firmly rooted in its era.
- Introduction: Framing the comparison across era and style
- Bach's Brandenburg Concerto No. 2: Grandeur and Freedom: Baroque grandeur, instrumentation, and creative freedom
- Thriller: Narrative, Sensation, and Modernity: Storytelling, emotional sensation, and modern production
- Timelessness vs. Period-Specific Sound: Why Bach feels universal while Thriller feels dated
- Conclusion: Dynamic contrast and instrumentation across both works
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper maintains a clear comparative frame throughout, consistently returning to how each piece affects the listener rather than simply listing technical facts.
- It uses vivid, concrete imagery — such as the mental picture of a royal court — to anchor abstract musical qualities in accessible language.
- The discussion of instrumentation (strings, wind instruments, synthesizers) provides specific musical evidence to support each comparative claim.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates listener-centered comparative analysis: rather than evaluating the works purely on technical or historical grounds, it consistently grounds each observation in how a listener perceives and emotionally responds to the music. This approach makes musical analysis accessible while still engaging with concrete musical features such as instrumentation, narrative structure, and production technology.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a framing introduction that acknowledges the vast historical and cultural distance between the two works. It then devotes a section to each piece individually before drawing them into direct comparison on the question of timelessness versus period-specific sound. The conclusion synthesizes these observations. The structure is straightforward and well-suited to a short comparative essay at the undergraduate introductory level.
Introduction
Bach's Brandenburg Concerto No. 2 and Michael Jackson's "Thriller" are two very different pieces of music, belonging to different periods of time, different historical and cultural backgrounds, and different perspectives on what music is and does. As a result, they address different audiences and produce different effects — both in terms of sound and in terms of each listener's individual, personal perception. This paper briefly presents both works, emphasizes some of the key differences between them, and reflects on how those differences shape the experience of hearing each piece.
Bach's Brandenburg Concerto No. 2: Grandeur and Freedom
Bach's Brandenburg Concerto No. 2 is a classic musical work, carrying all the characteristics that come with that distinction. The most striking of these is its grandeur. The combination of string instruments — violas, violins, and cellos — with wind instruments such as flute and oboe is likely the direct source of this impression on the listener. As one listens, one can almost conjure the mental image of a royal court, where a monarch is welcomed on these tones, or a ball at a royal palace complete with an elaborate and similarly grand dance.
Importantly, the Brandenburg Concerto No. 2 is not constructed to follow a storyline or carry lyrics, as "Thriller" does, or as a classical opera of Bach's own time would. Because of this, Bach seems to enjoy an extra freedom in his creative process, writing music with the sole purpose of making it sound beautiful for the listener — unconstrained by narrative demands.
Thriller: Narrative, Sensation, and Modernity
A similar goal of pleasing the listener is present in "Thriller," but with the added dimension that Michael Jackson also aims to follow a storyline and, simultaneously, create specific sensations. The song is called "Thriller," and the music must communicate a message that will occasionally intrigue — even frighten — the listener. If one recalls the famous music video, there is always a sense of suspense hanging in the air. Since the video is not always available, those sensations must be transmitted through the music alone.
Conclusion
Taken together, these two works illustrate how profoundly the purpose and context of a musical composition shape the listener's experience. Bach's Brandenburg Concerto No. 2 achieves a grand, timeless beauty by freeing itself from narrative constraints and relying on the interplay of classical instruments. "Thriller," meanwhile, harnesses modern production techniques and a driving storyline to create a visceral, era-specific emotional experience. Both works succeed brilliantly on their own terms, and comparing them reveals just how wide the possibilities of musical expression truly are.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.