Banking Sector Confidence After the 2007–2009 Financial Crisis
This research paper investigates the confidence levels of members of the international banking community regarding the sector's ability to withstand another global economic crisis comparable to the 2007–2009 financial crisis. Drawing on the Trust, Confidence, and Cooperation (TCC) model developed by Earle, Siegrist, and Gutscher, the paper examines how trust and confidence among regulators, banks, and the general public contributed to the crisis and what role they play in recovery. The study also considers the effects of rising global sovereign debt, the transition from quantitative easing to quantitative tightening, and geopolitical uncertainties on banker sentiment. A quantitative survey methodology targeting 1,000 international bankers is proposed to measure confidence, geopolitical awareness, and awareness of monetary policy shifts.
- Introduction and Background: Problem, purpose, research questions, and hypotheses
- Theoretical Framework: Trust, Confidence, and the TCC Model: TCC model and its application to banking
- Trust, Confidence, and Key Players in the Financial Crisis: Regulators, banks, and public roles in crisis
- Post-Financial Crisis Banking Industry: Recovery, lingering risks, and banker confidence
- Banking Integration and Capital Flows: Cross-border capital flows and leverage cycles
- Research Methodology: Survey design, sampling, and validity approach
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its research questions and hypotheses firmly in real, named economic actors and specific data points — Lupton's 26-percentage-point rise in sovereign debt and Dimon's commentary on quantitative easing — giving the problem statement credibility and precision.
- The theoretical framework is clearly integrated throughout the paper: the TCC model is introduced, explained, and then applied directly to the three key player groups (regulators, banks, and the public), demonstrating coherent use of theory to frame empirical inquiry.
- The null and alternative hypotheses are well-matched to the research questions, reflecting sound quantitative research design and methodological clarity.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective alignment between the problem statement, research questions, hypotheses, and theoretical framework. Each research question maps onto a specific hypothesis, and both are anchored in the TCC model. This structural coherence — moving from a real-world problem to a theoretical lens and then to testable propositions — is a hallmark of well-designed quantitative research proposals.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a conventional research proposal structure: introduction and background, statement of the problem, purpose and research questions, hypotheses, key term definitions, theoretical framework, literature review, and methodology. Each section builds on the previous one, moving from contextual motivation through theoretical grounding to proposed empirical measurement. The literature review is organized thematically around trust and confidence definitions, their correlation with key financial actors, post-crisis recovery, and banking integration.
Introduction and Background
Although its full effects will not be understood for many years, the 2007–2008 financial crisis is already regarded as one of the most significant financial disasters in history. There is broad consensus that trust and confidence played critical roles in the crisis and are essential to any effective plan for recovery. As with all preceding financial crises, at the root of the problem lies a loss of confidence by investors and the general public in the strength of key financial institutions and markets (Earle, 2009). The reason for this study is that confidence plays a large role in how money is invested, where it is placed, and what markets will do. Everything from bonds to equities to precious metals and even blockchain is affected by confidence. Banks must have some awareness of their confidence levels should another economic crisis arise. If confidence is low, that knowledge can give banks an opportunity to de-leverage and reduce risk in order to better survive an economic crisis.
Statement of the Problem
Two key developments prompted this research study. First, Senior Global Economist Joseph Lupton (2018) at J.P. Morgan pointed out that global sovereign debt has risen by 26 percentage points of gross domestic product (GDP) since 2007. Second, J.P. Morgan Chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon (2017) noted that, given that quantitative easing has never been implemented on this scale and we do not fully understand its myriad effects on asset prices, confidence, capital expenditures, and other factors, we cannot completely anticipate the effects of its reversal. The major issue facing the international banking industry — with debt levels so high and interest rates rising — is therefore whether bankers are any better positioned to withstand a similar or worse crisis than that of 2007–2009.
There is a significant need to address this problem, as the Great Recession remains fresh in the minds of many and the likelihood of another, potentially more severe recession looms (Mauldin, 2018). Understanding the confidence and positioning of international banks can play a key role in determining whether defaults in one region of the world — for instance, the United States, China, or Italy — would affect the banking industry as a whole (Bouvatier & Delatte, 2015) and whether precautions should be taken now. During the 2007–2009 financial crisis, individual banks required bailouts from central banking institutions because they were unprepared for failure, and the collapse of some institutions could have triggered failures across the board (Bruno & Shin, 2015). At present, it is not well established whether international banks are in a better position to endure a similar or even worse financial crisis. Although stress tests are conducted regularly, they do not always reveal the true magnitude to which a crisis could affect the industry.
Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this quantitative study is to assess the confidence levels of members of the international banking community with respect to the sector's ability to weather another global economic crisis like that seen from 2007–2009, following the collapse of sub-prime lending in the U.S. and the wave of defaults across the global banking sector that was only relieved through central banking intervention (Haitsma, Unalmis, & de Haan, 2016; Heller, 2017). The goal of the research is to better understand the extent to which the international banking sector is prepared for another possible global economic crisis. To understand the industry's confidence, it is helpful to address the community directly and hear firsthand how vulnerable real-life bankers felt in 2018, given a trade dispute between the U.S. and China, numerous countries voicing a desire to reduce dependence on the U.S. dollar in response to economic sanctions, and the Federal Reserve's stated intention to initiate quantitative tightening.
The intent of this study is thus to assess the confidence of members of the international banking community regarding whether the sector can safely handle another global economic crisis like that of 2007–2009 and whether geopolitical awareness affects that confidence level.
Need for the Study
Confidence plays a large role in how money is invested, where it is placed, and what markets will do. Everything from bonds to equities to precious metals and even blockchain is affected by confidence. Banks must have some awareness of their confidence levels should another economic crisis arise. If confidence is low, that knowledge can give banks an opportunity to de-leverage and reduce risk in order to better survive a downturn.
Research Questions
The research questions for this study are:
Q1: Is the international banking sector confident that it can handle another global economic crisis like that seen from 2007–2009?
Q2: Does geopolitical awareness impact how confident members of the international banking community feel about whether the sector can handle another global economic crisis like that seen from 2007–2009?
Q3: Does awareness of rising debt levels around the world and changes in central bank monetary policy (i.e., transitioning from quantitative easing to quantitative tightening) impact how confident members of the international banking community feel about whether the sector can handle another global economic crisis like that seen from 2007–2009?
These research questions align with the research problem by focusing on the issues raised by Lupton (2018) and Dimon (2017) regarding rising debt levels, changing monetary policy, and the question of whether banks are prepared for these challenges. The questions align with the purpose statement by focusing on the need to assess the confidence levels of international bankers to ensure they are prepared for what could be an impending recession worse than the last (Mauldin, 2018). Based on survey data to be collected, the constructs of confidence, geopolitical awareness, and awareness of debt and quantitative tightening can be measured.
Hypotheses
Null Hypotheses:
H01: The international banking sector is not confident that it can handle another global economic crisis like that seen from 2007–2009.
H02: Members of the international banking community with geopolitical awareness do not feel confident that the sector can handle another global economic crisis like that seen from 2007–2009.
H03: Members of the international banking community with awareness of rising debt levels around the world and changes in central bank monetary policy (i.e., transitioning from quantitative easing to quantitative tightening) do not feel confident that the sector can handle another global economic crisis like that seen from 2007–2009.
Alternative Hypotheses:
H11: The international banking sector is confident that it can handle another global economic crisis like that seen from 2007–2009.
H12: Members of the international banking community with geopolitical awareness do feel confident that the sector can handle another global economic crisis like that seen from 2007–2009.
H13: Members of the international banking community with awareness of rising debt levels around the world and changes in central bank monetary policy (i.e., transitioning from quantitative easing to quantitative tightening) do feel confident that the sector can handle another global economic crisis like that seen from 2007–2009.
Definition of Key Terms
Quantitative Easing (QE): An unconventional monetary policy in which a central bank purchases government securities or other types of securities from the market in order to lower interest rates and increase the money supply. QE stimulates an increase in the money supply by flooding financial institutions with capital in an effort to encourage greater lending and liquidity.
Confidence: The belief, founded on experience or evidence such as past performance, that certain future events will occur as expected.
Global Financial Crisis: A financial crisis that affects numerous nations simultaneously. It is a period of severe difficulty and challenge that financial institutions, markets, corporations, and consumers experience at the same time. During a global financial crisis, financial institutions lose confidence and cease lending to one another, and traders stop purchasing financial instruments. Ultimately, most lending ceases and businesses suffer significantly.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.