Bechtel Power Corp Welding Tests and Race Discrimination
This paper examines Bechtel Power Corporation's use of objective welding competency tests in the employment case of Charles Ligons, an African-American welder at the Duane Arnold Energy Center construction site in Iowa. The paper evaluates whether Bechtel discriminated against Ligons on the basis of race or whether the company made good-faith efforts to support his advancement through training and standardized testing. Drawing on details of Ligons's two employment periods, his test attempts, and the broader layoff context, the paper concludes that Bechtel's testing process was applied consistently and without racial bias.
- Introduction and Background: Ligons hired, observed failing weld, sent for testing
- Training and Testing During Initial Employment: Week of training, failed standardized heliarc test
- Layoff, Rehiring, and Second Testing Period: Laid off with others, rehired, failed ASME test again
- Assessment of Racial Discrimination Claims: Standardized test applied equally; no racial bias found
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It focuses tightly on a specific factual record, using concrete details such as training duration, test standards, and layoff demographics to support its conclusion.
- It frames the central question clearly at the outset — whether the company attempted to help Ligons maintain and upgrade his welding competence — and addresses it directly throughout.
- It avoids rhetorical excess, presenting the analysis in a measured, evidence-based tone that suits a legal or employment case study format.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the technique of systematically applying factual evidence to a legal or ethical question. Rather than relying on general assertions, it grounds each claim in specific details: the number of training weeks, the standardized test body (ASME Code), and the racial composition of layoffs. This approach mirrors case-analysis writing common in law and business ethics courses.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with background on Ligons's hire and initial testing failure, moves through the layoff and rehiring sequence, then evaluates the discrimination claim against the evidence. The conclusion synthesizes the findings to answer the guiding question. Though brief, the structure is logically progressive and argument-driven.
Introduction and Background
Charles Ligons, an African-American welder, was employed by Bechtel Power Corporation at the Iowa Electric Light and Power Duane Arnold Energy Center construction site. After only one week on the job, he was required to report to the test shop for training and evaluation. The reason for this requirement was that a welding engineer had observed him improperly preparing a weld. Although Ligons had passed a test qualifying him to perform heliarc welding at the at-LH level before joining Bechtel, he failed the same test after one week of training. He was therefore not qualified to work in the position for which he had been hired.
As a result, the at-LH welding position for which Ligons was originally hired remained unfilled for the 18 months during which he continued to work for the company as a general welder — a lower-level role than the one he had been brought on to perform.
Training and Testing During Initial Employment
Bechtel provided Ligons with a week of targeted training before requiring him to sit the qualifying examination. Despite this preparation, he was unable to pass the test and could not be placed in the at-LH welding category. It is notable that Ligons received more training time than other employees — five weeks in total across his employment — and was permitted to attempt the test on two separate occasions. This additional support suggests that Bechtel made a genuine effort to help him meet the required standard rather than moving quickly to disqualify him.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.