This paper examines the concept of biological evolution, beginning by distinguishing it from the broader usage of the term "evolution" as applied to galaxies, societies, and languages. It defines biological evolution as heritable change in populations over time and identifies its two primary mechanisms: random genetic mutations and natural selection. The paper challenges the common misconception that evolution is inherently progressive or directional—moving from simple to complex organisms. Using the hypothesized evolution of snakes as a case study, it demonstrates that biological populations can evolve toward reduced structural complexity. The paper concludes that evolution has no predetermined pathway or direction, and that natural selection simply favors adaptations that enhance survival in specific environmental conditions.
The general assumption is that the term evolution suggests that change is always progressive and follows a course from simple to complex. In fact, this is not true. In the broadest sense of the term, evolution merely refers to change, and so galaxies, societies, customs, and languages all change (Gould, 2002). It is well-known that the theory of stellar evolution, when applied to the changes of a galaxy or of a star such as our sun, predicts an increase in randomness over time rather than an increase in complexity (Hansen, Kawaler, & Trimble, 2004). The sun, for example, will one day be extinguished and become a black dwarf or black hole (Hansen, Kawaler, & Trimble, 2004).
When people speak of "evolution," they are generally speaking of biological evolution, which can be defined as the change in the properties of populations of living organisms that occurs over long periods of time—periods that surpass the lifetime of any single organism (Futuyma, 2005). The changes in populations of animals or other organisms that are considered evolutionary consist of those changes that are passed on via heredity from one generation to the next. Biological evolution can consist of very slight changes in a population or of very substantial ones (Futuyma, 2005). It is important to note that individuals are not the focus of evolutionary change; rather, entire populations, genera, and species are the focus of biological evolution.
According to the most contemporary accepted definitions and theory of biological evolution, the mechanism for producing evolution is twofold: random genetic mutations combined with an environmental force known as natural selection (Wu & Lin, 2006). These genetic mutations consist of random changes in the alleles of a population (Carroll, 2006). Natural selection is the mechanism that determines whether such random changes in the genetic material of a specific population survive. Natural selection acts as a type of sieve: genetic mutations that allow adaptation to environmental conditions continue to be expressed, whereas mutations that are not beneficial for the survival of the organism tend to disappear or die out (Gould, 2002).
According to the theoretical underpinnings of biological evolution, there is no predetermined biological mechanism or pathway that directs the process of evolution from simple to complex organisms (Carroll, 2001). Random mutations are nondirectional and unpredictable changes in the alleles of a population. Natural selection is simply a process by which the genetic mutations that allow for the adaptation and survival of a population in specific environmental conditions continue to persist (Carroll, 2001; Gould, 2002). While this process often involves movement toward greater structural complexity, this is not always the case.
"Snakes as evidence of complexity-reducing evolution"
The concept of biological evolution does not necessarily include a predetermined pathway from simple to complex organisms. Natural selection favors whatever adaptations enhance a population's survival in its specific environmental conditions—whether those adaptations involve greater complexity, reduced complexity, or neither. Evolution, in its truest biological sense, is a nondirectional process driven by random genetic change and environmental pressure.
You’re 67% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.