Eurocentrism and Colonial History: Blaut's Eight Historians
This paper reviews James M. Blaut's Eight Eurocentric Historians (2000), the second volume in Blaut's trilogy on Eurocentrism. The review examines Blaut's central argument that European dominance was not the product of unique racial, environmental, cultural, or religious superiority, but rather of colonial exploitation and geographic proximity to the Americas. The paper surveys Blaut's critique of eight major Western historians — including Max Weber, Jared Diamond, and David Landes — and evaluates his use of geographic, agronomic, and historical evidence to dismantle Eurocentric diffusionism. It concludes that Blaut's work offers an important corrective to mainstream historiography by centering colonialism as the driving force behind European modernity.
- Introduction: History as Western Ideology: History framed as Western ideological projection
- The Eight Eurocentric Historians and Their Claims: Overview of eight historians and four Eurocentric claims
- European Diffusionism and the Colonial World Model: Diffusionism as colonial doctrine explained
- Challenging the 'Rise of Europe' Narrative: Pre-1492 parity and colonial wealth as cause
- Agriculture, Environment, and False Objectivity: Blaut refutes agronomic and environmental Eurocentric claims
- Capitalism, Modernity, and Colonialist Historiography: Capitalism as central contested concept
- Conclusion: Toward an Alternative History: Book's value for decolonial historiography affirmed
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The review accurately maps the structure of Blaut's argument, moving from the book's theoretical framing to its specific historical evidence, giving readers a coherent sense of the work's scope.
- Concrete examples — such as the quote from Tome Pires on Indian merchants and the analysis of potato agriculture — ground abstract claims about Eurocentrism in specific textual evidence from Blaut.
- The paper maintains a clear evaluative stance throughout, consistently assessing Blaut's persuasiveness rather than merely summarizing his claims.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates critical book review technique: it situates the work within a broader scholarly context (the trilogy on Eurocentrism), explains the author's methodology (geographic and historical analysis), and evaluates the strength of specific arguments with supporting examples drawn directly from the text. This approach models how to engage analytically with a secondary source rather than simply describe it.
Structure breakdown
The review opens by framing history as Western ideology, then introduces Blaut's book and its eight subjects. It proceeds through Blaut's core thesis — European diffusionism as colonial doctrine — and his counter-evidence on pre-1492 parity between civilizations. A focused section addresses agricultural and environmental claims before widening to the question of capitalism and modernity. The conclusion affirms the book's contribution to decolonial historiography.
Introduction: History as Western Ideology
History, accordingly, is not only an account of the human past but also a projection of its future — a vision of an end determined and dominated by the West. History is a modern effort at the creation of meaning: a reflection on the "destiny" of Western man. But history is also the ideological mainstay of life and the ruler of its disciplines. Nowhere are these thoughts more apparent than in Eight Eurocentric Historians by James M. Blaut.
Eight Eurocentric Historians was the second installment in a trilogy on Eurocentrism. First came The Colonizer's Model of the World (Guilford, 1993), a broad statement of the problem. The final installment would have been Decolonizing the Past, which, offering an alternative model of history, would have given what Blaut called the "people without history" their proper due.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.