This case study examines the Bridgestone/Firestone tire recall of 2000—involving 6.5 million defective tires and 150 fatalities linked to Ford Explorer rollovers—through the framework of Total Quality Management (TQM). The paper argues that the absence of functioning TQM practices at both Bridgestone/Firestone and Ford allowed nearly a decade of substandard rubber processing at the Decatur, Illinois plant to go undetected. Drawing on Baldrige Award quality criteria, the analysis identifies specific TQM tools—process quality management and quality results measurement—that could have prevented the crisis. The paper concludes by outlining a path for Firestone to rebuild its quality image through systemic TQM implementation and targeted marketing.
Total quality management (TQM), defined in the most simplistic of terms, is the incremental improvement of all facets of a business to increase customer satisfaction and, in turn, company viability. Although TQM is often applied first to manufacturing functions in an organization — zero defects, on-time production — the intent of TQM is equally meaningful in all aspects of business: from administrative functions (zero defects in billing and timely collection of accounts receivable), to distribution (no breakage, just-in-time delivery), to management (appropriate incentive structures, timely and accurate stakeholder reporting). The increased efficiency and competitiveness created through TQM initiatives is not limited to the manufacturing sector alone; many of the benefits of TQM are realized in the service sector as well.
In the case of Bridgestone/Firestone, TQM was not pursued prior to the recall of its 6.5 million tires in 2000, as evidenced by the magnitude of the defective products involved. Had a TQM program existed at Bridgestone/Firestone, the scale of the recall would have been significantly reduced or eliminated entirely. A TQM initiative would have uncovered the improper processing of rubber at the company's plant in Decatur, Illinois, over the nearly ten years that inferior products were manufactured at that location.
The inadequacy of TQM practices at Ford is also apparent. While the direct problem of tire blowouts rested with Bridgestone/Firestone rather than Ford, Ford should have responded to quality signals such as 150 people killed in rollovers involving Ford Explorers fitted with Bridgestone/Firestone tires. A functioning TQM program would not have rested on safety rankings alone; instead, it would have driven quality improvements throughout the supply chain, including pressure on Bridgestone/Firestone to address its manufacturing deficiencies.
Typical tools for quality assurance, derived from the criteria of the Baldrige Award program, include information and analysis (industry benchmarks), quality planning (setting goals), process quality management (creating products according to plans), quality results (measurements), and customer satisfaction assessment. In Bridgestone/Firestone's case, process quality management is a critical tool for resolving the problem of defective products. Its purpose is to ensure properly functioning manufacturing processes — precisely the safeguard that was absent over a number of years, as the tire recall demonstrates.
The use of a quality-results tool would also have been valuable for Bridgestone/Firestone. This tool assesses the quality of products being produced, a measure that would have enabled more timely identification and resolution of the improper rubber processing before the problem reached consumers at such scale.
"Explains how TQM drives competitiveness and efficiency"
"Outlines a TQM-based brand recovery strategy"
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.