This paper examines the relationship between residential foreclosures and neighborhood crime through the lens of broken windows theory. Drawing on a case study of Garfield Heights, Ohio, the paper argues that foreclosed and vacant homes accelerate physical decay, invite petty and serious criminal activity, and create a self-reinforcing cycle of disinvestment and disorder. Structural factors — including income inequality, race, and uneven law enforcement — amplify these effects in low-income communities. The paper connects broken windows theory to strain theory and class conflict theory, and recommends that real estate officials, banks, law enforcement, and community stakeholders collaborate to prevent neighborhood deterioration before it escalates into sustained criminal activity.
The essence of broken windows theory is that if a neighborhood or city fails to address its broken windows and graffiti, the environment will continue to descend into crime, chaos, and violence (Thompson, 2012). Environmental variables have a significant impact on crime rates, which is why it is important to pay close attention to the foreclosure phenomenon and the rate at which foreclosures are occurring in certain neighborhoods. A vicious cycle can be created whereby neighborhoods with high rates of foreclosure experience higher rates of crime, and those high-crime neighborhoods become far less attractive to prospective investors and home buyers. The result is a perpetually depressed and crime-ridden neighborhood.
Using broken windows theory, it becomes clear why law enforcement and city officials need to closely monitor which neighborhoods are at risk. Real estate investors should also be aware of the problem, working to ensure that areas with high foreclosure rates remain attractive to new investment. New investors can help prevent crime within the context of broken windows theory.
Broken windows theory accounts for the two-way relationship between crime and foreclosure rates. On one hand, important socioeconomic variables drive the foreclosure rate. As Wilson, Cieplowski, and Lee (n.d.) point out, "lower income neighborhoods and those already struggling to address other social problems may be most at risk" (p. 193). Areas with low-income housing, where residents hold low-paying jobs, are already at risk for crime and tend to receive weaker law enforcement responses compared to wealthier neighborhoods. The same residents who cannot afford to keep their homes are already vulnerable to crime. When foreclosures occur, their neighborhoods suffer further due to the deterioration of the community.
Foreclosed homes become vacant homes, which lead to decay, dereliction, vandalism, and petty crime. Petty crimes can then escalate to more serious offenses, which may be carried out under the cover of anonymity that an empty neighborhood block provides. For this reason, real estate officials, banks, and the broader community can work together to ensure that foreclosed homes are put up for rent or that neighborhoods receive regular law enforcement patrols.
Wilson, Cieplowski, and Lee (n.d.) focus on one neighborhood in Ohio called Garfield Heights. In Garfield Heights, a community suburb of Cleveland, foreclosure rates have risen rapidly, affecting every section of the community, which is diverse in terms of race, class, family structure, and age. Looking at Garfield Heights is like examining a microcosm of what is happening across the rest of the country, as it reveals broad national trends.
Low-income neighborhoods are at far greater risk for decay and degradation than higher-income neighborhoods, because in wealthier areas, homes are resolved — sold or rehabilitated — more quickly. As a result, there are no real or metaphorical broken windows in wealthier communities. Those communities respond more effectively to foreclosures and do not manifest the crime problems seen in economically disadvantaged areas. Race also factors into this equation, as low-income neighborhoods are disproportionately populated by people of color, amplifying the unequal impact of foreclosure-driven neighborhood decline.
"Ohio suburb illustrates national foreclosure trends"
"Income, race, and policing drive neighborhood decline"
You’re 74% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.