This paper examines the phenomenon of bullying among school-age youth in the United States, tracing its prevalence, definitions, and forms from traditional face-to-face aggression to cyberbullying. The paper reviews empirical research on who is victimized, how bullying manifests across gender and racial groups, and how the shift to digital platforms has complicated detection and intervention. It also details the long-term psychological, physical, and behavioral consequences of bullying for both victims and perpetrators. Finally, the paper evaluates current prevention and intervention strategies, identifies gaps in existing programs — including inadequate attention to students with disabilities — and calls for whole-school, community-wide approaches alongside additional longitudinal research.
The paper consistently employs synthesis across multiple sources to build a cumulative argument. Rather than reporting each study in isolation, the author weaves together findings from Olweus, Nansel, Willard, and others to show convergence on key points (e.g., the characteristics of victims) while also flagging where scholars disagree. This technique — comparative synthesis with explicit attribution — is a hallmark of graduate-level literature review writing.
The paper opens with national prevalence statistics to establish urgency, then defines bullying through a review of theoretical frameworks. Separate sections address cyberbullying's definition, its relationship to traditional bullying, and their comparative harms. A substantial middle section catalogs long-term consequences across psychological, physical, behavioral, and addictive dimensions. The paper then pivots to prevention, critiquing ineffective programs before identifying evidence-based whole-school models. The conclusion synthesizes gaps and calls for future research, parent education, and inclusion of special populations.
Nearly 30% — or approximately 5.7 million — of United States teenagers are estimated to have been involved in an incident of school-related bullying, either as the target, the bully, or both. A recent national survey of students in grades 6 through 10 revealed that nearly 13% of students reported bullying other children, 11% reported being victimized by bullies, and an additional 6% indicated they had been both perpetrators and victims of bullying (Nansel, Overpeck, Pilla, Ruan, Simons-Morton, & Scheidt, 2001). Estimates indicate that once every seven seconds, a child is the victim of bullying in a United States school. According to a study completed in 2001, 9% of all males and 7% of all females ages 12–18 reported experiencing bullying during the previous six months.
According to the 2003 National Center for Education Statistics report on school violence, there were significant increases in the percentage of students who were victims of bullying in 2001 compared to 1999. While crime has declined in recent years, bullying is one of the few school-related issues that has shown continual increase in both intensity and prevalence (Ericson, 2001). During the same time period studied, the percentage of students who reported an increase in bullying was evident across all ethnic and racial groups with the exception of Black students. Approximately 6% of Black students in both 1999 and 2001 indicated they had been bullied. Between 1999 and 2001, the percentage of students bullied increased from 5% to 9% for Whites, from 4% to 8% for Hispanic students, and from 3% to 7% for other non-Hispanic students (NCES, 2003). Since the time of these studies, the national rates of prevalence and incidence have increased continuously and significantly.
In order to understand the implications, efficaciousness, perceptions, and pervasiveness of bullying, it is important to identify and define the characteristics of this phenomenon. Doing so helps recognize shortcomings in bullying prevention, social-emotional education, and current support initiatives. Various definitions of bullying have been proposed by theorists and researchers, but commonalities across these definitions are underscored by four relatively consistent variables: diversity of manifestation, intentionality, repetition, and imbalance of power (Schoen & Schoen, 2010). According to Schoen and Schoen in their article "Bullying and Harassment in the United States," bullying carries a purposeful intent to embarrass, harm, and/or offend the victim; involves repeated acts of aggression toward an individual or group; involves an imbalance of status or power, whether perceived or realized; and the type of aggression can vacillate from direct to indirect (p. 68). Direct bullying consists of verbal and physical assaults, including scorning, humiliating, threatening, hitting, kicking, and punching, whereas indirect bullying includes acts of intimidation through exclusion or gesturing. The spreading of rumors and insults via email and text messaging have also been classified as indirect forms of bullying (Schoen & Schoen, 2010). Although cyberbullying is considered a relatively new component of bullying, harassment through multimedia formats has the potential to produce profound psychological damage (Beatty & Alexeyex, 2008). In summary, "bullying consists of a series of repeated, intentional cruel incidents between the same children who are primarily in the same bully and victim roles" (Hoover & Stenhjem, 2003, p. 2).
The pervasiveness of bullying has been documented across all academic levels according to recent studies by the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP, 2006; Schoen & Schoen, 2010). Verbal bullying has been demonstrated as a pervasive phenomenon in elementary, middle, and high school, while incidents of physical bullying occur at greater proportions in middle school (Cohn & Cantor, 2003). Characteristics such as perceived helplessness, weakness, and shyness have been significantly correlated with victimization; however, the debate over risk factors and bullying status persists (Khosropour & Walsh, 2001). Researchers have identified rumors, exclusion, name-calling, racial slurs, material theft or damage, and physical aggression as the most frequent forms of bullying (Dixon, 2006). Researchers have also noted gender differences in how bullying transpires and who enacts the offense. Olweus (2003) determined that girls were primarily bullied by both girls and boys, whereas boys were primarily victimized by other boys. Moreover, boys tend to be the recipients of more physical assault and aggression, while girls are primarily the victims of non-physical aggression. Overall, boys have been identified as both the deliverer and object of bullying at a higher frequency than girls (Nansel et al., 2003).
Olweus (1993) posits that only physical weakness is consistently associated with those who are victimized; however, more recent empirical evidence suggests that 67% of children with special needs are bullied in mainstream settings, compared to their counterparts who are not physically handicapped (Beatty & Alexeyex, 2008). Nationally, bullying occurs across racial groups, socioeconomic backgrounds, and geographical locations (Nansel et al., 2003). According to Beatty and Alexeyex (2008) in their article "The Problem of School Bullies: What the Research Tells Us," victims are most often chosen from the chronological peer group of the bully. Researchers consider it reasonable that this selection process occurs as it does, since bullies tend to target those with whom they have the most peer-to-peer interaction. Bullying transpires most often in places with less supervision, such as hallways, restrooms, and lunchrooms, and tends to escalate on playgrounds and in other informal settings. Victims in these settings tend to appear more submissive or passive than others in their peer cohort (Olweus, 2003). Individuals who are targeted often present as more vulnerable to attack, exhibiting characteristics such as insecurity, unhappiness, and tendencies toward anxiety, sensitivity, or withdrawal (Schoen & Schoen, 2010). According to Pepler and Craig (1995), "victims of bullying tend to be victimized over time, entering a dangerous cycle of abuse" (p. 33).
Cyberbullying is generally defined as bullying that occurs outside the traditional realm of face-to-face contact. Perpetrators use technology as the medium through which verbal and visual threats and acts of aggression are carried out. The National Crime Prevention Council defines cyberbullying as "use of the internet, cell phone or other devices to send or post text or images intended to hurt or embarrass another person" (NCPC, 2008). Cyberbullying can be difficult and insidious to manage and prosecute. Researchers and other authorities have also found it difficult to operationalize. Given the accelerated evolution and complexity of new technologies, existing classifications are often quickly rendered obsolete. The different uses of technological devices across cultures can affect cultural meaning as well as the frequency with which certain behaviors occur (David-Ferdon & Hertz, 2007). Specific characteristics such as the anonymity of the acts and the public or private nature of the attacks must also be factored into any working definition.
Traditional bullying has been a longstanding area of concern in the school environment, affecting nearly 30% of children in the United States (Nansel, Overpeck, Pilla, et al., 2001). More traditional forms of bullying involve social harm inflicted over time toward a person judged to be less powerful, with intentional verbal and/or physical harm. A significant transition has occurred, however, with children and adolescents' often unsupervised use of the internet and text messaging for social communication, making the phenomenon of cyberbullying increasingly prevalent (Twyman, Conway, Taylor, & Comeaux, 2010). Although results vary, recent empirical studies indicate that an estimated 4% to 15% of children participate in cyberbullying, with more cases reported in later middle school and high school (Kowalski & Limber, 2007). More and more children are becoming victims of cyberbullying, with an estimated 19% to 42% having been bullied online at least once (Wolak, Mitchell, & Finkelhor, 2006). Reports also indicate that children who participated in traditional bullying are becoming increasingly more involved in cyberbullying, with very high percentages of those children acting as cyberbullies (Kowalski & Limber, 2007).
In a study of 177 seventh-grade students, research revealed that an estimated 54% were victims of traditional bullying and 17% were bullied online (Li, 2007). Of the 31% who acknowledged participating in traditional bullying, 30% had also bullied someone online, and another 27% were victims of online bullying (Li, 2007). Research has also reflected that children who are victims of traditional or cyberbullying are more likely to retaliate virtually than in person (Willard, 2007).
Bullying is also relevant to early childhood development. There is no specific age at which bullying begins or ends; it has been observed as early as preschool. During the early years, up until about the age of seven, researchers assert that the victim is often picked at random. However, as the bully ages, the choice of victim becomes much more specific and the acts of aggression more deliberate. Empirical research also indicates that bullying is not a phase that children simply grow out of, as adults who experienced bullying in their own childhoods sometimes suggest. In a long-term study of more than 500 children at the University of Michigan, researchers determined that children seen as aggressive by their peers at the age of eight grew up to commit increasingly serious crimes as adults. Additional scholarly research has indicated that as bullies move into adulthood, they also tend to abuse their children and spouses (Olweus, 1993).
When looking at these results and other empirical research collectively, the findings suggest it would be most advantageous for teachers, clinicians, and school administrators to develop interventions focused on reducing the stigma associated with not engaging in physical aggression and on creating school social norms of nonviolence. Teaching students prosocial and non-aggressive strategies for managing conflict and expressing negative emotions may also prove beneficial. Moreover, intervention and prevention programs proven to be most effective tend to be those focused on whole-school prevention — establishing expectations and rules related to bullying that serve to alter the school's social norms regarding the behavior of bullies, bystanders, victims, and school personnel. There is also little empirical evidence derived from direct case studies or qualitative interviews with individuals who have self-identified as bullies or been affirmed as such by authorities. Gaining insight directly from bullies regarding causes, underlying social-emotional factors, victim typology, and potentially effective intervention techniques would greatly enrich the scholarly literature.
You’re 40% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.