Caliban and Prospero in Shakespeare's The Tempest
This essay examines two of the most complex characters in Shakespeare's The Tempest: Caliban and Prospero. Through close reading, the paper explores how Caliban embodies the paradoxes of colonialism — simultaneously portrayed as savage and sympathetic, rightful owner of the island yet dispossessed by Prospero's "civilizing" authority. The essay also analyzes Prospero as an omnipotent, playwright-like figure who orchestrates the entire narrative through magical knowledge and psychological manipulation. Together, these character studies reveal how The Tempest both validates colonial power structures and subtly complicates them, offering audiences a morally ambiguous drama beneath its surface resolution.
- Caliban and the Paradox of Colonialism: Caliban's savagery versus rightful island ownership
- Caliban as Sympathetic Yet Marginalized Figure: Caliban's poetic voice and Ariel as foil
- Prospero as Playwright and Omnipotent Controller: Prospero's godlike narrative control over the island
- Prospero's Psychological Mastery: Mind games and manipulation of Ferdinand, Caliban, Ariel
- The Tempest as Colonial Allegory: Play reframed as allegory for colonial and artistic power
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay sustains a consistent interpretive lens — colonial power dynamics — across both character analyses, creating thematic unity between the two sections.
- It uses textual evidence drawn from the play (Caliban's poetry, Miranda's fear, Prospero's manipulation of Ferdinand) to support each analytical claim rather than relying on assertion alone.
- The discussion of irony in Prospero's domination of Caliban — given that Prospero himself was unjustly usurped — demonstrates sophisticated critical thinking about moral contradiction.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively employs comparative character analysis: rather than treating Caliban and Prospero in isolation, it uses each to illuminate the other. The treatment of Ariel as a foil to Caliban — obedient versus resistant, rewarded versus punished — shows how supporting characters can be enlisted to reinforce a central argument about power and legitimacy.
Structure breakdown
The essay is organized into two named character studies. The Caliban section moves from his negative portrayal (the rape attempt, savagery) to the irony of Prospero's dominance, and finally to moments of Caliban's sympathy (his poetry, his prior claim to the island). The Prospero section traces his god-like control over the narrative, his psychological manipulation of other characters, and concludes by reframing the entire play as allegorical — with Prospero standing in for the playwright himself.
Caliban and the Paradox of Colonialism
One of the most striking characters in The Tempest is Caliban, the mythical being who plays a dominant role in the play's narrative. Unlike Prospero's servant Ariel, Caliban is portrayed as a savage and adversarial figure — yet he is also capable of speaking some of the most beautiful and stirring poetry in the entire play. Caliban thus illustrates many of the ambiguities of colonization: the island is more rightfully his than Prospero's, yet the play conspires to suggest that because of Prospero's more civilized, European behavior, Prospero somehow has a greater right to govern it.
This paradox is illustrated early on when Prospero summons Caliban. Caliban admits that he attempted to rape Miranda, intending to people the island with monstrous beings like himself. He is thus depicted as embodying many of the stereotypes commonly held about non-white, colonized peoples — that they desire European women and that they are savage and ungovernable. Miranda is portrayed as shrinking from Caliban in fear, and it is only because of Prospero's control over him that Caliban does not act in horrible and savage ways toward her. At the same time, the play makes clear that Caliban has a greater right to the island than Prospero does. Caliban reproaches Prospero, insisting the island is rightfully his, having belonged to his mother Sycorax before Prospero arrived.
There is a great deal of irony in Prospero's domination over Caliban, given that Prospero himself was once a victim of domination — usurped unfairly from his rightful position. In other words, Prospero does to Caliban precisely what others did to him. Yet the play does its best to portray Prospero's actions in a positive light. The first time the audience encounters Caliban, he acknowledges that Prospero taught him language, though he declares that the only benefit he finds in it is the ability to curse. He also credits Prospero with teaching him to identify the sun and moon and to name things — an almost godlike act of imposition. Caliban is portrayed as ungrateful for rejecting civilization and education, even though Prospero had no rightful claim to his island. When Caliban does attempt to reclaim the island, he does so foolishly, aligning himself with the least intelligent of the Europeans shipwrecked there. The play thus implicitly justifies Prospero's control, despite the fact that he came upon the island by accident and holds it by force alone.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.