This paper argues that Canada's dependence on oil sands extraction poses severe threats to the country's forests, freshwater supplies, and wildlife — and that the most effective remedy is the implementation of a carbon tax with a 100% dividend. Drawing on Andrew Nikiforuk's Tar Sands: Dirty Oil and the Future of a Continent, the paper surveys the environmental damage caused by bitumen mining along the Athabasca River, then evaluates Nikiforuk's "12 Steps to Energy Sanity." It concludes that a progressive carbon tax collected at the pump would reduce fossil fuel consumption, stimulate demand for clean energy products, and ultimately protect Canada's natural resources for future generations.
The paper demonstrates source-driven argumentation: it uses a single primary text (Nikiforuk's Tar Sands) as both an evidentiary base and a policy framework, selectively drawing on the author's "12 Steps" to build a focused thesis rather than summarizing the book wholesale. This selectivity — explaining why one step matters most — shows analytical judgment.
The paper opens with a thesis statement identifying the carbon tax as the most important environmental protection measure. It then builds the warrant for that claim across two evidence sections covering land, water, and air impacts of oil sands mining. A transitional paragraph addresses and dismisses the economic counterargument before the final two sections make the affirmative case for carbon taxation and consumer-driven market change. The conclusion circles back to the opening thesis.
Canada's current environmental state is in danger. The rich natural resources of this vast land are being sacrificed to feed an ongoing dependence on oil and petroleum products. There is no denying that the country is heavily impacted by energy strategies designed to extract various fossil fuels from its resource-rich landscape. In order to avoid further damage to Canada's environment, Andrew Nikiforuk provides what he calls "12 Steps to Energy Sanity" — one of which proves the most important for protecting Canada's environmental well-being: the implementation of a carbon tax to help wean Canadians off their dangerous addiction to oil, and thus protect the natural resources of the region for future generations.
Oil sands drilling has a devastating impact on Canada's natural resources. Mining for bitumen is a major source of deforestation in some of the country's most ecologically rich forested areas. The 3,000 square km of land allocated to oil sands mining is in direct danger of being devastated. Forest areas will be wiped out, leaving local wildlife vulnerable to serious and lasting harm. This trajectory secures a bleak future for Canada's diverse array of wildlife — one that may affect the country's natural resources for generations to come, long after active mining has ceased.
The use of extreme extraction measures — such as sandblasting, solvent injection, and fireflooding — is detrimental to the surrounding landscape and will prove impossible to fully remediate as the environmental damage compounds over future generations. The Athabasca oil sands region represents one of the most consequential examples of industrial-scale environmental disruption in North America.
There are serious concerns about how oil sands drilling affects Canada's limited freshwater and air supplies. The Athabasca River has seen much lower than normal water flows over the last few decades. Yet Canadian mining operations are still permitted to divert large volumes of its fresh water for the purpose of extracting bitumen. This has devastated fish populations and habitats, as fish are increasingly restricted from their natural feeding and breeding grounds each season as water levels decline. Without regulations preventing companies from drawing water when levels are at their lowest, the environmental damage will ultimately outweigh any economic gains from the bitumen being mined.
Water is an essential component of the oil-from-sand extraction process and has thus become a primary resource for oil drillers to exploit. With water levels already dangerously low, permitting further oil drilling to seize even more of Canada's freshwater supplies will only continue to endanger local wildlife by diminishing the size and quality of their habitats. After the water has been used in the extraction process, it cannot simply be returned to the environment — it is chemically tainted. Canadian oil drillers have displaced this toxic water directly adjacent to fresh water streams. Ponds of chemical-laden water now line the banks of the Athabasca River. According to Nikiforuk, "amazingly, the regulators have allowed industry to build nearly a dozen of them on either side of the Athabasca River," which is extremely risky because "this river, as noted, feeds the Mackenzie River Basin, which carries a fifth of Canada's fresh water to the Arctic Ocean" (Nikiforuk 83). This means that polluted water and toxic materials are being carried out to sea, affecting not only Canada's own resources but the broader global environment. Bitumen drilling also contributes significantly to air pollution in the region, compounding the environmental toll of oil sands development.
Nikiforuk, Andrew. Tar Sands: Dirty Oil and the Future of a Continent. Greystone / David Suzuki Foundation, 2010.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.