Capital Structure Choices for Multinational Foreign Subsidiaries
This paper examines the key factors influencing capital structure decisions for foreign subsidiaries of multinational corporations (MNCs). Drawing on Shapiro, Gropp, Desai, Foley, Hines, and Hennart, it outlines three principal approaches: adopting the parent company's capital structure, conforming to host-country norms, or minimizing the cost of capital. The paper discusses how country risk, local capital market conditions, taxation policy, and strategic considerations such as joint ventures shape financing choices. Real-world examples — including Pepsi's debt-financing strategy and Toyota's entry into the U.S. market — illustrate how firms apply these frameworks in practice. The paper concludes that most MNCs tailor capital structures to local conditions primarily to reduce financing costs.
- Introduction to Capital Structure for Foreign Subsidiaries: Key variables shaping subsidiary capital structure decisions
- Three Approaches to Capital Structure: Parent norms, host-country norms, or cost minimization
- The Role of Financing Sources and Country Risk: Why MNCs often finance subsidiaries outside the host country
- Leverage, Cost of Capital, and the Parent–Subsidiary Relationship: How leverage and default guarantees affect subsidiary financing
- Strategic Considerations: Joint Ventures and Market Entry: Joint ventures as tools to reduce capital costs and country risk
- Capital Structure in Practice: How firms actually apply capital structure strategies globally
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper moves logically from theoretical frameworks to real-world corporate examples, grounding abstract concepts in recognizable cases such as Pepsi and Toyota.
- It consistently situates each capital structure option within a cost-benefit lens, giving the analysis a coherent evaluative thread throughout.
- The use of multiple scholarly sources — Shapiro, Gropp, Desai et al., and Hennart — demonstrates engagement with both theoretical and empirical literature.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses comparative analysis to evaluate three distinct capital structure strategies, weighing each against practical constraints such as country risk, capital market development, and tax policy. By anchoring each strategy in cited evidence and then testing it against corporate case studies, the paper bridges theory and application — a strong model for finance and international business writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by introducing the variables affecting capital structure decisions for foreign subsidiaries. It then outlines three canonical approaches before discussing the importance of financing sources, country risk, and the parent–subsidiary leverage relationship. A section on strategic considerations — particularly joint ventures — follows, supported by Hennart's empirical study. The paper closes with a synthesis of how most firms behave in practice, reinforcing the cost-minimization model as the dominant approach.
Introduction to Capital Structure for Foreign Subsidiaries
A number of different factors influence the choice of capital structure for foreign subsidiaries. Shapiro (p. 517) points out that the choice of discount rates for foreign subsidiary projects is affected by variables such as the types of corporate proxies available for the foreign subsidiary, the project and market risk associated with the subsidiary and company relative to the parent company and home market, and differences in country risk. Shapiro also argues that the capital structure of the foreign subsidiary should be determined within the context of the firm's desired worldwide capital structure (p. 528).
Three Approaches to Capital Structure
There are essentially three choices for multinational companies when determining the capital structure of a foreign subsidiary: adopt the capital structure of the parent company, reflect the capitalization norms of the foreign country, or take advantage of opportunities to minimize the MNC's cost of capital. Gropp (2002, p. 51) reported that most German firms take the latter approach, particularly when local taxation policy encourages one form of financing over another. The cost-of-capital minimization approach could also extend to the degree of access the foreign subsidiary has to its local capital markets, the cost of which can vary significantly between countries.
The Role of Financing Sources and Country Risk
Another key consideration is the source of financing. In many countries, MNCs have significant incentive to utilize financing sources from outside the host country. Capital markets may be underdeveloped, or they may be subject to weak creditor protections — both scenarios significantly increasing the cost of borrowing. Subsidiaries that face substantially higher country risk may also choose to finance outside the host country (Desai, Foley, & Hines, 2003, p. 2).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.