This paper examines the prospect of pursuing a career in psychology in a metropolitan context, drawing on primary-source interviews with three individuals: a psychology student, a practicing psychologist, and a social worker. Guided by principles of local and primary-source research, the author outlines an interview methodology and presents findings from each subject. The interviews reveal both the personal motivations and professional challenges associated with careers in psychology and social work, including concerns about job availability, patient preferences for medication over therapy, and the rewards of communication-based helping professions. A sample interview questionnaire is also provided.
Upon exiting college, many students still ask themselves whether they have studied the right thing and whether their degree will eventually lead them to the right job. Many individuals today struggle with the consequences of an ongoing recession, and the reality that despite years of study and thousands of dollars in loans, jobs are not readily available upon graduation. In order to prepare for this uncertainty, many students are choosing the medical field. To examine what it means to choose a career in the medical field, this paper focuses specifically on psychology, considers the context of a metropolitan area such as New York City, and draws on a series of interviews conducted to gather insight into whether this would be a fruitful pursuit.
In order to conduct this type of interview, one must first prepare a list of potential interviewees and questions. Goshgarian states that both primary and secondary sources are vital to preparing one's research, and stresses the importance of pursuing primary sources in particular. Furthermore, local research must make use of primary sources, since most of this kind of information is not necessarily available online. Initial questions can be designed to find experts in the community who can speak to the pros and cons of the issue being examined, or to identify other local sources — especially media sources such as newspapers or local television stations. According to Goshgarian, one can even consult a political group or local students, who are often eager to share their opinions.
For the purposes of this particular subject, three interviewees were selected: a psychology student at a local college, a practicing psychologist, and a social worker. These three individuals hold varied enough perspectives to provide a well-rounded set of information. Examining the viewpoints of both a student and an established professional offers insight into the pros and cons of the profession before one even begins to study it. Because this subject is career-related and inherently subjective, multiple interviews at both levels are necessary, and relatively probing questions must be posed. The field of psychology as a career encompasses a wide range of specializations and work environments, making diverse perspectives especially valuable.
Subject number one, the student, states that his inclination toward psychology has been present from a young age, and that he has always loved analyzing people and helping them see things they do not necessarily recognize on their own. However, he also notes that it is quite difficult to reconcile this interest with the realities of academic study, especially given the limited promises of finding a job after graduation. His advice, nonetheless, is that if one is reasonably certain of one's passion for the subject, one ought to pursue it.
The second subject, the practicing psychologist, states that psychology is her top priority, but that it can be difficult to do meaningful work when patients do not truly want to engage in talk therapy. She also confides that many patients simply wish to take medication in order to address their problems more quickly.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.