Carlzon's Change Leadership at SAS and Linjeflyg
This paper examines Jan Carlzon's change leadership strategy as applied at Linjeflyg and Scandinavian Airlines System (SAS), analyzing eight key dimensions of his approach. The paper explores how Carlzon created urgency, built organizational buy-in, articulated a clear and simple vision, communicated effectively, empowered employees, managed wins, avoided premature declarations of victory, and drove lasting cultural change. Drawing on Carlzon's actions at both organizations, the paper demonstrates how his philosophy of inclusive, communication-driven transformation produced measurable improvements in service quality and organizational flexibility across successive waves of change.
- Creating Urgency and Engaging Employees: Carlzon's early moves to signal urgent change
- Building Organizational Buy-In: Engaging staff and managers in the change process
- Crafting a Clear Vision and Strategy: Simple vision aligned with specific organizational goals
- Communication as a Leadership Tool: Clear, repeated messaging and removal of communication barriers
- Empowerment and Structural Reform: Removing bureaucracy and enabling managerial decision-making
- Managing Wins and Sustaining Momentum: Mixed record on reinforcing short-term wins
- Avoiding Premature Victory and Preparing for Change Waves: Training and flexibility for successive rounds of change
- Embedding Lasting Cultural Change: Making new behaviors the permanent organizational norm
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses a clear numbered framework, systematically addressing each dimension of Carlzon's change leadership approach without losing the logical thread between sections.
- It grounds abstract change management principles in concrete organizational examples drawn from both Linjeflyg and SAS, making the analysis tangible and comparative.
- The paper acknowledges limitations in Carlzon's approach — for instance, the limited reinforcement of small wins — demonstrating critical thinking rather than uncritical praise.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied analytical writing: it takes an established change management framework and systematically evaluates a real leader's actions against each component. By moving methodically through eight dimensions, the writer shows how theoretical criteria can be used to assess practical leadership performance, including both strengths and gaps.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into eight thematic sections, each addressing one aspect of Carlzon's change strategy — urgency, buy-in, vision, communication, empowerment, wins, avoiding premature victory, and cultural change. Each section uses parallel structure: it introduces the principle, applies it to Carlzon's behavior, and evaluates the outcome. The conclusion of each section feeds naturally into the next, building a cumulative portrait of Carlzon's leadership philosophy.
Creating Urgency and Engaging Employees
Carlzon established a strong sense of urgency with his moves, and this was evident at both SAS and Linjeflyg. On his first day at Linjeflyg, he called a company-wide meeting that included all employees from across the country. He also met quickly with employees at SAS after his appointment, making clear that changes were coming. His first order of business was to engage employees in the change process before the specific changes had even been identified. In doing so, he encouraged the workforce to become part of the process from the outset.
The second step was to quickly establish the market and competitive realities. Senior managers were promptly asked to provide assessments of the key customer groups, and in doing so, Carlzon was able to identify the central issues. Strategies were then formed on the basis of these findings. The analysis was largely informal, which allowed it to be conducted with a sense of urgency — distilling down to basic truths rather than becoming lost in the details.
Building Organizational Buy-In
Carlzon took the approach that the entire organization needed to buy into the change effort for it to succeed. The first step in his change process was to engage the broader workforce. He gathered information from his senior managers, ensuring they would be quickly involved. Although Carlzon directed the process, he made few of the decisions himself. When he did make decisions, he was essentially confirming what many employees already felt about the situation, rather than imposing a vision that did not correspond with their own experience. This clarity of vision was key, because the groups within the company charged with implementing change were able to come together under a common understanding of what needed to be done.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.