Challenges of Transitioning to Electronic Medical Records
This paper examines the benefits and challenges associated with implementing electronic medical records (EMRs) and healthcare management systems (HMS) in clinical settings. Drawing on Lewin's Change Management Model, the paper outlines the unfreezing, change, and refreezing phases necessary for successful adoption. It also addresses common barriers including provider resistance, system reliability issues, interoperability failures, and the financial and operational costs of transitioning from obsolete platforms. The paper argues that careful vendor screening, adequate training investment, and strong organizational communication are essential to achieving a successful and lasting transition to modern healthcare technology.
- Introduction to EMRs and Healthcare Management Systems: Benefits and rationale for adopting EMR systems
- Change Management and Staff Buy-In: Lewin's model applied to EMR implementation
- Reliability and Interoperability Barriers: Technical obstacles that impede successful EHR adoption
- System Obsolescence and Vendor Support: Risks of choosing systems lacking long-term vendor support
- Costs and Compounding Challenges of Transition: Financial and organizational costs of switching EHR platforms
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its argument in a recognized organizational framework—Lewin's Change Management Model—giving the analysis a clear theoretical backbone rather than relying solely on anecdote or opinion.
- It balances the benefits of EMRs with a realistic account of implementation barriers, creating a nuanced, credible argument rather than a one-sided advocacy piece.
- Citations from the WHO, peer-reviewed medical informatics research, and trade publications lend the paper multi-source authority appropriate for a health informatics topic.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of a theoretical framework as an organizing lens. By mapping the EMR transition process onto Lewin's three-stage model (unfreezing, change, refreezing), the author transforms a practical problem into an analytically structured argument. This technique—selecting a model and applying it systematically before identifying where real-world cases diverge from ideal conditions—is a core skill in applied health administration writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing the value proposition of EMRs, then applies Lewin's model to the staffing and communication dimensions of implementation. Subsequent paragraphs pivot to external and technical barriers—WHO-cited reliability issues and interoperability gaps—before closing with the compounding financial and practical costs of system obsolescence. Each paragraph advances a distinct obstacle, building a cumulative case that successful EMR adoption requires holistic planning rather than technology investment alone.
Introduction to EMRs and Healthcare Management Systems
Healthcare management systems (HMS) and electronic medical records (EMRs) have been widely praised for significantly improving patient safety and quality of care. They allow healthcare institutions to maintain more accurate, centralized patient databases and ensure that a patient's full medical history is accessible even when the patient is unresponsive and family members are unavailable. Prior treatments, current and past medications, and patient allergies can all be retrieved with a simple click. However, transitioning to such systems is not always straightforward and often requires a substantial investment of time and money.
Change Management and Staff Buy-In
From a staffing perspective, effective change management is essential to ensure a successful transition. One useful framework for understanding organizational change is Lewin's Change Management Model, which proposes that organizations must first undergo an unfreezing phase, during which key stakeholders are convinced of the need for change. In healthcare settings, where providers must balance highly stressful workloads with learning a new system, clearly communicating the urgency and rationale for the change is especially critical.
The second phase is the change stage itself. To generate genuine buy-in from providers — who are, in practice, the individuals most directly navigating the transition — organizations must invest meaningful time, money, and energy into the implementation process to make it as smooth and successful as possible. Only after this phase is fully realized can the third stage, refreezing, take hold, embedding the new procedures — such as accessing medical records electronically — as routine second nature ("Lewin's Change Management Model," 2018).
Reliability and Interoperability Barriers
Even when management is firmly committed to supporting the shift to EMRs or other forward-thinking technological systems, problems can still arise that delay or prevent a successful outcome. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), electronic records "improve patient management, clinic efficiency and health outcomes" by ensuring coherency and continuity of care. This benefit is particularly significant as people become more geographically mobile and frequently transition between multiple providers (Jawhari et al., 2016, p. 247). Nevertheless, insufficient system reliability can frustrate providers, as can a lack of interoperability between specific EHR platforms and other available systems (Jawhari et al., 2016).
References
Jawhari, B., Keenan, L., Zakus, D., Ludwick, D., Isaac, A., Saleh, A., & Hayward, R. (2016). Barriers and facilitators to Electronic Medical Record (EMR) use in an urban slum. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 94, 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.07.015
Lewin's change management model. (2018). Mind Tools. Retrieved from https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newPPM_94.htm
Schaeffer, J. (2013). Breaking up (with an EHR) is hard to do. For The Record, 25(14), 22. Retrieved from http://www.fortherecordmag.com/archives/1013p22.shtml
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.