This paper examines the role of the borderlands and Los Angeles in the development of Chicano culture, focusing on the 1933 California cotton strike as a pivotal historical event. It traces the economic conditions that drew Mexican migrants to the southwestern United States as low-wage agricultural laborers, the drastic wage cuts brought on by the Great Depression, and the organized labor strike by roughly 12,000 workers in Kern, Kings, and Tulare counties. The paper analyzes the violent suppression of the strike, its limited impact, and the intensification of racial tensions that followed — arguing that the attitudes toward Mexican immigrants revealed in 1933 continue to shape debates over immigrant rights today.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
The paper demonstrates effective use of historical contextualization — situating a specific labor dispute within broader economic, racial, and cultural forces. By referencing the collapse of Southern cotton after slavery and comparing growers' treatment of strikers to the treatment of enslaved workers, the author draws meaningful historical analogies that strengthen the argument without overstating it.
The paper opens with a framing statement about Chicano identity before narrowing to the economics of borderlands cotton production. It then traces the arc from prosperity to Depression-era wage cuts, through labor organizing and the strike itself, to its violent suppression and long-term consequences. The conclusion explicitly bridges 1933 to the present immigration debate, giving the essay a clear thesis-to-resolution shape. Citations from Guerin-Gonzales, Hamilton, and Sanchez provide academic grounding throughout.
Mexican-Americans are an integral part of American society at large. Chicanos continue to be engulfed in an age-old struggle to retain their cultural heritage and identity while at the same time fitting into mainstream American culture. The borderlands and the city of Los Angeles are significant places in the study of the development of Chicano culture. Historical events in the borderlands have played a significant role in shaping Chicano culture into its present form. This paper explores the effects of the Cotton Strike of 1933 on the current tensions regarding Mexican-American migrant workers today.
Mexicans crossed the borderlands to seek jobs in the United States, primarily filling low-wage labor positions. Most migrants remained in the border states of California, New Mexico, Arizona, and Texas. They were considered the ideal employees and were seen as posing no threat to the native population, according to the Arizona Cotton Growers' Association (Sanchez, p. 96).
Cotton production is labor intensive and difficult without a sufficient supply of unskilled labor. It requires a long growing season and warm temperatures, and has the potential for small profit margins — meaning producers must seek to cut costs wherever possible. The loss of slave labor in the southeastern United States brought about the downfall of the cotton industry in that region. However, the availability of low-wage Mexican labor in the borderlands made it possible to fill the gap left by the old Southern cotton empire (Hamilton, p. 103). Mexican migrant workers thus enabled the development of the cotton industry in the southwestern United States.
The cotton industry provided one of the highest income sources for migrant workers from the turn of the century until the Great Depression. A cotton picker could expect to earn $60.75 per month prior to the Depression (Guerin-Gonzales, p. 121). That wage dropped to $30.12 in 1930 (Guerin-Gonzales, p. 121). Migrant workers were not the only ones to experience such a drastic reduction in wages — like many other unskilled laborers across America, these workers began to organize labor unions in an attempt to maintain their economic position.
When Mexican migrant workers began to organize, their efforts were rejected as illegitimate by many owners and government agencies. Workers were threatened with intimidation, violence, and expulsion from the country (Guerin-Gonzales, p. 121).
You’re 42% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.