Christian Theodicy: Free Will, Evil, and the Cross
This essay examines the problem of evil from a Christian theological perspective, arguing that evil is best understood not through philosophical abstraction alone but through the full narrative of Scripture and Christian doctrine. Drawing on thinkers such as Alvin Plantinga, C. S. Lewis, N. T. Wright, and John Feinberg, the paper traces evil's origin to the free will of God's creatures, its perpetuation through Original Sin, and its ultimate defeat through the sacrificial death of Christ. The essay contends that both moral and natural evils are connected to humanity's fall, that the free will defense adequately addresses natural evil within a Christian framework, and that the Cross represents the decisive response to evil's apparent triumph over goodness.
- Introduction: The Problem of Evil and the Christian Context: Christianity's unique answer to why evil exists
- The Cross as Symbol and Entry Point: Suffering as the path to God through the Cross
- Original Sin, Covenant, and the Sacrifice Motif: Eden's fall and God's covenantal response to sin
- Free Will, Divine Creation, and the Drama of Human Choice: Plantinga on God, freedom, and created beings
- Natural Evil and the Free Will Defense: How Original Sin explains natural disasters and suffering
- Conclusion: Faith, Christ, and the Overcoming of Evil: Christ as the only answer to insurmountable evil
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay builds a coherent apologetic argument by integrating Scripture, patristic themes, and modern philosophical sources (Plantinga, Lewis, Feinberg, Wright) within a unified Christian framework, giving the analysis both theological depth and academic grounding.
- The author effectively anticipates and refutes counterarguments — particularly Feinberg's objection that the free will defense fails to account for natural evils — by returning to the Genesis narrative and demonstrating how Original Sin connects moral and natural disorder.
- The use of the Cross as a structuring metaphor unifies the essay thematically, linking the discussion of suffering, sacrifice, and redemption across sections without losing argumentative focus.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models the technique of theological rebuttal: it presents a philosophical objection (e.g., Feinberg on natural evil), acknowledges its force, and then systematically dismantles it by appealing to a broader doctrinal framework. This move — concede, contextualize, refute — is characteristic of strong apologetics writing and demonstrates awareness of the opponent's position before responding.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens by situating the problem of evil philosophically before asserting Christianity's superior explanatory power. Subsequent sections treat the Cross as the theological centerpiece, then trace evil's origin through Original Sin and covenant history. The paper then engages the free will defense directly, responds to the natural evil objection, and concludes by affirming that faith in Christ is the only fully satisfying resolution to the problem. Six sections move from diagnosis to defense to resolution.
Introduction: The Problem of Evil and the Christian Context
The problem of evil is something everyone must face sooner or later. As Schlesinger points out, philosophers want to understand "why there is any suffering in the world at all."1 The difficulty with a purely philosophical approach to suffering, however, is that it does not reveal the whole story — or the whole picture — of why suffering (evil) exists. Religion, on the other hand, does provide that whole story, and depending on the religion, the account will differ somewhat.
Christianity teaches that evil is a result of sin — that it did not enter the world of its own accord, nor did God create it, but rather that His creatures chose it of their own free will. The choice to pursue evil, defined as an absence of the good, altered God's world — or at least humanity's perception of it. Prior to the fall, man lived in happiness in the Garden of Paradise. His sin led to his expulsion from that happy state into a world full of danger, suffering, and death. He now had to face the repercussions of his actions — that is, the evil of his sin, made apparent to him in all of nature.
Yet God did not abandon man to evil, lest man despair of ever returning to God, his origin and his end. God even provided man with the prescription for overcoming evil. This was demonstrated by Christ, Who went into the desert for a period of fasting to show that we must strengthen and prepare our spirits for battle with evil. Even Christ was tempted by Satan — not once but three times. Because He had conditioned Himself to do battle against the spirit of evil, Christ prevailed.
Today, however, Satan uses different tactics in trying to pull souls away from God. He argues that since he exists and evil reigns across the earth, a good God must not exist — for if a good God did exist and was all-powerful, why would so much evil be permitted? That is the central question with regard to evil today. It is a question that can ultimately only be understood in the Christian context, for it is the Christian religion that gives the fullest and most meaningful expression of the problem of evil and how that problem is resolved — for it was Christ who defeated death and Satan once and for all through the Cross.
Bibliography
Adams, Marilyn McCord, and Robert Merrihew Adams. The Problem of Evil. Oxford University Press, 1990.
Feinberg, John S. The Many Faces of Evil. Crossway Books, 2004.
Lewis, C. S. The Problem of Pain. Samizdat University Press, 2016.
Plantinga, Alvin. God, Freedom and Evil. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1974.
Schlesinger, G. N. "The Problem of Evil and the Problem of Injustice." Tradition: A Journal of Orthodox Jewish Thought 13, no. 2 (1972): 42–51.
Wright, N. T. Evil and the Justice of God. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2006.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.