This paper surveys six major learning theories relevant to classroom instruction: constructivism, brain-based learning, attribution theory, emotional intelligence, multiple intelligences, and learned helplessness. Drawing on foundational theorists including Piaget, Bransford, Weiner, Goleman, Gardner, and Seligman, the paper explains how each theory conceptualizes how students acquire and retain knowledge. It also outlines practical teaching strategies derived from each framework and argues that, while no single theory can serve all learners, teachers who understand this range of approaches can create more inclusive, motivating, and effective learning environments.
The paper demonstrates effective comparative survey writing: it introduces each framework on its own terms, identifies shared themes (active learning, self-efficacy, individual difference), and uses those themes to build toward a cumulative argument about inclusive pedagogy. This technique is especially useful in education courses where students must show command of multiple competing frameworks simultaneously.
The paper opens with a brief orienting introduction naming all six theories. It then devotes one to two paragraphs to each theory in sequence—constructivism, brain-based learning, attribution theory, emotional intelligence, multiple intelligences, and learned helplessness—before closing with a short integrative conclusion. The structure is clean and parallel, making it easy to follow across a wide range of theoretical content.
Several theories have been proposed for helping students learn most effectively in a classroom setting, including constructivism, brain-based learning, attribution theory, emotional intelligence, and multiple intelligences. There is also the concept of "learned helplessness," which places a significant barrier on learning. It is important for teachers to consider each of these frameworks and how each fits into their own educational philosophy. Students need to be motivated to gain as much knowledge as possible, yet teachers must also feel comfortable with a given learning style in order to achieve the best results.
The theory of constructivism (Piaget, 1950) is based on observation and scientific research about the way people learn. It recognizes that individuals construct or build their own understanding and knowledge of the world through their experiences and reflection on those experiences. When individuals encounter something new, they must find a way to reconcile that occurrence with their previous thoughts and experiences. The new encounter may confirm what they already believe, or it may completely change their prior ideas. In constructivism, people create their own knowledge by responding to observations, asking questions, exploring, and assessing.
The constructivist view of learning in the classroom encompasses a variety of teaching methods. Generally, it involves motivating students to actively use techniques, tools, and processes—such as experiments, teamwork, and problem solving—to gain new knowledge or confirm existing knowledge, and then to review and discuss what was learned and how it affected earlier beliefs. The teacher ensures that students' concepts are understood and guides them through activities so they can build on their knowledge base.
Students in a constructivist environment are encouraged to continually assess the way in which activities are helping them learn. The goal is that through this constant self-questioning and reflection on their own learning strategies, they become expert, self-directed learners who acquire ever-expanding techniques for ongoing learning—in other words, they learn how to learn. Rather than simply delivering facts, the teacher provides an environment conducive to designing, developing, and expanding knowledge.
Another important framework, brain-based learning (Bransford, 2000), emerges from neuroscience research suggesting how the human brain acquires, processes, and retains information at different stages of development. It is a biologically driven structure for teaching and for acquiring learning behaviors. As with constructivist education, a variety of techniques can be applied under this theory, many of which involve helping students connect learning to real-life experiences. Brain-based learning is an all-encompassing theory that incorporates educational innovations such as mastery learning, learning styles, multiple intelligences, cooperative learning, practical simulations, experiential learning, problem-based learning, and movement education.
Some of the principles guiding brain-based education include: (1) the brain can perform several activities at once as a parallel processor; (2) the brain simultaneously perceives parts and wholes; (3) the brain stores and retrieves information across multiple areas and neural pathways; (4) the desire for learning in humans is innate; (5) learning involves the whole body, not just the mind; (6) emotion is critically linked to gaining meaning and memory; (7) understanding occurs most deeply when it is integrated into spatial memory rather than learned by rote; (8) learning is much more than the mere acquisition of facts; (9) the human brain is socially inclined and develops better in the company of others; and (10) every brain is unique (Caine, 1997).
Based on these principles, certain teaching techniques work particularly well. Orchestrated immersion, for example, submerges students in a rich learning experience, such as transforming a classroom into a jungle setting. Relaxed alertness describes a motivating yet non-threatening environment—for instance, listening to soothing music while reflecting on emotional reactions. In active processing, students internalize already-acquired information through group learning, stimulating environments, or enriching activities such as art or dance. Under this theory, students are assessed in a variety of ways and often maintain portfolios for self-assessment and to document their growth over time.
Attribution theory (Weiner, 1974) incorporates behavior modification, motivating students to learn because the results make them feel more self-confident. It also draws on cognitive and self-efficacy theories, in that students' current self-perceptions significantly affect how they interpret their efforts and their ability to replicate those efforts in the future. Students evaluate their learning in terms of success and failure. They believe they may succeed or fail due to factors within themselves or within their external environment. The cause of success or failure can be stable—meaning the outcome will likely be the same when performed again—or unstable, meaning the outcome will likely differ. Success or failure may also be controllable, meaning the person can alter the outcome, or uncontrollable, meaning it cannot easily be changed.
Students tend to interpret their environment in ways that maintain a positive self-image, attributing their successes or failures in ways that support their sense of self-worth. Therefore, if teachers want students to value their educational activities, they need to help students believe they are competent learners and that their failures are due to some other controllable factor.
Students should not attribute their successes entirely to innate ability; they need to be continually challenged and to believe that additional effort is required. The ideal attribution for success is: "I succeeded because my efforts made me more competent and I worked hard." Conversely, if students fail, they are likely to continue failing when they attribute that failure to a lack of appropriate effort. Teachers must therefore help students reframe their understanding of success and failure. In the classroom, teachers should identify areas in which students perceive themselves as successful and draw explicit connections between those areas of strength and the topic currently under study.
The theory of emotional intelligence (Goleman, 2006), or EQ, argues that IQ—the traditional measure of intelligence—must be expanded to include other dimensions of learning capacity. Successful learning requires more than cognitive intelligence alone. Emotional intelligence incorporates research from behavioral, emotional, and communications theories, including neuro-linguistic programming, transactional analysis, and empathy. In this framework, the success of learning rests on five premises: (1) knowing one's own emotions; (2) managing those emotions; (3) motivating oneself; (4) recognizing and understanding other people's emotions; and (5) managing relationships, or the emotions of others. A person's emotional awareness and ability to handle feelings will significantly determine success in future relationships and employment.
Teachers cannot realistically apply all of these theories in a single classroom setting, but they can recognize that students do not all learn the same way and implement a variety of approaches that give every student the opportunity to learn in at least one way that matches their strengths. In doing so, students can acquire knowledge about themselves, others, and the world at large—and, just as importantly, develop the self-confidence and the belief that they are capable of success.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.