This paper examines Coca-Cola's competitive strategy in Brazil's rapidly expanding soft drink market — the world's third largest — against rivals including PepsiCo, indigenous guarana brands, and beer producers. Drawing on Wall Street Journal reporting and marketing trade sources, the paper traces how economic stabilization under Brazil's Real Plan unleashed mass consumer spending, intensifying the cola wars. It analyzes Coca-Cola's use of cultural marketing, its partnership with promotional agency KLP around the FIFA World Cup, its bottler network, and the strategic threat posed by the proposed Brahma-Antarctica merger that would create beverage giant AmBev. The paper argues that success in third-world markets hinges on understanding local culture and linking products to national symbols.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
Brazil is a hot country with poor water quality and 140 million thirsty people. It is perhaps unsurprising, then, that a fierce war has broken out to persuade Brazilians to drink one kind of cola over another. At stake is a $2 billion soft drink market — already the world's third largest — in which the executives of Coca-Cola Co. and PepsiCo Inc. have enormous confidence. Since 1994, the working-class consumer market has exploded in Brazil following the launch of the government's Real Plan — named after the new currency — which reduced monthly inflation to less than 1% from a previous rate of 50%.
Multinational enterprises (MNEs) from different home regions now routinely confront one another in third-world markets. In Brazil, U.S.-based MNEs such as Coca-Cola and Pepsi compete with European soft drink brands and indigenous beverages. The central hypothesis of this paper is that the foreign MNE that wins the competition in a third-world market is the one that best understands the local market and knows how to link its product to nationalistic symbols. This paper discusses the marketing of Coca-Cola in Brazil and examines why Coca-Cola leads the soft drink competition there.
Coca-Cola has been well established in Brazil for many years; however, in recent years it has faced competition not only from Pepsi, but also from indigenous drinks such as guaraná and beer. In the 1980s, Pepsi launched an attack on the cola market by entering a bottling and marketing agreement with Companhia Cervejaria Brahma, Brazil's biggest brewer, fundamentally challenging the equation that cola meant Coke.
Coca-Cola was able to anticipate and successfully counter Pepsi's moves. When Pepsi introduced screw-top bottles, Coke responded by claiming that such caps would allow the bubbles to fizzle away — yet it soon launched its own screw tops in two states, prompting Pepsi to taunt that "the other guy blinked again." There were reports of each company stealing the other's bottles. Pepsi then launched a Tina Turner publicity campaign, to which Coke hurriedly responded with Sting before signing up Xuxa, a beloved blond pop idol in Brazil.
Beyond Pepsi, Coke also faces a significant threat from small, independent beverage producers capitalizing on cheap, non-returnable bottles and Brazil's deep-rooted affection for guaraná. A boom in low-priced soft drinks — mostly guaraná flavors — has cut deeply into Coke's flagship cola's Brazilian market share, which fell to 46% from 58% in 1993. While Coke countered with two guaraná brands of its own, patriotic Brazilian consumers were unenthusiastic about foreign-made guaraná. Coke's fiercest Brazilian rival in this segment, guaraná bottler Cia. Antarctica — which controls one quarter of the market for the Amazonian beverage — has ridiculed the soft drink giant in TV advertisements effectively accusing Coke of "guaraná envy."
Beer represents a third competitive front. In the first two years of the Real Plan, Brazilian beer consumption increased from 8.84 gallons per capita to 13 gallons. However, beer sales subsequently leveled off as consumers took on debt. Key to one brewer's growth was Kaiser's ability to piggyback on Coca-Cola's distribution network across this continent-sized nation. "Building a distribution system is very difficult," said Antonio Carlos Ribeiro da Silva, Kaiser's president. "The costs are very high." Kaiser's good fortune in not having to contract third-party distributors — as its rivals do — is one reason it boasted the highest return on equity in the industry.
Kaiser's emphasis on maintaining a clean corporate image at times appeared self-serving, yet the company took it seriously. When rival Brahma launched an advertising campaign featuring a young soccer star, Kaiser publicly rebuked its competitor. "We didn't like the fact they were using an idol of Brazilian youth to sell beer," said Kaiser's Mr. Jardim.
Inevitably, the marketing activity surrounding the Brazilian national football team is frenetic. At the center of the action was an unexpected and familiar name: London-based promotional marketing agency KLP. Coca-Cola's Brazilian office hired KLP to handle all of its promotions before and after the FIFA World Cup.
The agency's leader, who left her position as new business manager for KLP in London to set up the Rio-based team, emphasized that understanding how sales promotion fits within Brazilian culture was essential before planning the campaign. "Brazilians are extremely receptive to promotions, but they are very cynical about promises to win prizes. They have been misled so many times in the past that they do not trust promotions unless they can see an immediate benefit, with no catches. Therefore, everything has to be communicated simply and expressed very visually. That means playability and collectibles are particularly effective — techniques that might seem naive and basic in Europe," she explained.
Unlike audiences in other countries who may simply be grateful to see their team qualify, Brazilians expect nothing less than perfection. Football is a source of intense national pride, and throughout June, 160 million Brazilians would will their team toward the final. The pressure on the players was intensified by the possibility of Brazil becoming the first country to win the World Cup five times.
As well as adapting to these cultural nuances, Coke and KLP had to devise a strategy that the bottlers could buy into — a crucial challenge, since the 26 bottling groups around the country are the key to reaching every corner of the massive Brazilian market. "It's very unusual to get all the bottlers involved with a campaign — they used to run their own regional promotions — so you need ideas that are strong enough to bring all of them in," noted the KLP team. The stakes were high: "Good promotions can have a dynamite effect here, with 15% increases in sales not unheard of. That's the kind of increase that can have a dramatic effect on the business and affect the share price."
One of the first tasks was to develop a theme for all World Cup-related promotions. KLP focused on the idea that this was Brazil's chance to become the first team to win five World Cups. It devised the Sede de Cinco strapline, meaning "Thirst for Five." Coke embraced the line so enthusiastically that it was used across all areas of its Brazilian World Cup campaign, with the logo appearing on every Coca-Cola can and promotional item, as well as in McCann-Erickson's television advertising.
"Coke's bottler network and market scale advantage"
"Brahma-Antarctica merger risk and beer distribution strategy"
Kaiser's motivation for opposing the creation of a company with a 72% share of the domestic beer market is straightforward. Less obvious is the threat the Brahma-Antarctica merger poses to Coke specifically. Because Brazilians are unusual in their cultural approach to beer — treating it as a soft drink that happens to be alcoholic — the most successful beverage sellers in Brazil are those that distribute soda and beer together. Critics argue that the image-conscious Coke has failed to grasp this fully, at a cost to its market share.
Many analysts believe Coke has the ability to meet the AmBev threat, but argue it will need to compete aggressively in the beer segment to do so. That strategy was already working with great success for Spaipa in Curitiba, as noted above. Coke's experience across different Brazilian regions demonstrates that the integration of beer and soft drink distribution is not merely a tactical option but a strategic necessity in this culturally distinctive market.
Coca-Cola's experience in Brazil confirms the paper's central hypothesis: in a competitive third-world market, the multinational enterprise that succeeds is the one that most deeply understands local culture and connects its brand to national symbols. From the "Thirst for Five" World Cup campaign to the navigation of guaraná nationalism and the strategic use of beer distribution networks, Coca-Cola has demonstrated that cultural intelligence and local partnership are as important as product quality and pricing. As the competitive landscape continues to evolve — particularly with the emergence of AmBev — sustaining that advantage will require ongoing commitment to the nuances of the Brazilian consumer market.
You’re 80% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.