Why College Athletes Should Be Paid for Their Work
This paper argues that college athletes deserve financial compensation for their labor. Drawing on data about time commitments, NCAA revenue, and the historical precedent of coach salaries, the paper makes the case that college athletes function as full-time employees of their institutions without receiving any corresponding pay. It proposes several remedies—including direct payment, unionization, and performance-based bonuses—and calls on fans to apply public pressure through organized viewership boycotts and social media activism to prompt change in college athletics policy.
- Introduction: The Unfairness of Unpaid College Athletics: Athletes generate revenue but receive no pay
- College Athletes Work Full-Time Without Pay: Athletes log over 43 hours weekly without compensation
- NCAA Revenue and the Hypocrisy of Amateurism: NCAA earns billions while denying athlete pay
- Proposed Solutions for Compensating College Athletes: Direct pay, unionization, and performance bonuses proposed
- How Fans and the Public Can Take Action: Boycotts and social media can pressure administrators
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses concrete statistics—such as the 43.3 hours per week Division I football players devote to their sport—to ground the argument in verifiable data rather than opinion alone.
- Draws an effective historical analogy between the evolution of coach compensation and the ongoing denial of pay to athletes, illustrating the inconsistency in NCAA policy.
- Proposes multiple actionable solutions (direct pay, unionization, performance bonuses) rather than stopping at critique, giving the argument practical weight.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper employs a problem-solution structure with embedded persuasive reasoning. It establishes a grievance, supports it with cited evidence, proposes remedies, and ends with a call to action—a classic organizational strategy for advocacy writing that mirrors formats used in policy argumentation.
Structure breakdown
The paper is divided into four logical sections: (1) framing the problem of unpaid athlete labor; (2) presenting evidence through time demands, revenue figures, and coach salary comparisons; (3) offering three concrete solutions—payment, unionization, and bonuses; and (4) calling on fans to apply civic pressure through boycotts and social media. Citations from Forbes, the Huffington Post, and the Washington Post support each major claim.
Introduction: The Unfairness of Unpaid College Athletics
College athletes devote enormous amounts of time and energy to athletic competition—so much, in fact, that they are routinely considered athletes first and students second. They generate extraordinary revenue for their institutions, as college sports have become a major industry. Yet these athletes receive no pay for their services or their entertainment value. In a society that values equity and fairness, this arrangement should strike everyone as particularly unjust.
College athletes should be paid. They function, in nearly every practical sense, as employees of their colleges—and it is time that compensation reflected that reality.
College Athletes Work Full-Time Without Pay
Being a college athlete is a full-time job. The typical Division I college football player devotes 43.3 hours per week to his sport—3.3 hours more than the standard 40-hour workweek that most full-time, salaried Americans put in (Hartnett). Yet the college athlete receives no compensation for these hours, even as the colleges themselves profit handsomely when advertising revenue rolls in (Edelman).
The sheer volume of time demanded of these athletes makes the claim that they are primarily students increasingly difficult to sustain. When an individual consistently works more hours than a typical full-time employee, the absence of any wage is not a technicality—it is an injustice.
NCAA Revenue and the Hypocrisy of Amateurism
While the NCAA maintains that college athletes are students rather than employees, the NCAA tournament requires those same "students" to miss classes in order to participate in nationally televised games that generate enormous advertising revenue for their schools. The scale of this revenue is striking: the college athletics industry brings in approximately $11 billion annually—a figure that rivals professional sports revenues (Edelman).
A useful historical parallel further exposes the inconsistency in the NCAA's position. College coaches were once unpaid, and for the same reasons now cited to justify not paying athletes. Today, however, college coaches earn substantial salaries. Kentucky's John Calipari, for instance, earns millions of dollars each year as head coach—yet if a player accepts even a small payment, he risks investigation by federal authorities (Edelman). The double standard is difficult to ignore.
Works Cited
Edelman, Marc. "21 Reasons Why Student-Athletes Are Employees and Should Be Allowed to Unionize." Forbes, 2014.
Hartnett, Tyson. "Why College Athletes Should Be Paid." Huffington Post, 2014.
Swanson, Ryan. "Want to Clean Up College Athletics? Pay the Players." Washington Post, 2017.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.