How Universities Benefit From College Athletes
This paper examines three primary ways in which universities benefit from college athletes: direct revenue generation through broadcasting rights, ticket sales, and merchandise; institutional branding that enhances a school's prestige and stakeholder loyalty; and increased student enrollment driven by athletic visibility. The paper draws on examples such as the University of Alabama's athletic revenue and the Penn State scandal to illustrate both the scale of institutional gain and the reputational risks universities face. A counter-argument suggesting athletes benefit more than universities is addressed and rebutted. The paper concludes that while athletes may receive scholarships and national exposure, universities profit far more from the relationship while compensating athletes minimally.
- Introduction: Thesis: universities profit while athletes go uncompensated
- Background and History of College Sports: How TV and advertising transformed college athletics
- Direct Revenue: How Colleges Profit: Broadcasting, tickets, and merchandise generate billions
- Branding and Institutional Prestige: Athletic success builds long-term institutional brand value
- Enrollment Growth Through Athletic Success: Winning programs attract more prospective students
- Counter-Argument and Rebuttal: Athletes benefit too, but universities still profit most
- Conclusion: Universities gain far more than the athletes they rely on
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses concrete financial data — such as the University of Alabama's $124 million in athletic revenue — to ground abstract claims about institutional profit in verifiable evidence.
- It anticipates and directly engages a counter-argument, then rebuts it, demonstrating awareness of opposing perspectives and strengthening the overall thesis.
- The consistent structural pattern of stating a benefit, explaining it, and showing how athletes are excluded from that benefit reinforces the central argument across multiple body sections.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates effective use of the claim-evidence-analysis structure. Each body section introduces a specific university benefit (revenue, branding, enrollment), supports it with cited data or examples, and then returns to the thesis — that athletes are excluded from sharing in those benefits. This technique keeps the argument focused and makes each section feel complete rather than digressive.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a classic five-part argumentative essay format: an introduction that previews three main points, a historical background section, three parallel body sections (one per benefit), a counter-argument with rebuttal, and a conclusion. This predictable structure makes the argument easy to follow and mirrors standard academic persuasive essay organization taught at the undergraduate level.
Introduction
College sports is practically an industry unto itself, raking in more than $11 billion in revenues annually — more than many professional sports leagues (Edelman). Universities make a great deal of money off college athletes, who, in return, receive nothing more than an athletic scholarship (sometimes) to attend the university and its classes free of charge. They receive no monetary payment; indeed, paying college athletes is against NCAA rules, which is why the FBI has investigated several high-profile colleges for violating related regulations (Hobson). When coaches break the law, it embarrasses the university, but when athletes win trophies for the college, the university's brand image and value increase exponentially.
College athletes not only enable universities to earn money directly from their performances, but they also help universities develop their brand and attract a broader following. A larger following means greater attendance, and greater attendance feeds into a third major benefit: successful sports programs lead to higher enrollment, which in turn brings more prestige and income to the school. This paper argues that while these three benefits — direct revenue, branding, and enrollment growth — are clearly advantageous for universities, they ultimately come at the expense of the athletes themselves.
Background and History of College Sports
Sports have long been a part of colleges and universities. They bring students, faculty, and community members together to cheer on athletes who are in the prime of their youth and who want to participate in extracurricular activities to develop themselves as well-rounded individuals. Sports were never conceived as the primary reason for attending college; they were ancillary — they enriched the experience and made it fuller. Over time, however, that relationship began to shift.
As the television industry emerged and advertising became a lucrative revenue stream for content providers, college athletics took on an entirely new dimension. Thanks to broadcasting rights — which could be sold for enormous sums — along with advertising, marketing, and merchandise, universities discovered ways to exploit and profit from the hallmark of youthful athletic energy as never before. As the college sports industry grew, universities working arm-in-arm with advertisers and broadcasters developed revenue strategies that would have been unimaginable in earlier eras. Gradually, going to college became less about education and more about sports. Sports brought in significant revenue for schools with winning programs — they just did not pay the athletes who made those programs possible.
Direct Revenue: How Colleges Profit
The first and most direct way in which universities benefit from college athletes is through revenue. College athletes play in nationally televised games that attract large advertising contracts — money that flows into university coffers. For example, "a 2008 analysis conducted by ESPN noted just how profitable programs are to some schools: the University of Alabama athletic department raked in nearly $124 million, thanks in large part to the storied reputation of its Crimson Tide football program" (Emma). That revenue came from multiple streams: "the school saw revenue of more than $13 million from media and branding rights, almost $30 million in donations and $28 million in ticket sales" (Emma).
Universities also sell merchandise — caps, jackets, sweaters, shirts, jerseys, banners, posters, books, magazines, videos, and more — all of it generated by the visibility college athletes create. None of the athletes see a cent in return for the labor that makes this merchandise marketable, even though during the season that labor can amount to more than 40 hours per week (Hartnett). That means college athletes are effectively working full-time — and then some — so that the university can earn millions of dollars. As critics of the NCAA compensation model have long argued, this arrangement raises serious questions about the fairness of amateur athletics.
Conclusion
While one could argue that both athletes and universities benefit from their relationship, the reality is that universities benefit far more. They control the institution, sign the broadcasting rights contracts, collect the advertising revenue, craft their own brand, sell the jerseys and event tickets, and pocket the gains from enrollment increases. College athletes may or may not go on to a professional career after leaving school, but while they are enrolled, they are required to work more hours than a full-time employee in order to remain on the team during the season — and yet for all that labor they receive nothing in monetary return, while universities profit enormously.
The structural imbalance between what universities gain and what athletes receive raises important ethical and policy questions that continue to fuel debate about the future of college athletics in America.
Works Cited
CBS News. "Penn State Scandal." CBS News, 2018.
Edelman, Marc. "21 Reasons Why Student-Athletes are Employees and Should be Allowed to Unionize." Forbes, 2014. https://www.forbes.com/sites/marcedelman/2014/01/30/21-reasons-why-student-athletes-are-employees-and-should-be-allowed-to-unionize/
Emma, Linda. "The Importance of College Athletic Programs to Universities." Seattle PI, 2018. http://education.seattlepi.com/importance-college-athletic-programs-universities-1749.html
Hartnett, Tyson. "Why College Athletes Should be Paid." Huffington Post, 2014.
Hobson, Will. "Defiant and Wounded, Rick Pitino Insists He Did Nothing Wrong — and Wants Back In." Washington Post, 2018. https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/colleges/defiant-and-wounded-rick-pitino-insists-he-did-nothing-wrong--and-wants-back-in/2018/03/21/681d3616-2c6d-11e8-8688-e053ba58f1e4_story.html
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.