Should College Athletes Be Paid? Arguments for Fair Pay
This persuasive essay argues that college athletes should be financially compensated for their participation in sports. Drawing on economic data and scholarly sources, the paper makes three central arguments: college athletes generate enormous revenue for their universities and the NCAA; they face significant physical risk without adequate financial protection; and NCAA regulations effectively prevent them from earning income through other means. The essay also addresses the counterargument that scholarships constitute sufficient compensation, rebutting it by demonstrating that scholarships fail to cover all student-athlete expenses and that revenue is distributed inequitably. The paper concludes with a call for NCAA policy reform.
- Introduction: Thesis: college athletes deserve financial compensation
- Sports Pays — Just Not if You're a College Athlete: NCAA and universities earn billions from athletes
- The Risk of Playing College Sports: Injuries impose physical and financial burdens on athletes
- No Time for Anything Else: NCAA rules block athletes from earning outside income
- Counter-Argument and Rebuttal: Scholarships are insufficient and inequitably distributed
- Conclusion: Call to action for NCAA policy reform
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses concrete revenue figures (e.g., $2.7 billion in football revenue, $933 million from March Madness) to ground abstract fairness arguments in measurable economic reality.
- Directly addresses a counterargument — that scholarships constitute fair compensation — and methodically dismantles it by listing specific unmet expenses and noting that scholarships can be revoked.
- Maintains a consistent persuasive voice throughout, culminating in a clear call to action directed at the reader.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the classic counterargument-and-rebuttal structure: it steelmans the opposing view (scholarships as compensation) before systematically refuting it with multiple sub-points, including scholarship revocability, inequitable revenue distribution, and the financial vulnerability of low-income athletes. This technique signals intellectual honesty and strengthens the overall argument.
Structure breakdown
The essay follows a five-part persuasive structure: an engaging introduction with a clear thesis; three distinct body sections each supporting one sub-claim (revenue, injury risk, lost work opportunities); a dedicated counter-argument and rebuttal section; and a summary-plus-conclusion section that ends with a direct call to action. The outline and pre-write stages are included, reflecting a scaffolded writing process typical of undergraduate composition courses.
Introduction
College sports have long been a source of entertainment and pride for fans across the country. But have you ever wondered whether the athletes at the center of it all are fairly compensated for the enjoyment they bring? Consider the star quarterbacks and standout players who never went on to professional careers but who won fans for life through their athletic achievements in college. Their schools made a great deal from their performances, yet the athletes themselves never saw a dime of that income.
That is why college athletes should be paid for their participation in sports. They bring in significant revenue for their universities, face a high risk of injury, and have limited opportunities to work and earn money outside of their athletic commitments. This paper argues that colleges should compensate their athletes fairly for all the work they do.
Sports Pays — Just Not if You're a College Athlete
When sports took off in America, college athletics turned into a multi-billion dollar industry (Sanderson and Siegfried). In the past, athletes were students who also played a sport. Today, they are practically professionals without pay: they are put through rigorous training to be the best, and the best go on to play at the professional level. That was not always the case. In the past, sports were not the money-maker they are today. But today they drive record profits for schools, and the athletes are the ones who generate that revenue.
College sports, particularly football and basketball, generate significant revenue for universities and the NCAA. According to Forbes, in 2019, the top 25 college football programs generated a total revenue of $2.7 billion, with the University of Texas leading the pack at $223 million in revenue (Smith). Additionally, the top 25 men's basketball programs generated a total revenue of $1.5 billion, with Duke University generating the highest revenue at $34 million (Smith).
Television contracts are a major source of revenue for college sports. Networks such as ESPN, CBS, and Fox pay billions of dollars for the rights to broadcast college football and basketball games (Bassam). For example, ESPN and the SEC (Southeastern Conference) signed a 10-year deal in 2020 worth $3 billion for the rights to broadcast SEC football and basketball games (Caron and Crupi). Sponsorships and merchandise sales are also significant revenue streams for college sports, as universities partner with companies to sponsor their teams and events, and fans purchase jerseys, hats, and other merchandise.
The NCAA, the governing body of college sports, also generates enormous revenue from March Madness, the annual men's basketball tournament. In 2019, March Madness generated $933 million in revenue, with $827 million coming from television and marketing rights alone (Caron and Crupi). While it is important to note that not all college sports programs are profitable — in fact, only a small percentage of universities generate significant revenue from their athletic programs — the financial benefits for those that do are quite substantial. If an athlete is playing at a top-tier school, a great deal is expected from that athlete, and a great deal is generated in return.
The Risk of Playing College Sports
There is also considerable risk that college athletes accept as a result of playing sports at a high level. Sports injuries can have a significant impact on the lives of athletes, both during and after their playing careers. Injuries sustained while playing college sports can be particularly devastating, as they can prevent athletes from continuing to play and can have long-lasting physical and emotional effects. Such injuries range from minor sprains and strains to more serious conditions such as broken bones, torn ligaments, and concussions — all of which can require extensive medical treatment, rehabilitation, and time away from sport. In some cases, injuries can lead to permanent disability.
For college athletes, injuries can also significantly affect their academic and professional goals. Many have dreams of playing professionally, but injuries can prevent them from achieving those goals. Even if an athlete is able to recover and continue playing, an injury can affect performance and limit potential.
Given the high risk of injury that college athletes face, it stands to reason that they deserve compensation for putting their health on the line. The universities and the NCAA make billions of dollars from their performances, yet these athletes receive nothing beyond, at best, a scholarship. Some argue that athletes should receive a portion of the revenue generated by their sports programs as compensation for the risks they take on the field or court. In addition to the physical and emotional toll, sports injuries can also carry significant financial implications. Medical bills, rehabilitation costs, and time away from sport can all accumulate, leaving athletes and their families with serious financial burdens. Compensation for college athletes could help to alleviate some of these financial stresses and provide a safety net for those who are injured.
Conclusion
It is time for the NCAA to reconsider its rules and allow college athletes to benefit financially from their athletic abilities. College athletes bring in significant revenue for their universities, face a high risk of injury, and have limited opportunities to work and earn money outside of their athletic commitments. Prohibiting them from accepting payment for their sports performance is unfair and unjust.
College athletes spend enormous amounts of time preparing for competition. The universities they represent rely on them for income — they are, in effect, employees of their schools, generating revenue through televised games, ticket sales, merchandise, and sponsorships. March Madness alone generates nearly a billion dollars annually. Yet the athletes upon whom it all depends receive none of that revenue directly. They may receive a scholarship — but NCAA regulations prevent them from generating any income for themselves. That is a serious problem, because these same athletes have no time to pursue internships, co-ops, or the kind of networking that other students use to build their careers. So even if they hold a scholarship — and not all of them do — they are not truly able to support themselves, even while doing so much to support their school.
The solution is to treat being a college athlete like any other competitive position: players should receive a share of the revenue their performance generates, or some comparable arrangement should be established. This would help distribute wealth more equitably and signal that schools are no longer taking advantage of student athletes.
I call upon you to urge the NCAA to revise its policies and allow college athletes to be compensated for their hard work and dedication. This change will not only benefit the athletes themselves but also help create a more equitable and fair system. We must recognize the value and contribution of college athletes and give them the opportunity to benefit financially from their talent — just like any other student who is free to earn money through part-time work or other means. In conclusion, college athletes should be paid, and it is time for the NCAA to make the necessary changes to ensure that they are treated fairly and justly.
Works Cited
Bassam, Tom. "The NFL's New Broadcast Rights Deal." Sportspromedia.com. Accessed April 20, 2023.
Caron, Emily, and Anthony Crupi. "ESPN Signs $3 Billion Deal for SEC Football as CBS Era Nears End." Yahoo Sports. Accessed April 20, 2023.
Sanderson, Allen R., and John J. Siegfried. "The Case for Paying College Athletes." Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 29, no. 1, 2015, pp. 115–138.
Smith, Chris. "College Football's Most Valuable Teams." Forbes.com. Accessed April 20, 2023.
Sobocinski, Eric J. "College Athletes: What Is Fair Compensation." Marquette Sports Law Journal, vol. 7, 1996, p. 257.
Zema, Phillip. "Should Student-Athletes Be Paid?" Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, vol. 13, no. 2, 2019, pp. 198–212.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.