Combating Prejudice: Behavioral Strategies in Healthcare
This paper reviews six quantitative studies that examine behavioral and social-cognitive strategies for reducing prejudice in general and clinical settings. Drawing on research by McGregor, Dovidio and Gaertner, Levy, Burgess and colleagues, Lock, and Crisp and Turner, the paper explores techniques ranging from role-playing and anti-racist instruction to imagined intergroup contact. Special attention is given to the healthcare context, where unconscious bias can compromise patient care. The review argues that both traditional educational approaches and innovative cognitive interventions — such as perspective-taking, imagery, and mental simulation — are effective tools for fostering empathy, reducing stereotyping, and improving cross-cultural rapport among clinicians and the general public.
- Introduction: Prejudice and the Need for Effective Interventions: Framing prejudice as a social and clinical problem
- Role-Playing and Anti-Racist Teaching: McGregor's Meta-Analysis: Meta-analysis finding behavioral tactics reduce racist attitudes
- Intergroup Bias and Cognitive Techniques: Dovidio and Gaertner: Intergroup contact strategies targeting subtle, unconscious prejudice
- Social-Cognitive Factors and Early Intervention: Levy: Early childhood classification training to interrupt stereotyping
- Reducing Bias in Healthcare: Burgess and Lock: Empathy and perspective-taking skills for clinical providers
- Imagined Interactions and Positive Perceptions: Crisp and Turner: Mental simulation of intergroup contact improves out-group attitudes
- Conclusion: Integrating Strategies to Combat Racist Thought and Behavior: Synthesis of traditional and innovative prejudice-reduction approaches
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper synthesizes six distinct empirical studies cohesively, drawing connections across them rather than simply summarizing each in isolation.
- It moves logically from general prejudice-reduction strategies to the specific clinical context of healthcare, giving the review a clear applied focus.
- The inclusion of concrete examples — such as the bystander effect experiment and the kindergarten classification study — grounds abstract behavioral concepts in accessible, memorable illustrations.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective literature synthesis: each study is introduced with its central research question, its methodology is briefly noted, and its key findings are connected to the overarching argument that multiple behavioral approaches can successfully reduce prejudice. Transitional phrases like "similarly," "on the other hand," and "in a similar fashion" signal how each source relates to the others, modeling clear argumentative flow across multiple sources.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief framing of prejudice as a social and professional concern, then devotes a focused section to each of the six studies reviewed. It closes with a short integrative conclusion that synthesizes the common finding — that both traditional instructional methods and innovative cognitive strategies effectively reduce bias. The structure is essentially a thematic literature review organized study by study, culminating in a unifying takeaway.
Introduction: Prejudice and the Need for Effective Interventions
Developing and maintaining smooth race relations is something important to society and something crucial in the professional healthcare arena. Having a strong rapport and understanding with people from all walks of life is essential both as a professional healthcare provider and as a citizen. While some racist attitudes are overt, others are more concealed. Regardless of their form, all require an effective approach to combat these destructive tendencies.
Role-Playing and Anti-Racist Teaching: McGregor's Meta-Analysis
The study "Effectiveness of Role-Playing and Anti-Racist Teaching in Reducing Student Prejudice" by McGregor attempted to examine the impact of behavioral instruction — through acting out scenarios and formal lessons — on tolerance and the damage caused by bias. According to McGregor, meta-analysis was the key strategy used to synthesize findings from a range of research studies. Studies were identified according to a host of predetermined criteria, summarized, and the results were then converted into a standardized score called an "effect size" (1993). Quantitatively, 26 studies were used, offering 43 effect sizes: "Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to interpret the effect-size data. Through multiple-regression techniques, 65% of the variance was explained, and several moderating variables were found to influence the strategies' effectiveness" (McGregor, 1993). Essentially, McGregor found that all of these behavioral tactics were successful in minimizing racist attitudes and actions, with their effectiveness being generally very similar (McGregor, 1993).
Intergroup Bias and Cognitive Techniques: Dovidio and Gaertner
Similarly, the study "Reducing Prejudice: Combating Intergroup Biases" by Dovidio and Gaertner acknowledges the benefit of traditional teaching and instructional methods for reducing overt and more traditional forms of prejudice, generally when they occur in overt individual or collective manners (1999). However, the authors also astutely recognize another form of prejudice — one that occurs in a more subtle, less conscious manner in contemporary society. This is a trickier form of prejudice to address and it requires different behavioral techniques than those used for standard forms of bias.
"Individual-oriented techniques can involve leading people who possess contemporary prejudices to discover inconsistencies among their self-images, values, and behaviors; such inconsistencies can arouse negative emotional states (e.g., guilt), which motivate the development of more favorable attitudes" (Dovidio & Gaertner, 1999). Dovidio and Gaertner explore the benefit of engaging in intergroup contact techniques to restructure contact and thereby create more individualized perceptions of members of other groups, increase more intimate and meaningful interactions between group members, and rework boundaries to develop "more inclusive, superordinate representations of the groups" (1999).
Dovidio and Gaertner stress the necessity of understanding where prejudice comes from so that interventions can be best designed to address it effectively (1999). They engaged in a range of experiments and found that certain behavioral techniques to combat this subtle form of prejudice were more effective than others. For example, techniques that sought to engage the authentic motivations of people to be non-prejudiced proved particularly useful (Dovidio & Gaertner, 1999). They found that when forging intergroup dynamics between people, focusing on realistic group conflict and the psychological impacts of classifying people into in-groups and out-groups were all effective methods for demonstrating how damaging and problematic prejudice can be (1999). Dovidio and Gaertner also discovered the benefits of prompting people, via intergroup contact, to form better collective representations of groups — thereby taking advantage of psychological forces to improve attitudes toward people they might otherwise dismiss (1999). All in all, the study presents a range of truly beneficial findings for targeting a far more subversive and hidden form of prejudice.
Conclusion: Integrating Strategies to Combat Racist Thought and Behavior
These quantitative studies demonstrate the importance of using both traditional and non-traditional educational approaches in combating racist thoughts and actions. Many of the techniques work foremost to address racist thinking, as thoughts often inform behavior. Some of the strategies reviewed are standard instructional methods designed to develop knowledge, awareness, and empathy toward other racial groups; others — such as imagined intergroup contact — are more innovative. All, however, demonstrated a high level of effectiveness in reducing prejudice across a variety of contexts.
References
Burgess, D., van Ryn, M., Dovidio, J., & Saha, S. (2007). Reducing racial bias among health care providers: Lessons from social-cognitive psychology. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 882–887.
Crisp, R., & Turner, R. (2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? American Psychologist, 231–240.
Dovidio, J., & Gaertner, S. (1999). Reducing prejudice: Combating intergroup bias. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 101–110.
Levy, S. (1999). Reducing prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 745–765.
Lock, J. (1998). Strategies for reducing homophobia during medical training. Journal of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association, 167–174.
McGregor, J. (1993). Effectiveness of role playing and antiracist teaching in reducing student prejudice. The Journal of Educational Research, 215–226.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.