This paper examines the growing importance of communication skills for information technology (IT) and information systems (IS) professionals. Drawing on research from Becker, Insley, and Endres (1997), Schulman (1975), and other scholars, it explores how decentralization of IS functions, the shift from hardware to software, and the rise of teamwork have made listening, writing, presenting, and interpersonal skills essential competencies. The paper also reviews survey data on perceived skill importance across job types, critiques traditional business school curricula for neglecting communication development, and outlines a proposed research timeline for further investigation. Data from Likert-scale surveys illustrate that most IS employees spend the majority of their working time engaged in some form of communication.
Finneran (1994), as cited by Becker, Insley, and Endres (1997), stated that communication has become a necessity even for the most technically oriented personnel. As an example, he mentioned employees who provide user support and who require non-verbal and interpersonal skills in order to tailor their speech to the client's level of knowledge and understanding. The same author stressed the importance of presentation skills, which have become compulsory for technical employees.
Leitheiser's survey (1992) investigated managers' perceptions of technical, interpersonal, programming, and business skills. His research concluded that listening and writing were the most important competencies, and presentation skills also appeared near the top of the hierarchy (Becker, Insley, & Endres, 1997).
Other specialists have argued that communication has become critical for IT employees because of the decentralization of the information systems (IS) function. As a result, the centralized authority coordinating IS functions has disappeared, and IT employees have become responsible for interacting effectively with colleagues across different departments (Becker, Insley, & Endres, 1997).
As Crockett and Pastore (1993) suggest, interpersonal skills have become essential as IS employees have evolved into "effective team players." This trend is clearly illustrated by Edward Schulman (1975), who, referring to the Integrated Semester course he teaches, emphasizes the importance of a socialization week during which students get to know one another and overcome ego and inhibition.
Organizations have recognized the value of synergy as well. To help ensure the success of a project, managers send the employees involved in its completion on activities such as a canoe weekend trip or a retreat to a remote mountain cabin. The rationale behind such initiatives is that by exposing all employees to the same challenging situation, the cohesive force that emerges among them will carry over into the framework of the project they must complete together (Becker, Insley, & Endres, 1997).
Researchers have also identified teaching methods that inadvertently encourage interpersonal hostility. In 1989, Simon observed that business schools did a commendable job of conveying technical information but fell short in developing students' communication skills — a finding that underscores the gap between technical training and professional readiness.
Edward Schulman (1975) presents a compelling argument for the increased importance of communication skills in the IS field. He emphasizes that contemporary corporations have shifted their focus from hardware to software, the latter now representing the major expenditure of an IT firm. This shift has generated greater concern with program quality and programmer productivity — two goals that managers pursue by recruiting experienced professionals and training recent graduates.
Neither approach, however, has proved sufficiently effective, because managers have tended to overlook the human dimension of programming activity. Recruitment practices often rely on quantitative questions (e.g., "How many projects have you developed?") rather than qualitative ones (e.g., "Were those projects successful?"), leaving the social and interpersonal aspects of the work unexamined. As the Human Sciences and Technology Group (HST) has pointed out, the highest potential can be realized only by "studying and capitalizing on this human element and not trying to eliminate a certainty."
"Likert-scale survey results across IS job categories"
"Business school failures and recommended communication courses"
"Step-by-step proposed research schedule and methods"
You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.