This paper examines the Comprehensive Conflict Coaching (CCC) Model as outlined by Jones and Brinkert, detailing its preliminary phases and four core stages: discovering the story, exploring it from multiple perspectives, crafting the best story, and enacting it. The paper then applies these stages to a real-world workplace conflict involving employee resistance to a new booking system. By drawing on assessment, evaluation, and trust-building strategies aligned with the CCC framework, the author demonstrates how conflict coaching principles can guide individuals through resistance and toward productive change. The analysis highlights how personal narrative, perspective-taking, and strategic empathy facilitate conflict resolution.
The Comprehensive Conflict Coaching (CCC) Model is exactly what its name suggests: a targeted and comprehensive approach to managing conflict situations between individuals. Before the actual model is applied, several preliminary phases should determine whether the model is adequate for a given situation and prepare the parties for the coaching effort. One of these important preliminary phases is the initial conversation, during which the participant should come to understand what the model implies, how it can help in a particular situation, and how progress can be made.
Another preliminary phase involves the assessment of both the coach and the client. This is again aimed at determining whether the model is applicable to a certain situation. This phase examines potential conflicts of interest and whether the client is suited for a coaching session, including whether he or she is open and willing to communicate with the coach.
There are four stages in the Comprehensive Conflict Coaching Model: discovering the story; exploring the story from three perspectives; crafting the best story; and enacting the best story. The following sections analyze the most important characteristics of each stage.
Stage one, discovering the story, involves several subcomponents. Clients tell the story from their own perspective, giving listeners the ability to understand how they feel about the matter and to evaluate whether their attitudes are well-founded. The second stage requires the coach to emphasize the objective side of the story and help clients understand what they need to change about their thinking in order to see things from a broader point of view. After considering all sides of the story, stage three has the client acknowledge that he or she needs to shift their thinking — at least enough to help resolve the conflict. Stage four has the client implement the best strategy available in order to achieve a productive outcome.
"Applying conflict coaching to a real booking system dispute"
"Linking personal experience to CCC theory and citations"
You’re 37% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.