This paper examines the ethical principles governing doctor-patient confidentiality in healthcare, with particular focus on the American Medical Association's guidelines for computerized medical databases. Drawing primarily from AMA ethics opinions E-5.07, E-5.059, E-7.02, and E-10.01, the paper outlines key requirements for maintaining patient privacy, including record-keeping protocols, informed consent for database access, data encryption, access controls, purging procedures, and restrictions on third-party data disclosure. The paper argues that physician-patient confidentiality is a foundational patient right that demands the highest standards of ethical and procedural compliance.
This paper demonstrates effective use of primary source synthesis — rather than relying on secondary commentary, the student draws directly from official AMA ethics opinions and explains each provision in their own words. This technique establishes credibility and shows the reader exactly where each claim originates.
The paper opens with a brief introduction establishing the importance of doctor-patient confidentiality and identifying the governing AMA documents. The body systematically addresses each major AMA guideline relating to computerized records — covering record-stamping, informed consent, purging, online access restrictions, record destruction, encryption, and third-party release limits. A short conclusion reinforces the ethical weight of the subject. The reference list cites four specific AMA ethics opinion URLs.
One of the most important elements of medical care is the ethical non-disclosure agreement between doctor and patient. This agreement is in place to ensure that patients have the freedom to be absolutely honest with their physicians. Frequently, the lives of patients depend upon the assurance of confidentiality, which ensures that patients will release all the information necessary to be treated in a targeted and effective way. The American Medical Association has provided very clear guidelines for doctor-patient confidentiality and its maintenance, particularly as relevant to computer databases. General guidelines for the relationship between physicians and their patients, along with the maintenance of confidentiality, are addressed by the E-5.059, E-7.02, and E-10.01 forms on the AMA online database.
The E-5.07 form of the AMA medical ethics guide, which deals with computer confidentiality, states that it is important to date- and time-stamp any changes to confidential medical information on the computer-based patient record. This naturally includes corrections to such records. Furthermore, the record should also show who made the changes, and such changes should only be made by authorized personnel. This serves the important purpose of keeping the patient informed of relevant changes and corrections to his or her medical information.
Both the patient and the physician responsible for treatment should be advised of the existence of computerized databases prior to their creation and storage by computer personnel. Furthermore, the patient should also be informed of all the persons and entities with any access to this information via the database. The specific level of access, along with the names of the persons or entities, should be disclosed to the patient before any database-related information is released. The reason for this measure is to obtain the informed consent of the patient for the disclosure of his or her confidential information to the parties involved, according to the AMA ethical standard.
Both the patient and physician should be notified of purging procedures before and after purging takes place. An important aspect of this is that the patient's records should not be mixed with those of other computer service bureau clients, regardless of whether the information is considered archaic or incorrect. Measures to protect the records being purged should be implemented throughout the process.
To provide optimal protection of privacy, the computerized medical database should be online to the terminal only when computer programs with the necessary authorization — and specifically requiring the data — are in use. No person or entity outside of the clinical facility should have access to any online computerized database containing medical records of patients who can be identified via the program. This ensures continued doctor-patient confidentiality, which belongs to the patient according to standard medical ethics as well as the law.
The computer service bureau should provide the physician with verification of destroyed or erased records. The physician is primarily charged with the confidentiality of patient records and should therefore always be fully aware of any action taken regarding those records. Correspondingly, the patient should also be kept informed of such actions, as they directly affect his or her confidentiality status. The physician should then advise the patient regarding the necessary steps or allowances required for the destruction of the records.
As noted above, it is absolutely vital to identify all individuals and organizations with access to the databases containing a patient's medical records. This is again required for the purpose of informed consent. The physician should likewise be informed of such individuals or organizations. The patient is then given full power to provide or withhold consent, in consultation with advice from the physician.
The AMA ethics opinion recommends encryption, along with several other measures, to ensure the security of medical records from unauthorized access. Other forms of access control include passwords and scannable badges. These measures ensure the confidentiality of patient records and protect them from outside parties, including hackers or other entities acting without the informed consent of both the physician and the patient.
Physician-patient confidentiality is one of the nearly sacred rights that a patient may rely upon. AMA guidelines in this regard should therefore never be disregarded or treated with anything less than the utmost seriousness.
You’re 71% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.