This paper examines the evolving concept of professionalism in contemporary policing in the United States. Drawing on Stone and Travis's framework, the paper identifies four key principles of the "new professionalism" — accountability, legitimacy, innovation, and national coherence — and contrasts today's highly formalized police culture with earlier, locally driven police forces that were often marked by corruption and inconsistency. The paper traces two major police reform movements of the twentieth century and analyzes how increased public scrutiny, technological documentation, and rule-bound protocols have reshaped the role of the front-line officer. It concludes by noting both the protective value and the constraints that formalization places on individual officers and police forces as a whole.
The paper demonstrates effective use of a framing quotation — a substantive, multi-sentence passage from a scholarly source that introduces a conceptual framework (the four principles) and then structures the rest of the analysis. This technique signals to readers that the argument is grounded in existing scholarship rather than personal opinion.
The paper follows a straightforward progression: it opens by defining modern professionalism, introduces the four-principle framework via direct quotation, discusses how public documentation has raised accountability demands, provides historical contrast with earlier police reform movements, and concludes by analyzing how formalization shapes the contemporary officer's role and the stakes of professional conduct. The argument flows logically from definition to history to consequence.
Professionalism is the cornerstone of modern policing strategies and is being taught as a core value and management principle by organizations such as the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD). However, the concept of professionalism and the skills required to uphold a professional image have grown considerably more comprehensive over the years. There are many competing ideas about what professionalism at different organizational levels actually embodies. One influential definition centers on the concepts of accountability and effectiveness.
Stone and Travis (2011) articulate a compelling vision of where American policing is headed:
"Across the United States, police organizations are striving for a new professionalism. Their leaders are committing themselves to stricter accountability for both their effectiveness and their conduct while they seek to increase their legitimacy in the eyes of those they police and to encourage continuous innovation in police practices. The traffic in these ideas, policies, and practices is now so vigorous across the nation that it suggests a fourth element of this new professionalism: its national coherence. These four principles — accountability, legitimacy, innovation, and coherence — are not new in themselves, but together they provide an account of developments in policing during the last 20 years that distinguishes the policing of the present era from that of 30, 50, or 100 years ago." (Stone & Travis, 2011)
Previous generations of police forces were not held to the same standards as today. Furthermore, the actions of the police are now commonly filmed, documented, and shared by the public, which creates a situation in which greater accountability is essential to maintaining the trust and cooperation of the communities officers serve.
Previous generations of law enforcement did not face the same limitations, and there were arguably two significant police reform movements that took place during the twentieth century (Fogelson, 1979). Police departments during these periods were committed to local influences rather than any national agenda. The goals of a given police department were generally set by the local community's political representatives and could vary considerably from location to location. Some police forces were known for corruption and misconduct, while also engaging in discriminatory behavior toward racial minorities and immigrants. Police departments had relatively little accountability infrastructure, and many individual officers exercised a considerable amount of personal discretion. In this sense, officers could be considered the frontline of the entire criminal justice system, as they held authority to enforce punishments and render on-the-spot judgments.
The evolution of policing in the United States reflects a sustained effort to align law enforcement with principles of accountability, legitimacy, innovation, and national coherence. As Stone and Travis (2011) argue, these principles together define a new era of professionalism that distinguishes contemporary policing from earlier models. While the formalization of police roles does limit individual officer discretion, it ultimately provides a structural safeguard that supports both institutional integrity and community trust — two foundations upon which effective modern policing depends.
Fogelson, R. (1979). Big-City Police. Political Science Quarterly, 701–703.
Glennetal. (n.d.). The Luster in the Badge.
Stone, C., & Travis, J. (2011). Toward a new professionalism in policing. In New Perspectives in Policing.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.