This paper examines a local continuing education agency's program development plan designed to help unemployed and underemployed workers re-enter the workforce. The agency uses a filter-and-rating approach to define learning objectives, engage large local employers, and secure government funding. The paper evaluates the strengths of this approach — including its use of established planning models, employer partnerships, and audience awareness — as well as its weaknesses, such as the risk of curriculum obsolescence and dependency on external funding sources. The analysis provides a concise critique of the program's overall viability and sustainability.
This paper demonstrates applied program evaluation, a standard technique in education and workforce development literature. The writer moves from descriptive summary (what the agency plans to do) to normative critique (what could go wrong and why), modeling the kind of structured analysis expected in continuing education and adult learning coursework.
The paper is organized into two functional movements: the first paragraph describes the agency's planning methodology and goals, while the second paragraph delivers a strengths-and-weaknesses evaluation. This compact structure suits a focused analytical response, though a fuller treatment would separate strengths and weaknesses into distinct sections and expand each with supporting evidence or literature.
The agency described here is a local continuing education program developing a new learning plan for unemployed workers hoping to hone their skills and return to the workforce. Their approach to developing this plan includes defining the student population (unemployed and underemployed workers), clarifying their learning objectives (to gain employment in a better-paying job), and applying a filter approach combined with a rating approach to decide the objectives and programming necessary for the plan.
The agency intends to work with some of the largest employers in the area to develop training objectives that will put workers back to work and equip them with the skills those employers require. Employers will be ranked by their needs, and continuing education programs will be developed to meet those needs accordingly. The agency also plans to collaborate with government agencies that provide funding for re-educating unemployed workers in order to help finance the program.
The strengths of this program development plan are readily apparent. The agency is developing programming that is highly viable in a challenging economy, and the plan includes at least some government or social agency involvement, along with the meaningful participation of large local organizations. The program draws on sound planning models to design and create its offerings, and the planners demonstrate clear awareness of the program's intended audience, purpose, and subject matter. This combination of workforce development focus, institutional partnerships, and structured planning methodology gives the program a strong foundation for launch and community impact.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.