This paper reviews Naugle's (2009) article on the ethical and legal dimensions of psychological testing in counseling practice. It examines key issues including counselor credentials, test design bias, appropriate use of results, and the regulatory frameworks governing who may administer assessments. The review also addresses the tension between protecting clients from potential test misuse and preserving counselors' professional capacity to deliver essential services. Particular attention is given to the risk that overly restrictive testing regulations may harm vulnerable populations who depend on school and public-institution counselors for access to mental health assessment and treatment planning.
According to Naugle (2009), assessment carries both an ethical component and a legal dimension that all counselors must understand. Testing has long been considered integral to the counselor's role, as assessment measures are used to determine prognosis and to inform treatment plans and interventions. Theoretically, testing creates a standardized method of assessment. There has, however, been an increasing push toward more "authentic" forms of assessment beyond standardized tests. The authenticity of testing can be improved by not relying solely on quantitative designs but also by incorporating qualitative measures such as portfolios.
One of the primary ethical issues associated with testing concerns the credentials of the person administering the test. A related concern involves the credentials of the person evaluating the results. There are also ethical questions regarding which individuals or organizations designed the test or assessment tool. It is important to recognize biases or political undertones in the design and implementation of testing. Additional ethical issues arise from how test results are used. For example, an intelligence test can be used to place a student in a remedial class, which could have a detrimental impact on that student's growth and development.
To address the ethical issue of test delivery competence, the Psychological Corporation offers a grading system in which tests are evaluated according to the level of professional credentials required for their administration. Some tests require a professional background and credentials to administer, while others can be purchased by any consumer. Other organizations maintain far stricter guidelines and permit their tests to be sold only to qualified professionals. Some states have established their own guidelines for psychological testing administration. Despite the variation among private organizations, the core objective remains consistent: to ensure the ethical administration and implementation of psychological testing.
"Test bans, professional harm, and discrimination concerns"
"Call for balanced policy protecting counselors and clients"
You’re 49% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.