Counselor Verbal Behavior and Client Rapport: A Study Review
This paper reviews Sharpley et al.'s (2000) study, "The Use of Counselor Verbal Response Modes and Client-Perceived Rapport," which examined therapist behaviors during counseling sessions to determine which actions most effectively build client rapport. Unlike most behavioral research, which focuses on the client, this study turned its lens on the counselor. Using the Standardized Client Method and MANOVA statistical analysis across 59 counseling-in-training sessions, researchers measured minute-by-minute rapport ratings. The paper summarizes the study's methods, stated claims, and actual findings, noting both the value of controlled data collection and the limitations introduced by using trained client replicas rather than real clients.
- Introduction: Study focuses on counselor rather than client behavior
- The Working Alliance Model: Framework of bonds, goals, and tasks in counseling
- Research Methodology: Standardized client method and MANOVA analysis explained
- What the Study Claimed to Show: Claims about rapport-building strategies from data
- What the Research Actually Showed: Verbal engagement correlated with stronger session rapport
- Conclusion and Limitations: Validity concerns from using trained client replicas
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly distinguishes between what the study claimed to show and what the data actually showed, demonstrating critical reading of research rather than simple summary.
- It contextualizes the study within a broader gap in the literature — the relative absence of empirical research on therapist behavior compared to client behavior — giving the review a clear purpose.
- The paper accurately identifies both methodological strengths (the standardized client method, minute-by-minute electronic data capture) and a key validity concern (the use of trained replicas rather than real clients).
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates critical article analysis — a core undergraduate skill in psychology and counseling courses. Rather than simply restating the study's conclusions, the writer evaluates the methodology, separates claims from evidence, and raises a legitimate threat to external validity. This approach models the kind of structured, evaluative thinking expected in research methods coursework.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a contextualizing introduction that identifies the study's unique focus on counselor rather than client behavior. It then explains the theoretical framework (the Working Alliance model), describes the study's methodology in detail, and addresses the study's stated versus actual findings in separate sections. The paper closes by noting limitations in the method's real-world generalizability. This question-driven structure — method, claims, findings — reflects a standard research critique format used in undergraduate counseling and psychology programs.
Introduction
The bulk of most behavioral research rests in exploring and measuring the behaviors of the client, or patient, and not that of the therapist involved in the context of therapeutic behavioral counseling itself. Yet, this is the prime focus of a 2000 research study conducted by Sharpley et al., entitled "The Use of Counselor Verbal Response Modes and Client-Perceived Rapport." This study focused its research on examining and assessing the behaviors of therapists mid-session in order to help determine which behaviors are most effective for building client rapport.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.