This paper examines crisis management strategies for two specific emergency scenarios: bomb threats and robberies in progress. It outlines the importance of situational information gathering, evacuation protocols, and communication chains when responding to bomb threats, including guidance on phone call management and coordination with first responders. The paper then applies a seven-stage crisis cycle framework to armed robbery response, emphasizing situational awareness, stress management, and the roles of contact and cover officers. Throughout, the paper stresses that effective crisis management depends on pre-established procedural guidelines, organizational culture, and clearly defined chains of command.
The paper consistently pairs a claim with a cited source before drawing a practical implication — a strong example of evidence-based argumentation. For instance, the observation that officers unnecessarily kill suspects during robberies is sourced to Miller (2006) and immediately used to justify the need for stress management culture, showing how academic evidence can drive policy-relevant conclusions.
The paper is organized into two parallel crisis scenarios, each followed by a contingencies subsection. This mirrored structure allows the reader to compare approaches across different threat types while reinforcing shared principles such as pre-established protocols and inter-agency communication. The conclusion of each scenario section circles back to the overarching theme of preparedness and information sharing, giving the paper coherent internal logic despite its compact length.
The most important step in crisis management is gathering situational information. Decisions and responses should be based on the information at hand, evaluated on a situation-by-situation basis. Effective crisis management requires pre-established protocols, clearly defined chains of command, and strong relationships between organizations and first responders. Whether facing a bomb threat or a robbery in progress, the underlying principle is the same: preparation and information sharing determine the quality of the response.
If a bomb threat occurs in a school, it must be taken seriously. However, "many school bomb threats have been made by students seeking to disrupt the school day and to get out of school" (National School Safety and Security Services, 2013). Therefore, evacuations are not necessarily warranted or desirable in every case.
An immediate visual search of the area is warranted to determine whether the threat should be taken seriously. Ideally, personnel familiar with the building will perform the visual scan, since they will recognize suspicious objects more readily. If a suspicious object is detected, an evacuation becomes advisable. Effective crisis management demands a smooth evacuation procedure, with pre-designed protocols that all employees are familiar with for maximum efficiency and minimum panic.
It is important to have protocols and procedures in place with clear chains of command. One measure specific to bomb threats is phone call management. If the threat is phoned in, the receiver of the call is instructed to remain on the line as long as possible without hanging up, in order to preserve the potential for tracing the call (Department of Homeland Security, 2013). Remaining on the line with the caller may also elicit valuable information that can help identify the location of any explosives as well as the perpetrator.
Bomb threats do not end with the initial phone call and evacuation. First responders place themselves at considerable risk, given that "some bombers, terrorists, and related offenders who plant bombs also place secondary explosive devices to harm first responders and others after an initial bomb is located and/or exploded" (National School Safety and Security Services, 2013). For this reason, first responders should be thoroughly debriefed. Effective crisis management depends on maintaining strong relationships with first responders and ensuring that channels of communication and information sharing remain open.
According to Miller (2006), many law enforcement officers unnecessarily kill suspects in the line of duty during robberies in progress, making effective crisis management critical in these situations. Crisis management begins with stress management (Miller, 2006). Creating an organizational culture that recognizes the need for stress management is a first step toward preventing such problems. Moreover, because robberies are common problems to which law enforcement responds, having a specific set of protocols in place provides effective crisis management tools.
According to the Wisconsin Department of Justice (2007), the seven stages of the crisis cycle are as follows. First, the normal state of affairs is disrupted. Second, the incident or stimulation occurs. Third, there is an escalation of tension in the situation. Fourth, this escalation leads to the state of crisis — the critical stage. Fifth is de-escalation, followed by stabilization and a return to normalcy as the sixth stage. Finally, there is a post-crisis drain. At all stages, the law enforcement officer must remain in control. Being in control dissipates crisis and tension, and minimizes the potential for escalation or error. The preservation of life remains a priority throughout the crisis management process.
Being in control entails knowing how and when to respond. Situational awareness is the key. The officer must observe all available data and remain aware of all dangers, calling for backup if needed. Early warning signs include a subject "conspicuously ignoring" law enforcement or, conversely, "moving in an exaggerated way" or "giving excessive emotional attention" (Wisconsin Department of Justice, 2007, p. 10). When an officer is fully aware of these and other warning signs, he or she is less likely to misinterpret a suspect's behavior or react at the wrong moment — or worse, too late. While being in control is central to crisis management during a robbery in progress, the officer must never become complacent or let his or her guard down until the crisis has completely dissipated and the suspect is under arrest.
You’re 76% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.