C. S. Lewis's Reflections on the Psalms: A Critical Review
This paper offers a critical review of C. S. Lewis's Reflections on the Psalms (1958), a twelve-chapter work aimed at helping general readers appreciate the Book of Psalms as poetry rather than doctrine. The review summarizes the book's two major sections — one examining Psalms from Jewish and general reader perspectives, the other from a Christian standpoint — before evaluating Lewis's central arguments. The paper identifies key strengths, including Lewis's admiration for the Psalms' poetic beauty, alongside notable weaknesses such as the book's unconventional ordering of topics, underdeveloped premises, and insufficient engagement with biblical symbolism. The review concludes that, despite its limitations, the book is best suited to mature Christians rather than the amateurs Lewis originally targeted.
- Overview of Reflections on the Psalms: Lewis's central argument and purpose introduced
- Structure and Content of the Book: Two-part structure and key themes summarized
- Strengths of Lewis's Approach: Lewis's admiration and poetic perspective praised
- Weaknesses and Critical Gaps: Topical ordering, weak premises, and missing symbolism critiqued
- Lewis's Intended Audience and Purpose: Amateur audience aim versus scholarly expectations examined
- Overall Assessment and Recommendation: Book recommended for mature Christians despite limitations
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The review maintains a balanced evaluative tone, acknowledging both strengths and weaknesses without becoming purely polemical or uncritically admiring.
- It grounds criticism in specific textual evidence, citing Lewis's own words and chapter references to support each evaluative claim.
- The paper moves logically from summary to critique, giving readers enough context before presenting judgments — a sound structure for a book review.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of textual critique: it quotes Lewis directly, identifies the internal contradictions in his reasoning (such as the tension between writing for amateurs yet presenting arguments that require scholarly grounding), and uses a biblical counterexample — the story of Jacob and Esau — to expose the weakness in Lewis's handling of symbolism. This technique of testing an author's claims against their own stated aims is a hallmark of rigorous literary and theological review.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a summary of Lewis's overarching argument and the book's two-part structure. It then moves to strengths before pivoting to a sustained critique covering topical ordering, argumentative foundation, and symbolism. A paragraph on Lewis's stated audience purpose follows, and the paper closes with an overall verdict and reading recommendation. The structure follows the classic summary–evaluate–recommend pattern expected in undergraduate book reviews.
Overview of Reflections on the Psalms
In his book Reflections on the Psalms, C. S. Lewis examines the Book of Psalms — one of the most widely read books in the Bible. He focuses on how the book portrays the Bible, God, and faith, exploring Psalms' poetic verses and their relevance to the reader's everyday life. The book has twelve chapters, purposely written to provide general readers with a better understanding of the Book of Psalms. Lewis's overarching argument is that the Book of Psalms was originally written as a poetic work (Lewis, Reflections on the Psalms, 2). Accordingly, it should be read in a lyrical fashion, as opposed to a doctrinal or sermonized one. The Psalms should be sung as hymns to worship God and read as poems in order to grasp the original message their authors intended to convey. For Lewis, the intention of his book is not to justify the truthfulness of Christianity; it is rather to help the reader of Psalms understand the true meaning of the text (Lewis, Reflections on the Psalms, 7). This paper provides a critique of the book.
Structure and Content of the Book
The book is divided into two major sections. In the first section (chapters 1–9), Lewis examines the Book of Psalms from the perspectives of readers and Jewish writers. This section focuses specifically on topics relating to judgment, hatred, death, cursings, nature, the beauty and sweetness of God, sins of the tongue, and why human beings praise God. In the second section (chapters 10–12), Lewis examines Psalms from the perspective of the Christian reader, devoting these chapters to explaining how Christians should read the book. Lewis posits that the book carries two interpretations, and that the second interpretation was entirely unknown to the Psalmist. In the second section, Lewis also suggests that Pagan texts might convey these secondary meanings as well. As Lewis concludes the book, he argues that the Book of Psalms not only conveys the coming of a Messiah, but also depicts Jesus as both the Messiah and the Lord.
Strengths of Lewis's Approach
Lewis was one of the most celebrated British writers in the fields of Medieval and Renaissance literature and Christian apologetics. Reflections on the Psalms is just one of several works he authored. The book is thought-provoking, memorable, and engaging. It offers a fresh understanding of one of the most elusive books in the Bible. More specifically, Lewis encourages the reader to view the Book of Psalms in light of its poetic beauty. An even more important strength is that Lewis clearly admires the Book of Psalms. He acknowledges the book's profound influence, describing how the Psalms give him the same delight David had when dancing before God.
Weaknesses and Critical Gaps
Nonetheless, a number of weaknesses are worth noting. First, Lewis begins his book with topics he views as more distasteful or unpleasant — judgment, cursings, death, and so forth. Such an opening denies readers the chance to ease into his perspectives. Immediately after the introduction, Lewis embarks on the subject of judgment. It is somewhat puzzling that the subject of judgment precedes that of cursings. Lewis justifies his prioritization of unattractive matters by asserting that Jews awaited Judgment Day anxiously (Lewis, Reflections on the Psalms, 8–10). For Lewis, Jews viewed judgment differently from the way contemporary Christians may.
Even so, Lewis's approach does help the reader comprehend the Book of Psalms from a different perspective. With this perspective, certain texts become clearer, permitting the reader to understand why Jews anticipated the Day of Judgment with such enthusiasm. According to Lewis, the Christian perspective of judgment is preferable to the Jewish perspective, but this does not necessarily mean that the Jewish approach should be disregarded (Lewis, Reflections on the Psalms, 12).
This assertion raises a fundamental question: why should the Christian perspective differ from the Jewish perspective? Lewis attempts to answer this in chapter 11, suggesting that the Book of Psalms carries a dual meaning. He gives the example of Melchizedek in the Old Testament, where Melchizedek is depicted as a high priest, while in the New Testament the reader would view him as a type of Christ. Whereas this allegory may be valid to some extent, it still does not fully explain why there should be two distinct approaches to justice. Lewis's arguments do not offer a satisfactory answer — a major weakness evident throughout much of the book. In essence, Lewis fails to provide a strong premise for his arguments, even though he asserts from the outset that the book was not intended to be an academic text. Whether he intended the book to be academic or not, the kind of arguments he presents warrant a solid foundation.
Another notable weakness in Lewis's book is the little or no use of symbolism — quite surprising given his strong background as a literary scholar. In chapters three and seven, Lewis dwells on the subject of hate, somewhat implying that the Bible condemns hate outright. This is not necessarily true. When viewed within the entirety of the Bible, hate can carry varied meanings, some of them symbolic. The story of the brothers Esau and Jacob is an instructive example. Although it is said that God hated Esau, His love for Jacob symbolized His election of Jacob — He chose Jacob for a far greater purpose. Missing such symbolic meanings represents a considerable weakness in Lewis's text.
Bibliography
Lewis, C. S. Reflections on the Psalms. Great Britain: Fount Paperbacks, 1958.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.