Death and Friendship in Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men
This essay examines John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men through the lens of its two dominant and paradoxically intertwined themes: friendship and death. Drawing on key moments involving George, Lennie, Crooks, Candy, and Curley's wife, the paper argues that Steinbeck consistently frames death as the ultimate expression of friendship — most strikingly in George's mercy killing of Lennie. The essay also explores how Crooks's isolation contrasts with George and Lennie's bond, how Candy's participation in their shared dream reinforces the novel's valuation of companionship, and how Curley's wife functions as a catalyst for the story's tragic conclusion. The analysis ultimately characterizes the novel as a morbid reflection of Western culture's preoccupation with death.
- Introduction: An Unlikely Setting for Friendship and Death: Thesis: death frames friendship throughout the novel
- George and Lennie: Friendship as the Novel's Foundation: Their bond distinguishes them from other farmhands
- The Mercy Killing: Death as the Ultimate Expression of Friendship: George killing Lennie as paradoxical act of care
- Crooks: Loneliness as the Absence of Friendship: Crooks's isolation contrasts George and Lennie's bond
- Candy and the Shared Dream: Candy joins the dream, validating friendship's value
- Curley's Wife: The Catalyst for Dissolution: A woman's death triggers the friendship's tragic end
- Conclusion: A Morbid Preoccupation: Novel reflects Western culture's fixation with death
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay builds its argument progressively, moving from the central friendship between George and Lennie outward to supporting characters (Crooks, Candy, Curley's wife), each of whom reinforces or complicates the central thesis in a distinct way.
- Direct textual quotations are used at each major analytical step, grounding interpretive claims in the primary source rather than relying solely on plot summary.
- The paper sustains a clear evaluative voice throughout, explicitly labeling the novel's thematic choices as "paradoxical," "perverse," or "morbid" — demonstrating critical engagement rather than neutral description.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates thematic contrast analysis: it pairs characters who embody opposite conditions (George and Lennie's deep friendship versus Crooks's enforced isolation) to illuminate the same theme from multiple angles. This technique allows the writer to argue that Steinbeck treats friendship not only through its presence but through its absence, making the argument more nuanced and textually supported.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a thesis-bearing introduction that frames both themes. It then devotes one body paragraph each to the George–Lennie relationship, the mercy killing, Crooks's loneliness, Candy's role, and Curley's wife as plot catalyst. A short concluding paragraph synthesizes the argument and broadens it to a cultural critique. The structure is linear and character-driven, making it easy to follow the escalating evidence.
Introduction: An Unlikely Setting for Friendship and Death
John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men is a somewhat strange and surprising read. The author selects a very unlikely setting — a farm populated predominantly by hired hands — for a tale largely predicated on the concept of friendship and its myriad interpretations and applications. However, there is a definite undercurrent that some readers might find disturbing, present in some of the most poignant moments of the novel. That undercurrent is one of death: the fate that Western civilization seemingly extols above most others. An analysis of some of the more pivotal moments in this novel reveals that it is ultimately a morbid work in which death is seen as the ultimate expression of friendship — which is more than a little unsettling, to say the least.
George and Lennie: Friendship as the Novel's Foundation
Thematically, it is difficult to distinguish the motifs of friendship and death, which are tightly intertwined throughout this novel. It is clear from the outset that friendship is one of the central concepts upon which the plot is built. Perhaps the two characters who typify this theme more than any other are George and Lennie, whose relationship is the kind rarely found in the oftentimes harsh and cruel world of farms and farmhands. In fact, their bond is more familial than anything else, which merely underscores its extremely close nature.
This is well demonstrated in the passage in which George tells Lennie: "Guys like us, that work on ranches, are the loneliest guys in the world. They got no family. They don't belong … With us it ain't like that. We got a future. We got somebody to talk to that gives a damn about us …" (Steinbeck, 1993). The people who care about George and Lennie, of course, are each other. George is emphasizing that because they share an enduring friendship, they are different from most other farmhands. That friendship is clearly special to both men and is the very thing that distinguishes them from the other characters in the novel.
The Mercy Killing: Death as the Ultimate Expression of Friendship
Because the relationship between the two men is so close and so emblematic of friendship, it is almost shocking that Steinbeck ends the novel with George killing Lennie. Granted, he does so in order to spare Lennie — who has an intellectual disability — the pain, anguish, and suffering of being killed by the lynch mob pursuing him after he accidentally kills a woman. Still, the very fact that the author expresses the unique friendship between George and Lennie by having the former slay the latter in what amounts to a mercy killing illustrates what seems like a characteristically Western preoccupation with death.
George, who is described early in the novel as having "sharp, strong features" (Steinbeck, 1993), leaves the scene of the killing distraught — his best friend is dead. These circumstances cause the sentimental reader to feel genuine sadness. That sadness is magnified, however, by the fact that Steinbeck has placed such a killing between companions as a means of reinforcing his theme of friendship. The relationship between these two themes is more than paradoxical: because George cares about Lennie, he kills him to keep others from doing so. The reader is left thinking that there surely must be a less morbid way to express the virtue and value of friendship than killing one's best friend.
Conclusion: A Morbid Preoccupation
In summary, Of Mice and Men is a twisted tale about a friendship so profound that one of the friends kills the other to prevent him from enduring an even more gruesome and frightening death. The prevalence of death as one of the novel's most prominent themes — second only to friendship — is certainly counterintuitive in a book ostensibly about human connection. As such, it makes the novel unsettling and, arguably, needlessly preoccupied with a fate all living things must eventually face — a preoccupation that is well aligned with too many aspects of Western culture more broadly.
References
Steinbeck, J. (1993). Of Mice and Men. New York: Penguin Books.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.