This paper presents a position-based analysis of three interconnected criminal justice issues: the abolition of capital punishment with particular focus on juvenile offenders, the concept of deterrence and recidivism within the corrections system, and the dangers of prison privatization. Drawing on the Supreme Court's ruling in Roper v. Simmons and Bureau of Justice Statistics recidivism data, the author argues against state-sanctioned execution on ethical grounds rooted in the Golden Rule, critiques deterrence as an externally imposed mechanism, and warns that corporatizing public prisons fosters corruption and systemic collapse. The paper reflects a consistent anti-punitive, rights-centered ethical framework throughout.
As a judge of Barbieland, I stand firmly in support of abolishing the death penalty — not only for juveniles, but for every person. Roper v. Simmons was a welcomed decision for my belief system, and I support its movement away from the violent and senseless practice of capital punishment, which does nothing to prevent crime but rather validates violence as a useful tactic to control troublesome populations. Scalia and O'Connor's dissent suggests that they support state-sanctioned murder as a viable tool.
According to the case, "The Court reaffirmed the necessity of referring to 'the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society' to determine which punishments are so disproportionate as to be cruel and unusual. The Court reasoned that the rejection of the juvenile death penalty in the majority of states, the infrequent use of the punishment even where it remains on the books, and the consistent trend toward abolition of the juvenile death penalty demonstrated a national consensus against the practice. The Court determined that today our society views juveniles as categorically less culpable than the average criminal."
My ethics are simple: do unto others as one would have done unto them — the Golden Rule. There is no room for state-sanctioned murder in my ethical framework. The death penalty represents a barbaric and loathsome application of the law, and those who support this anti-life position are endorsing pre-meditated killing under the color of justice. Regardless of the majority's opinion on culpability and how it relates to criminal responsibility, that concern is secondary to the sheer cruelty that accompanies pre-meditated murder, whether state-sanctioned or not.
Deterrence is a weak concept that does not arise from the external environment. Individuals must govern themselves and deter themselves from criminal or unhealthy behavior. If an offender is released early, no external deterrence mechanism should be imposed, given that true deterrence originates internally. Rather, a prisoner should only be released when he is genuinely ready to obey the Golden Rule.
Recidivism rates suggest that the current prison system is extremely flawed. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, "During 2007, a total of 1,180,469 persons on parole were at-risk of reincarceration. This includes persons under parole supervision on January 1 or those entering parole during the year. Of these parolees, about 16% were returned to incarceration in 2007." These numbers represent an acceptable rate, particularly given the extreme increase in new laws and regulations created over the preceding twelve years.
"Prison privatization as systemic corruption and tyranny"
You’re 77% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.