Developing Countries and the World Trade Organization
This paper explores the relationship between developing countries and the World Trade Organization (WTO), tracing the organization's origins from the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) through the Uruguay Round. It examines how WTO rules and dispute settlement mechanisms affect developing nations, the structural barriers limiting their participation, and the criticisms leveled at the organization regarding inequality and marginalization of less-developed economies. The paper also analyzes why developing countries form bargaining coalitions within the WTO framework and evaluates the validity of common criticisms, ultimately arguing that meaningful global economic progress requires genuine cooperation between developed and developing nations.
- Introduction to the WTO and Developing Countries: WTO origins, GATT successor, key criticisms overview
- WTO Definition of Developing Countries: Self-designation system and special rights for developing members
- The Role of Developing Countries in the WTO: Priorities, power imbalances, and participation barriers
- Bargaining Together: Coalitions and Their Importance: Why developing nations form coalitions and their benefits
- Validity of Criticisms Against the WTO: Evaluating and rebutting common anti-WTO arguments
- Conclusion: Call for cooperation between developed and developing nations
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper draws on a range of academic and policy sources to build a balanced argument, acknowledging both the limitations and potential benefits of WTO membership for developing nations.
- It uses concrete examples — such as Ecuador, South Africa, India, and Bangladesh winning cases against major powers — to counter generalizations and strengthen analytical credibility.
- The inclusion of a poetic epigraph on coalition-building adds rhetorical depth and frames the coalition discussion in a memorable, human context.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of counter-argument structure: it presents the dominant criticisms of the WTO and then systematically evaluates each one for validity, distinguishing between well-founded grievances and overstated or incorrect claims. This approach models critical thinking and avoids a one-sided treatment of a complex policy topic.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with historical context on the WTO's founding, moves through a definition of developing country status, examines structural participation barriers, dedicates a central section to coalition theory and bargaining power, evaluates the fairness of common criticisms, and closes with a call for cooperation over competition. Each section builds logically on the previous one, maintaining a clear argumentative thread throughout.
Introduction to the WTO and Developing Countries
The World Trade Organization (WTO) was established as an international organization in 1995 as a successor to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) ("World Trade Organization" 2009). The negotiations that extended for seven years — also known as the Uruguay Round — gave birth to the WTO, with vastly expanded responsibilities for handling and administering economic affairs at the international level. Since then, the WTO has unquestionably played a major role in the field of global governance. Its rules and processes have affected the economic standards and political orientation of member countries (Sampson 2001).
Compared with GATT, the World Trade Organization has operated with considerably more authority, owing to its strong institutional foundation and proficient dispute settlement system (Kwa 1998). GATT rules had their main influence on the imports and exports of a country, whereas WTO agreements greatly emphasize a country's overall economy (Das). Member countries that do not comply with WTO trade rules and regulations must ultimately face consequences through formal dispute proceedings. The WTO system allows member developing countries to satisfactorily address their legitimate concerns, and the organization does not impose investment or market-access requirements on developing countries in unreasonable or irrational ways (Skinner 2010).
However, there are several charges, criticisms, and accusations that the WTO has faced for a long time (Kwa 1998). Among the most prominent are the following:
The WTO's governing framework, its processes of agreement implementation, and its highly regarded dispute settlement system are criticized for serving the interests of developed countries while marginalizing the interests and concerns of developing member nations (Kwa 1998).
The least developed countries (LDCs) are sidelined when it comes to global trade. The products produced in LDCs also face continuous tariff escalations (Kwa 1998).
Because each member country has vastly different economic circumstances, the uniformly applied WTO rules have generated inequality (Kwa 1998). Free trade is simply not a viable option for the majority of countries.
Poor countries have been penalized and local development has been undermined by the WTO. Under its rules, the development policies pursued by industrialized countries in earlier decades cannot be replicated by today's developing countries ("Top Reasons to Oppose the WTO" 2011).
WTO Definition of Developing Countries
The WTO provides no formal definitions of "developed" or "developing" countries. It is the countries themselves that declare whether they are "developed" or "developing." Certain rights are extended to members that claim developing country status — for instance, they are granted longer transition periods following the provisions of some WTO agreements and are provided with required technical assistance ("Who are the developing countries in the WTO?" 2011). It can be concluded that "the WTO may not be the most protective organization of non-trade values, but it is the optimal system to integrate competing concerns and advocate on behalf of sustainable development" (Skinner 2010).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.