Ebola Ethics: Public Health Decisions in the 2014 Outbreak
This paper examines the ethical dimensions surrounding the 2014 West African Ebola outbreak, focusing on the use of the untested ZMapp serum, the tension between public safety and individual rights, and the competing obligations of healthcare professionals and policymakers. The paper analyzes the relevant legal precedents—including Jacobson v. Massachusetts and the Kefauver-Harris Drug Act of 1962—alongside the American Medical Association's Code of Ethics. It evaluates the utilitarian, justice-based, and liberty-based frameworks that shaped public health responses, and concludes by assessing whether officials responded proportionately to the threat.
- Introduction: Ebola as a Global Ethical Challenge: Ebola's spread and ZMapp's mixed results introduce core ethical tensions
- Analysis of the Ethical Issue: Legal precedents and professional codes conflict over untested vaccines
- Evaluating the Ethical Dimensions of Public Health Options: Utility, justice, and liberty frameworks applied to outbreak response
- Justification for a Specific Public Health Action: Proportionality of quarantine and vaccine use assessed against overreaction
- Conclusion: Officials balanced urgency with caution amid evolving ethical pressures
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its ethical analysis in concrete legal precedents (Jacobson v. Massachusetts, the Kefauver-Harris Drug Act) and professional codes (AMA Code of Ethics), giving abstract ethical claims an institutional anchor.
- It moves systematically through three distinct analytical tasks—issue analysis, ethical evaluation, and policy justification—providing a clear argumentative scaffold.
- The paper acknowledges competing stakeholder perspectives and tensions (e.g., safety vs. necessity, proportionality vs. overreaction) rather than presenting a one-sided argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied ethical analysis: it introduces a real-world crisis, maps it onto multiple ethical frameworks (utilitarianism, justice, respect for liberty), and tests those frameworks against existing law and professional standards. This technique—using concrete cases to stress-test ethical principles—is a hallmark of applied ethics writing in public health and bioethics courses.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with factual background on Ebola's transmission and mortality, then introduces the ethical tension created by the ZMapp serum. The body is organized into three functional sections: an analysis of the stakeholder conflict and legal landscape, an evaluation of ethical frameworks (utility, justice, liberty), and a justified policy recommendation that weighs proportionality against overreach. References follow APA formatting.
Introduction: Ebola as a Global Ethical Challenge
In March 2014, Ebola first emerged as a major threat within West Africa. It has a mortality rate of up to 90% and often infects different areas of the body simultaneously. This causes the liver and kidneys to become ineffective at disposing of waste, at which point the infected individual begins to experience a loss of bodily fluids and both internal and external bleeding (Garrett, 2014).
The incubation period ranges from two days to three weeks. During this time, those who are infected experience a number of symptoms, including fever, urinary problems, vomiting, headaches, sore throat, and a lack of coordination. Anyone in close proximity to infected individuals increases their own chances of exposure through contact with bodily fluids — such as semen, saliva, urine, blood, and breast milk — or through contact with contaminated surfaces. As a result, the disease spread quickly to different parts of the world and began infecting healthcare workers assisting these patients (Garrett, 2014).
To treat those infected, an untested serum called ZMapp was utilized. It was administered to two American patients and one Spanish nurse. The American patients made full recoveries and resumed their work; however, the Spanish nurse died of Ebola several weeks later. This outcome illustrated the vaccine's mixed results. These circumstances proved problematic, as they highlighted the tension between the urgent need to prevent the epidemic from spreading and the ethical boundaries being challenged by the scope and severity of the disease (Chedekel, 2014). Understanding what transpired requires analyzing the issue, evaluating the moral dimensions of public health options, and justifying a specific response. Together, these elements highlight the ethical challenges encountered throughout the crisis (Garrett, 2014).
References
Chedekel, L. (2014). Battling Ebola. BU Today. Retrieved from http://www.bu.edu/today/2014/battling-ebola-the-ethical-issues/
Ciolli, A. (2008). Mandatory school vaccinations. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 81(3), 129–137.
Del Rio, C. (2014). Ebola. Annals of Internal Medicine. Retrieved from
Fisher, W. (2014). Protecting healthcare workers from Ebola. Annals of Internal Medicine. Retrieved from
Food and drug law. (2014). Cornell Law School. Retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/food_and_drug_law
Garrett, L. (2014). Ebola: Story of an outbreak. New York, NY: Hachette Books.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.