This paper examines economic concerns and social class themes across three landmark science fiction films: Fritz Lang's Metropolis (1927), Don Siegel's Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956), and Chris Marker's La Jetée (1962). Drawing on Marxist analysis, Cold War anxieties, and historical parallels to Nazism and Stalinism, the paper argues that all three films use their dystopian settings to critique dehumanization under industrial capitalism, totalitarianism, and mass conformity. It traces how each film depicts class division, economic exploitation, and the suppression of individual identity, while comparing their markedly different conclusions about civilization's capacity for survival and redemption.
The paper demonstrates comparative textual analysis as an academic method, using close reading of narrative and symbolic elements — Rotwang as a "Red" figure, the underground camp in La Jetée as a Nazi concentration camp analogue — to build an argument about how science fiction encodes economic and political ideology. This technique shows students how to move from plot description to interpretive argument.
The paper opens with a thematic overview that links all three films through the concept of dehumanization. It then devotes a substantial section to Metropolis, the most overtly economic of the three, before moving to La Jetée and Body Snatchers in turn. The conclusion returns to the comparative frame, evaluating the ideological implications of each film's ending against broader European and American historical realities.
Metropolis, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, and La Jetée span four decades, although the latter two could be considered examples of Cold War science fiction. Metropolis was set during the Weimar Republic, and while certain scenes were eerily prophetic of Nazism, the city itself could also have represented New York or any other urban center of the future. For director Fritz Lang, the city was a symbol of Fordist mass production and mass consumption, with the workers down below brutalized by poverty, hunger, and dull, routine, robot-like jobs, while the middle and upper classes above were simultaneously dehumanized by mindless hedonism and nihilism, or by the dull, conformist clerical and administrative world.
Dehumanization was also a major theme of La Jetée, in which the survivors of a nuclear holocaust live underground, lacking even the basic necessities of food, water, and medical care, while what little society remains appears to be divided strictly into guards and prisoners. Almost all the people of Santa Mira in Invasion of the Body Snatchers have been dehumanized as well, since they have been taken over by alien seed pods and turned into emotionless zombies and conformists — each one a carbon copy of the other, driven only by the instinct to survive.
Of all three films, Metropolis (1927) is most obviously concerned with economics and social class — indeed, it is hardly concerned with anything else. In this classic science fiction drama, director Fritz Lang presents a broadly Marxist analysis of modern industrial society, but ultimately rejects the idea of Marxist revolution against capitalism. Lang insists that such a revolution would be purely nihilistic and destructive to both proletarians and bourgeoisie alike. His message is that to prevent the apocalypse of class warfare, there must be a union between those who labor with their hands and those who labor with their heads, and this can only come about through the heart.
In the film, the idealistic young humanitarian Maria and her lover Freder — the socially conscious son of the city's master, Joh Fredersen — bring about a reconciliation between capital and labor. They are nearly destroyed by the mad scientist Rotwang, a symbol of demented revenge and nihilistic violence, who programs a robot in Maria's exact likeness in order to incite the workers to revolt. In reality, however, this sinister, Frankenstein-like figure cares nothing about the workers; he only wishes to destroy the city entirely, driven by his hatred of Fredersen.
Rotwang — whose name seems to imply "Red," or Communist — was Lang's way of symbolically rebuking the Bolsheviks, even as the film clearly acknowledges that the conditions of the workers are appalling. In Metropolis, the workers literally live in a dark underground city and march in ranks to their jobs with heads bowed, like an army of industrial ants or zombies. Their work is totally dull, repetitive, and seemingly pointless, which is why they gather in the catacombs beneath the city like early Christian slaves, praying for a messiah or deliverer.
Meanwhile, the middle and upper classes enjoy a life of mindless hedonism above ground, with all the sex, stimulants, and entertainment that a mass consumer society can provide. Most of them are nearly as mindless and dehumanized as the workers, even though they have fine clothes, cars, and even airplanes. Rotwang employs the robot Maria as an erotic dancer to mesmerize them like a pagan goddess or demonic seductress, just as he uses her below to urge the workers toward revolution. When the workers rise up and destroy the machinery, they inadvertently flood their own underground city, nearly drowning all their children — though Freder and the real Maria rescue them in time.
In a striking indication of how dangerous a lower-class mob can be when aroused to mindless rage, the workers seize the robot Maria and burn her at the stake as a witch. So it is in the bright, modern, clean city of Metropolis that all manner of violent and irrational forces lurk just beneath the surface, while the middle and upper classes who manage the city and profit most from the mass-production machine remain largely unaware of them — until they finally explode.
You’re 39% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.