This paper examines ecotourism as defined by the International Ecotourism Society, tracing its evolution from the global environmental movement of the late 1980s and distinguishing it from related concepts such as nature-based, sustainable, and responsible tourism. It evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of ecotourism and its relationship to sustainable development. Four case studies — Hainan Island in China, Belize, Assam in India, and Thailand — illustrate how ecotourism operates in practice, highlighting the roles of government policy, community participation, and institutional cooperation. The paper also examines Thailand's Community-Based Ecotourism model and the challenges local communities face in managing tourism sustainably.
The International Ecotourism Society (2010) defines ecotourism as responsible travel to natural areas for the purpose of conserving the environment while simultaneously improving the well-being of local communities. It blends environmental conservation, community welfare, and sustainable travel. It is premised on clear principles: to minimize impact; to build environmental and cultural awareness and respect; to provide positive experiences for both tourists and hosts; to generate financial benefits for conservation; to empower local communities; and to increase sensitivity to the host country's political, environmental, and social climate (TIES).
Nature-based tourism is simply travel to natural places (TIES 2010). Ecotourism is nature-based tourism with the additional objective of benefiting the specific community environmentally, culturally, and economically. Sustainable tourism and responsible tourism are both derived from the concept of sustainable development. Sustainable development aims at meeting present needs without sacrificing those of future generations. Sustainable tourism, therefore, means meeting the needs of present tourists and host regions while conserving, protecting, and enhancing opportunities for future generations (TIES).
Ecotourism evolved from the global environmental movement, which surfaced in the late 1980s with renewed concern over deteriorating environmental conditions (TIES 2010). By the early 1990s, it had become a popular sector of the tourism industry alongside nature-based, cultural, heritage, and adventure tourism. It emphasized the principle that tourism should conserve host communities. Among the sub-concepts encouraged by ecotourism was sustainable tourism, which initiated mainstream sustainability in the industry by applying ecotourism principles and practices across varied segments of the tourism market (TIES).
The significance of ecotourism lies in its strong contributions to the environmental, social, cultural, and economic welfare of tourist destinations and their local communities (TIES 2010). It provides effective economic incentives to preserve, promote, and respect bio-cultural diversity while helping to protect an area's cultural heritage. At the same time, ecotourism empowers the surrounding communities of these destinations, supporting their economic survival and their region's sustainable development. It also contributes to the greening of the tourism industry in many respects. Participants in ecotourism are travelers of all ages and interests — responsible consumers who consciously seek to contribute to environmental sustainability. They engage in tourism activities that benefit the environment and plan their travel wisely to help minimize carbon emissions (TIES).
The formal objective of ecotourism is to reduce human impact on the planet's fragile ecosystems and on the cultures and economies of tourist destinations (Paige 2011). It also aims to provide indigenous communities with opportunities to escape extreme poverty. However, both objectives remain largely theoretical and ideal. In reality, ecotourism — like traditional tourism — has produced more disadvantages than advantages in many cases. The eco-dollars channeled into it are intended to enable local residents to enjoy economic benefits from their natural resources and to preserve endangered habitats. But without proper monitoring, ecotourism may not only fall short of these aims but may actually become a major threat to natural habitats. These resources and ecosystems are rarely preserved when the exploitative interests of investors and corporations — attracted by ecotourism — go unchecked. Legitimate and conscientious eco-travel providers are therefore essential: they uphold international labor standards and protect indigenous resources for future generations (Paige).
Ecotourism and sustainable development have been closely linked in many contexts (Stone 2002). Sustainable development meets present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own. Ideally and formally, ecotourism offers tourists a quality nature experience, allocates funds to support conservation efforts, aims to limit environmental impact, and provides socioeconomic benefits to local host communities. These goals may be achieved and the benefits may materialize, but current evidence shows that they are not met in the majority of cases. Furthermore, ecotourism's actual value has been evaluated at relatively few specific destinations (Stone).
Hainan is a tropical island off the southwest coast of Guangdong Province (Stone 2002). It has a vibrant tourism industry, most of which occurs in coastal areas. The island has successfully attracted largely domestic tourists from mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong. However, economic opportunities for local residents have been limited, and mobility has been compromised by infrastructure construction in many locations, such as the Eastern Expressway (Xie & Wall 2000, as cited in Stone). The Department of Lands (1999) recognized Hainan Island as the best environmentally preserved province in China. Some of the world's most biologically diverse resources can still be found there (Weisun 2000, as cited in Stone), including a range of protected areas (Wang 1993, as cited in Stone). Its tropical forests, mountains, mangroves, and beaches make Hainan one of the most popular tourism destinations in the country. It is also a special economic zone, subject to major development, with special rules and investment incentives established to facilitate that process (Gormsen 1995, as cited in Stone).
"Regional ecotourism outcomes in three countries"
"Thailand's CBET model and community-led tourism"
"Community opposition to energy projects and mangrove restoration"
You’re 32% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.