This paper examines the Emancipation Proclamation—President Abraham Lincoln's declaration freeing enslaved people in Confederate states—through several analytical questions. It discusses the multiple factors that led to its issuance, including Lincoln's moral opposition to slavery, the military utility of depriving the South of enslaved labor, and the prospect of enrolling freed Black men in the Union Army. The paper also considers how the Proclamation transformed the Civil War's character, evaluates the extent to which it instigated emancipation versus affirming an abolitionist movement already underway, and assesses whether the Union could have prevailed without it. The conclusion suggests that while Lincoln's motives were partly strategic, the Proclamation was pivotal to Union victory.
The Emancipation Proclamation was President Abraham Lincoln's declaration that enslaved people in Confederate states were to be freed and that slavery itself was being abolished in those territories. The South did not take kindly to this, and it completely changed the tone of the Civil War. This paper addresses several analytical questions about the Proclamation: What factors led to its implementation? How did it change the nature of the Civil War? To what degree did the Proclamation itself instigate emancipation, and to what degree did it affirm a process that enslaved people had already begun? Finally, could the Union have won the war without it? While it is easy to evaluate decisions in hindsight, the Emancipation Proclamation both continued an already-started process and helped the Union win the Civil War to a significant degree.
Several interconnected factors led to the Emancipation Proclamation and its implementation. First, Lincoln believed that slavery was morally wrong. Second, enslaved people were being used in the Confederate war effort, and the Proclamation offered a way to undermine that advantage for the Union. Third, as battles wore on, the focus of the war effort shifted — at least in the minds of Republican leaders — from mere preservation of the Union to the active freeing of enslaved people. Fourth, freed Black men could actually join the Union Army and fight against the Confederacy. Fifth, there was even some early consideration that freed enslaved people might eventually be recolonized in Africa or Central America after the war, for what Lincoln believed would be the benefit of both races. Many of these outcomes came to pass, but the last point notably did not (Borade, 2015).
This shift in purpose absolutely changed the character of the war. The Confederacy actively sought international support and recognition from other nations, but this support was not forthcoming, largely due to the moral dimension of the conflict as framed by the Union. Britain and France, both of which had already abolished slavery, could not justify supporting a nation — however short-lived — that still practiced it. They ultimately lent their sympathy to the Union cause instead.
There is no question that the freeing of enslaved people changed the direction of the war. As many as 180,000 freed Black men joined the Union effort (Borade, 2015), a contribution that proved strategically decisive. It is important to note, however, that Lincoln himself did not believe that Black Americans were equal to white Americans, nor was he a committed abolitionist in principle. The Proclamation was, in large part, a military strategy, and technically it applied only to Confederate states — not to slaveholding border states that remained in the Union.
"Pre-war abolitionist movement and slave resistance"
"Black soldiers' role in deciding Union victory"
Borade, G. (2015). Purpose and effects of the Emancipation Proclamation. Buzzle. Retrieved October 28, 2015, from
History. (2015). Abolitionist movement — Black history. HISTORY.com. Retrieved October 28, 2015, from http://www.history.com/topics/black-history/abolitionist-movement
You’re 61% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.