This lab report investigates the key factors that influence enzyme activity, including oxidation, competitive and non-competitive inhibition, substrate specificity, and temperature-induced denaturation. Three experiments are described: the first observes a color change produced by catechol oxidase reacting with catechol; the second examines how the non-competitive inhibitor phenylthiourea prevents enzyme activity; and the third measures starch degradation rates at four temperatures (4°C, 24°C, 80°C, and 100°C). Results show that enzymes perform optimally at room temperature and become denatured — losing their functional three-dimensional structure — at elevated temperatures, contradicting the general assumption that heat always accelerates chemical reactions.
The paper demonstrates the use of observable physical evidence (color change, solution clarity) as a proxy for measuring biochemical reactions — a standard technique in undergraduate enzyme labs. By interpreting color transitions against expected outcomes, the author links qualitative observation to quantitative conclusions about reaction completion and enzyme function.
The paper opens with a brief introduction defining enzymes and outlining the study's purpose. The results section presents three experiments in sequence, with Chart 1 data broken down by individual test tube condition. The discussion synthesizes results, introduces the concept of denaturation to explain unexpected outcomes, and draws a final conclusion about the relationship between temperature and enzyme effectiveness. A Works Cited section follows in MLA format.
This study details a basic analysis of the factors that commonly impact the effectiveness of enzymes. The factors examined include oxidation, inhibitors, and substrate specificity. The final portion of the study evaluates the effects of denaturation resulting from an enzyme's exposure to heat. Included is a comprehensive chart (Chart 1) showing enzyme activity at various temperatures over time in minutes.
Enzymes are proteins that are vital to chemical reactions. In the human body, nearly all cellular processes depend on enzymes to function properly (Smith, 1997). Enzymes are specialized proteins, however, and require certain triggers in order to function. These triggers, known as oxidases, prompt the enzyme to bond with other proteins and complete the necessary functions. For instance, most enzymes require a certain amino acid in order to properly bond and react. Additionally, enzymes have a particular specification for the substrate necessary for optimal reaction. Most substrate requirements involve pH level, but temperature can also be a factor depending on the enzyme (Silverman, 1995).
The purpose of this study is to determine what factors are required for certain enzymes to react with solutions. Factors such as oxidase, inhibitors, substrates, and temperature are studied, and conclusions are drawn based on the enzyme's reaction to these changes.
Experiment one was conducted to observe the chemical reaction that occurs when a catechol oxidase and a catechol are combined. The theory was that the separation of electrons would result in a visual color change as evidence that the oxidase was correct for the particular enzyme. If the enzyme oxidase was not correct, there would be no color change, because enzymes require a specific oxidase to work. In this case, a reaction took place resulting in the transfer of electrons from the catechol. The visual result was a color change from colorless to brown. This confirms that the correct oxidase was used for the experiment.
Experiment two was conducted to observe the effects of an inhibitor on catechol oxidase activity in a solution. The theory was that if the solution acted as a competitive inhibitor, there would be a visual change in the solution different from that observed in the first experiment. If the solution was a non-competitive inhibitor, there would be no change because the oxidase would be completely inhibited from reacting with the catechol. Here, phenylthiourea was added as a non-competitive inhibitor. It was classified as non-competitive because there was no visual change in the solution even when the added solution concentration was doubled. Thus, no actual chemical reaction occurred, and the catechol was prevented from reacting.
Experiment three was conducted to measure the effect of temperature on the chemical reactions of enzymes. The theory was that heat increases the reaction rate, allowing the enzyme to react more efficiently than at colder temperatures. During this experiment, four test tubes each containing 2 ml of starch and 5 ml of water were set to the following temperatures: 4°C, 24°C, 37°C, and 80°C. The chemical reaction in this experiment was considered successful when the starch in the test tubes was completely consumed and the solution became colorless. Chart 1 below shows all lab results, with an explanation of each test tube following.
The first test tube was placed in an ice bath and the temperature lowered to 4°C, just above freezing. The theory was that the enzyme would be less efficient in this solution than in the others. The ice bath test tube produced a slow reaction. The solution started out as blue/black at T=0. No further change was observed until T=3 minutes, at which point the solution began turning a lighter color. At T=4.5 minutes it changed to amber and began to lighten further. At T=8.5 minutes it changed to clear, indicating that the starch had been fully consumed.
The second test tube was maintained at room temperature, approximately 24°C. This tube produced an almost instant reaction at T=0.5 minutes. By T=1 minute, the solution had lightened significantly. At T=1.5 minutes, the starch was degraded and the solution was clear. This was by far the fastest reaction observed across all conditions.
The first hot water bath solution was brought to and maintained at 80°C. The theory was that this test tube should react even faster than the room temperature tube due to the added heat. At T=1.5 minutes, the solution was black. At T=2.5 minutes, it changed to blue. After that point, the solution no longer reacted. The starch failed to fully degrade, indicating that the enzyme failed to complete the process.
The second hot water bath solution was brought to and maintained at 100°C. At T=0.5 minutes, the solution was black. The solution was failing to change, so an additional drop was added at T=2.5 minutes. By T=3 minutes, the solution changed to purple, and by T=5.5 minutes it lightened to blue. The solution failed to further convert the starch beyond that point.
You’re 61% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.