This paper examines ethical investment as it applies to charitable organizations in the United Kingdom. It traces the origins of socially responsible investment (SRI), the establishment of bodies such as the Ethical Investment Research Service (EIRIS), and the growth of ethical funds as a competitive asset class. Drawing on survey data, fund manager commentary, and press reporting, the paper shows that while public opinion strongly favors charities that invest ethically, more than half of UK charities still do not comply with basic SRI guidelines. The paper argues that charities risk reputational damage by neglecting SRI and concludes that ethical funds offer competitive returns comparable to conventional investment approaches.
The paper models evidence-led argumentation: it states a claim (charities lack adequate SRI policies despite public demand), supports it with survey statistics and expert testimony, acknowledges opposing views, and then rebuts them with empirical performance data. This structure — claim, evidence, counter, rebuttal — is a reliable pattern for persuasive academic writing.
The paper opens with a contextual discussion of ethics in business before narrowing to the UK's ethical investment landscape and the role of EIRIS. It then reviews fund performance data, presents public-opinion survey results, and catalogues specific charity investment controversies. A brief counterargument from a charity finance director is followed by a supporting quotation from WWF-UK. The conclusion synthesizes the findings and offers a forward-looking observation about changing investment behavior.
Ethics and business are now so closely connected that one cannot discuss the latter without referring to the former. Most people today believe that ethics should be a part of every business policy, and the public has become increasingly conscious of the ethical responsibilities of commercial organizations. This awareness has grown from the realization that while all businesses may improve the economic condition of a country and accelerate economic activity, they do not necessarily benefit society, and many remain unaware of their responsibility toward the wider community.
For example, tobacco companies are among the most significant economic contributors in many countries. Tobacco sells well, and the income it generates benefits broader economic activity — GDP increases, employment rises, and so on. However, this is no longer considered sufficient. People are no longer interested solely in the money-making aspect of business; they have become more aware of the broader impact of such economic activities.
For this reason, although tobacco companies are highly profitable, they are not viewed as ethical organizations, since their products are harmful to community health. To improve their image, such companies attempt to invest in environmental initiatives. But because the very nature of their business deviates from generally accepted ethical practices, many people refrain from investing in such firms. This gives rise to the concept of socially responsible investment. After its successful start in the United States, the concept rapidly gained prominence in the UK and across Europe, as people began consulting specialist organizations before committing their money, in order to ensure that the funds they invest in are ethical in nature.
People have become more interested in understanding how their money is utilized. Many investors place their savings in investment institutions rather than directly purchasing stocks, but now they need to know where those institutions are directing their capital. In other words, people increasingly believe in socially responsible investment (SRI). Churches and charities are among the most closely monitored social bodies, because the way they invest their money can become a serious issue of concern for the whole nation. Charities and churches therefore consult organizations such as EIRIS before making investment decisions.
The ethical investment model was developed specifically to prevent the unethical use of savings. In the UK, ethical investment became institutionalized after it was found that individuals and charities were deeply concerned about how their money was being used by banks and investment institutions. They wanted to distance themselves from unethical organizations, including those involved in the production of arms, tobacco, and nuclear power. Initially, both government and financial authorities in the US and UK feared that ethical investment would curtail the overall rate of investment and that ethical funds would perform poorly. However, contrary to this belief, ethical funds have consistently performed better than their non-ethical counterparts.
Ethical funds — encompassing environmental, green, and socially responsible funds — are now among the most important and fastest-growing sectors within the unit trust industry. They have been part of the investment landscape for more than twenty years, but it is only recently that their importance has been fully recognized, due in large part to their exceptional long-term performance. Ethical funds in the UK serve an estimated 469,000 investors and are worth approximately 7.2 billion euros. Their healthy growth has turned them into solid investment vehicles, allowing people to make money with a clearer conscience.
The Ethical Investment Research Service (EIRIS) is the most important organization in the UK providing services related to ethical consultancy and monitoring. It scrutinizes the ethical practices of various firms and compiles a list of the most ethical — and reasonably profitable — firms in which to invest. This list is regularly used by charities and churches to ensure their savings are being deployed by ethics-oriented organizations.
EIRIS works primarily for "the growing number of charities and church funds who needed a centralized body to monitor ethical investment because their faiths may exclude certain practices such as drinking alcohol or gambling. The Quaker movement established the first 'ethical' unit trust in the UK, the Friends Provident Stewardship fund, in 1984, and it remains one of the leading funds in this arena and one of the strictest in its criteria — or 'dark green' in ethical fund terms — and currently one of the top performers in the ethical sector." (Cathy Growney, 2002)
EIRIS has also developed a clear definition of ethical or socially responsible investment. It states that SRI is "any area of the financial sector where the principles of the investor influence which organization or venture they choose to place their money with, or how the investor uses their power as a shareholder." (Growney, 2002)
Russell Sparkes, fund manager of the Central Finance Board of the Methodist Church, has noted that charities are increasingly investing in ethical funds. By 1998, the amount invested in ethical funds by charitable organizations had reached 8 billion euros. Research by the Edinburgh-based WM Company provides further context: "Even though the investment strategy is based on personal beliefs, ethical investments can provide competitive returns and even have an advantage over more conventional investment approaches. Analyzing the impact of ethical investment on returns, it discovered that competitive returns are achievable but at a cost of some extra volatility. An Ethical Charity Universe, set up for the purpose of the analysis, found that between 1992 and 1995 there was an identical UK equity return to that of unconstrained funds — 15.5 per cent per year — suggesting that the exclusion of certain stocks did not appear to have a major impact." (Bien, 1997)
Alastair MacDougall, research and consulting coordinator at WM Company, concurs: "We discovered no systematic difference in returns between ethical and non-ethical portfolios. The evidence suggests that ethically constructed portfolios can provide competitive returns. And due to the inherent smaller company bias, there could be a performance advantage in the longer term over portfolios using the more conventional investment approaches." (Bien, 1997)
2. Melanie Bien, "Meet the moral money-makers: European ethical investment funds." The European, 22 May 1997.
3. Mat Smith, "How to ruin your saintly image: are charities socially responsible?" New Statesman, 26 May 2003.
4. "Ethical Investment: The Challenges." CAF Research / NOP Solutions, September 2001. Accessed 8 March 2005.
You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.