Ethics and Social Responsibility for Global Entrepreneurs
This paper critically assesses the ethical and social responsibility challenges facing entrepreneurs who expand their businesses globally. Beginning with an examination of cultural factors and the Hofstede Cultural Dimensions Model, the paper explores how cultural norms shape ethical expectations across nations. It analyzes entrepreneurial leadership qualities — particularly transformational leadership and transparency — and uses Marc Benioff and Salesforce.com as a central case study of doing well by doing good. The paper also considers collaborative entrepreneurship models and the growing role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a mandatory element of market entry in developing economies. Examples span North America, the UK, Ireland, and India.
- Introduction: Ethics and Entrepreneurship in a Global Context: Framing the entrepreneur-ethics paradox and paper scope
- Cultural Factor Considerations When Starting a New Business: How cultural norms shape global expansion success
- The Hofstede Cultural Dimensions Model: Applying Hofstede's framework to cross-cultural ethics
- Assessing Entrepreneurial Leadership and Its Implications: Transformational leadership and social network transparency
- Collaborative Entrepreneurship and Ethical Transparency: Collaborative models and Benioff's ethical business DNA
- Conclusion: Trust and social responsibility as expansion strategy
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds abstract ethical concepts in concrete, real-world examples — Salesforce.com's volunteer benefit programs and Tata's job guarantees to the Indian government give the argument tangible weight.
- Integrates an established analytical framework (Hofstede Cultural Dimensions Model) to move the discussion of ethics from intuition to a structured, comparative tool entrepreneurs can actually use.
- Maintains a consistent thesis throughout: that authentic social responsibility is not a compliance checkbox but a strategic driver of successful global expansion.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses a single extended case study — Marc Benioff and Salesforce.com — as a recurring anchor across multiple sections. This technique allows the author to apply different analytical lenses (cultural fit, leadership theory, collaborative models) to the same subject, demonstrating how one entrepreneur embodies the paper's broader claims without needing to introduce entirely new evidence at each turn.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a conceptual framing of the entrepreneur-ethics paradox, then moves through cultural considerations, a framework section on Hofstede's model, a leadership analysis centered on transformational qualities, and a discussion of collaborative entrepreneurship before concluding with actionable takeaways. Each section builds on the previous one, progressing from external cultural environment to internal leadership character to relational strategy.
Introduction: Ethics and Entrepreneurship in a Global Context
Intuitively, the thought of ethics and entrepreneurship being aligned seems paradoxical — even opposed to each other. When one considers the intensity of effort and focus it takes to bring a business to life and keep its vital functions running, there is ample opportunity for ethical boundary debate and stretching. Studies of entrepreneurship indicate this boundary-based mindset toward ethics rather than hard-and-fast compliance (Wempe, 2005). To the extent an entrepreneur is a nonconformist is the extent to which they will fundamentally reshape industries and society (Barbee, 2005).
This is certainly the case with Steve Jobs, who reshaped the music and personal MP3 markets, and Marc Benioff, CEO and founder of Salesforce.com. This latter company, just ten years old at the time of writing, already had over $1 billion in global sales and launched its initial European operations out of a hotel in London before moving to Ireland to open sales offices for global companies located there for the tax advantages. These are just two of many examples spanning North America, the United Kingdom, and Europe — with the Salesforce.com example used for purposes of this analysis.
This analysis concentrates on the ethical and social responsibility issues that an international or global entrepreneur faces when choosing to expand their business globally. Beginning with cultural implications of ethics and social responsibility and progressing through essential qualities of leadership to an assessment of collaborative models, this paper is intended as a roadmap for entrepreneurs looking to expand globally. The cases discussed are drawn primarily from North America, the UK, and Ireland.
What is fascinating about this analysis is the emergence of a new entrepreneurial mindset centered on doing well by doing good. The reciprocity of social responsibility, while difficult to quantify, has significant implications for a new business's brand and reputation in the market (Yeung, Selen, Zhang, & Huo, 2009). This goes beyond lip service, however, as the most ethically operated new businesses often provide metrics in the form of balanced scorecards documenting their ethical and socially responsible behaviors over time (Hannafey, 2003). Studies indicate there is no single defining moment or epiphany when an entrepreneur looking to expand globally chooses an ethically higher road of conduct or embraces social responsibility (Fuller & Tian, 2006). Rather, it is ingrained through their environment, with the most significant influence being a utilitarian-based management philosophy modeled by mentors and coaches. These influences demonstrate the value of nonconformity in creating exceptional value for new companies and their many stakeholders (Brenkert, 2009).
References
Barbee, B. (2005). Ethics of entrepreneurship. Baylor Business Review, 22(2), 42.
Bernoff, J., & Li, C. (2008). Harnessing the power of the oh-so-social web. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(3), 36–42.
Brenkert, G. (2009). Innovation, rule breaking and the ethics of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 448.
Derry, R. (2002). Seeking a balance: A critical perspective on entrepreneurship and the good society. Ruffin Series in Business Ethics: Ethics and Entrepreneurship, 197–207.
Dunham, L. (2010). From rational to wise action: Recasting our theories of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(4), 513–530.
The Economist. (2006, February 25). Survey: The good company, 10.
Fuller, T., & Tian, Y. (2006). Social and symbolic capital and responsible entrepreneurship: An empirical investigation of SME narratives. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 287–304.
Goldstein, A. (2008). Emerging economies' transnational corporations: The case of Tata. Transnational Corporations, 17(3), 85.
Hannafey, F. T. (2003). Entrepreneurship and ethics: A literature review. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(2), 99–110.
Hemingway, C. A. (2005). Personal values as a catalyst for corporate social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(3), 233–249.
Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultural constraints in management theories. The Executive, 7(1), 81.
Johnston, V. R. (1996). The entrepreneurial management transformation: From privatization, reinventing, and reengineering, to franchising, efficiency, and entrepreneurial ethics. Policy Studies Journal, 24(3), 439.
Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189.
Murphy, A. (1994). The seven (almost) deadly sins of high-minded entrepreneurs. Inc., July 1, 47.
Payne, D., & Joyner, B. E. (2006). Successful U.S. entrepreneurs: Identifying ethical decision-making and social responsibility behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(3), 203.
Rocha, H., & Miles, R. (2009). A model of collaborative entrepreneurship for a more humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 445–462.
Sharma, M. K., Agarwal, P., & Ketola, T. (2009). Hindu philosophy: Bridging corporate governance and CSR. Management of Environmental Quality, 20(3), 299–310.
Strautmanis, J. (2008). Employees' values orientation in the context of corporate social responsibility. Baltic Journal of Management, 3(3), 346–358.
Wempe, J. (2005). Ethical entrepreneurship and fair trade. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(3), 211–220.
Yeung, J., Selen, W., Zhang, M., & Huo, B. (2009). The effects of trust and coercive power on supplier integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 66.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.