This paper examines the development and application of corporate ethics policies within the technology sector, with a focus on three major companies: Microsoft, Nokia, and Intel. Beginning with a brief history of how written codes of ethics emerged from personal moral codes to formalized business documents, the paper analyzes how each corporation defines and communicates its ethical values—covering areas such as integrity, human rights, workplace conduct, environmental responsibility, anti-piracy, and conflicts of interest. The paper also considers the broader debate over whether companies are obligated to make their ethics policies publicly available, and concludes by identifying the common principles shared across corporate codes of conduct in the industry.
In the early stages of civilization, ethics was considered largely a personal moral code — a set of unwritten rules governing behavior. As time passed, however, humanity felt the need to formalize and strengthen these rules. Written codes of ethics rapidly penetrated most domains of activity, regulating the actions and behavior of politicians, economists, environmentalists, medical doctors, and representatives of the law.
The ethics policies applied within the economic sector addressed external norms of behavior, such as a company's conduct towards clients, suppliers, and the environment, the legality of its actions, and its commitment to fair competition. At the same time, codes of ethics were applied to the internal activities of companies, designed to ensure fair treatment of all employees. For instance, ethics was applied to issues of racial discrimination, family structure, sexuality, and how society views the roles of individuals — leading to several distinct fields of applied ethics, including feminism.
Today, most companies possess a personalized set of ethics policies, typically gathered in written documents that present the moral and behavioral rules employees and management must follow, along with the sanctions to be applied in the event of violations. Most current ethics policies focus on creating and sustaining a proper work environment, promoting the values of integrity, honesty, and professional excellence, as well as ensuring legality, responsibility, avoidance of conflicts of interest, and the reporting of all observed violations of the ethics code.
More and more individuals and organizations are placing greater emphasis on codes of ethics. When clearly and correctly developed and applied, ethics policies offer business transparency and can serve as evidence of a company's innocence in cases of fraud or scandal. Despite this general trend, a large number of companies in the field of electrical engineering refuse to develop and implement a clear code of ethics, or, if they have one, choose not to make it public. Corporations such as Microsoft, HP, and IBM can easily be included in this category.
When a user searches for "ethics," "code of ethics," or "ethics policies" using Microsoft's internal search engine on Microsoft.com, the results return a series of articles on how to develop and implement a code of ethics, as well as references to software codes of ethics — but no clearly stated corporate code is made available to the public. When questioned about this, Microsoft representatives responded that the company does have a set of ethics policies to guide its activity, but saw no reason to publish them online.
Although a clear set of ethical rules is not available to the general public, Microsoft's website does offer some elements of its moral code. The corporation states that its actions are guided by its values, which it also considers its ethical rules. These values are presented in the Mission and Values section of the website and include: integrity and honesty, passion for customers, partners, and technology, openness and respectfulness, taking on significant challenges and following them through, constructive self-criticism, self-improvement and personal excellence, and accountability to customers, shareholders, partners, and employees for commitments, results, and quality.
Regarding integrity, Microsoft states: "Our managers and employees must always act with the utmost integrity and be guided by what is ethical and right for our customers." In other words, Microsoft's code of ethics affirms the company's commitment to fairness and honesty in its relationships with all parties — from employees and the general public to legal authorities and shareholders.
Also relevant to Microsoft's ethical stance is its software anti-piracy policy. In March 2006, the corporation articulated its position on the further usage and distribution of its software products: "Making, supplying and distributing unauthorized duplicates of copyrighted software violates copyright law and is contrary to the standards by which the Sales Representative conducts business." The company also outlined the main principles of legal software use and affirmed its strict policy of combating and penalizing piracy.
The most severe criticism Microsoft has received regarding its ethics policies relates to its creation of a monopoly market for distributing its products — an issue that has been disputed in courts of law. Overall, while Microsoft does not make a clearly written code of ethics publicly available, its actions have generally been in accordance with moral business standards. The corporation has consistently demonstrated fairness towards its employees, promoting and rewarding high-quality work.
Nokia is an undisputed leader in the mobile telephone market, a position achieved in part through the implementation of clear ethical rules that provide employees with a fair and pleasant workplace, and customers with the best possible products and services.
"Nokia's comprehensive ethics covering rights, environment, suppliers"
"Intel's policies on IP, transparency, bribes, and environment"
"Common ethical principles across major tech corporations"
You’re 44% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.