This paper reviews key chapters of Terry L. Cooper's The Responsible Administrator: An Approach to Ethics for the Administrative Role, focusing on how public administrators navigate ethical responsibilities. The paper explores tensions between internal and external organizational controls, the problem of authority overreach, and Cooper's concept of "constitutional bureaucracy." It also examines the principal-agent relationship, conflicts of loyalty between superiors and the public, the risks and moral necessity of whistle-blowing, and Cooper's model of responsible administration. The paper demonstrates how objective and subjective responsibilities interact across organizational levels, arguing that ethical accountability must be distributed throughout an organization rather than concentrated at its top.
The paper models effective textual analysis of a nonfiction academic work: it moves chapter by chapter while synthesizing overarching themes, uses direct quotation strategically to anchor claims, and integrates the author's framework (principal-agent theory, constitutional bureaucracy, the four levels of ethical contemplation) into its own analytical narrative rather than listing chapter contents passively.
The paper opens with a framing statement about Cooper's central concern — responsible conduct from a manager's perspective — then proceeds through chapters six, seven, and eight in sequence. Each section addresses a distinct ethical dimension: organizational controls, authority limits, loyalty conflicts, whistle-blowing risks, and finally a synthesis of Cooper's model. The conclusion ties the chapter-level analysis back to the broader argument that ethical accountability must be distributed across all organizational levels.
Terry L. Cooper's book The Responsible Administrator: An Approach to Ethics for the Administrative Role examines the problem of maintaining responsible conduct from the manager's viewpoint. Managers are often left feeling confused when they are unable to achieve the results they want as rules, policies, training, laws, and other organizational arrangements change (Cooper 164). Cooper points out that even though we often think of unethical behavior and willfully insufficient work performance as two very distinct problems, both are forms of negligent behavior. As Cooper writes, "Both represent a diverting of the public's resources from the fulfillment of its preferences and demands" (164).
Chapter six examines the conflicts that exist between internal and external controls. The chapter offers the example of a police force that was prepared to hire a certain officer, until speculation arose that he might be gay. Even after being reminded that the police force was an equal opportunity employer, the hiring personnel still admitted that bringing this man on could potentially cost the force a significant amount of money — not to mention that many officers would be unwilling to work alongside him due to deep-seated prejudice. This illustrates that those entrusted with hiring decisions need to hold values that genuinely reflect the law. When individuals in hiring positions are biased against certain groups, equality across society is inevitably undermined.
Organizations need to be managed in an efficient and ethical manner. Simply eliminating hierarchical structures is not a solution, but responsibility must come from every corner and level of an organization.
The deeper problem lies in authority and the insufficient limits placed on those who hold it. Too many people in positions of authority overstep their boundaries while simultaneously keeping certain individuals oppressed. Cooper argues that it is important for people to know who is in charge within an organization and what the precise limits of their power are, so that the public can remain alert to any unethical behavior. Those who hold authority are therefore expected to be held accountable for their actions and conduct. As Cooper states, "The formal and informal organizations must be brought into congruence by reducing the need for political maneuvering, which is at odds with the formal decision-making structures, or even the possibility of engaging in such activities" (180).
Cooper also discusses "constitutional bureaucracy" — a system in which authority is clearly outlined at every level. Within this model, there is room for consultation and negotiation at all times, not merely when a crisis emerges. Power is therefore not concentrated solely at the top of the organizational pyramid but is distributed throughout different levels, enabling the organization to function more efficiently and with fewer crises.
Chapter seven, entitled "Safeguarding Ethical Autonomy in Organizations: Dealing with Unethical Superiors and Organizations," draws on ideas introduced in chapter three, framing administrative responsibility in objective terms along two main organizational dimensions: responsibility to superiors and responsibility for subordinates (199). The principal-agent theory is applied here, with the manager cast as a principal who must oversee the performance of workers beneath them — the agents — shaping that relationship in a "general and abstract" way (199).
Cooper notes that a problem of loyalty arises when we try to define the limits of our objective responsibility to superiors. "Typically, it is a matter of conflict between our formal obligation to those with a higher level of responsibility and authority within the organization on the one hand, and our fiduciary relationship to the public on the other" (200). This tension is especially visible in public administrators, who are accountable both to their superiors and to the public — "proximately and routinely to the former, but ultimately and more importantly to the latter" (200). Cooper argues that when such conflicting loyalties arise, the obligation always lies with the public, and therefore a breach of loyalty to the organization is sometimes necessary. This, of course, is precisely what whistle-blowing is about (200). Whistle-blowing can have serious adverse effects on the individual who comes forward, and feelings of loneliness frequently accompany the decision. Cooper presents notable examples of whistle-blowing cases in chapter six, yet he emphasizes that many have simply "gone away quietly" (202). While silence may seem like the safer personal choice, it means the public will never learn the truth — and so the individual carries a genuine moral responsibility to ensure that unethical behavior is not allowed to persist at any level, since it will eventually seep into the core of the organization and back into society.
You’re 56% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.