This paper examines the 2004 European Union enlargement, in which ten countries — primarily from Central and Eastern Europe — joined the fifteen existing EU member states in the largest expansion in the bloc's history. The paper analyzes the requirements candidate countries had to meet for accession, including economic restructuring, privatization, and adoption of EU laws and regulations. It evaluates the perspectives of original EU members, the new member states, and outside nations, particularly the United States. Key topics include foreign direct investment, labor market restrictions, border controls, geopolitical tensions with neighboring non-member states, budgetary disputes, and the social consequences of rapid economic liberalization in Eastern Europe.
The paper demonstrates effective use of counterargument and critical balance. Rather than simply celebrating the enlargement, it presents optimistic economic projections alongside evidence of social deterioration, wage inequality, and political instability in the accession countries. This technique — acknowledging the strongest version of opposing views before rebutting or contextualizing them — is a hallmark of rigorous academic argumentation.
The paper opens with background on the enlargement and its scale, then moves systematically through accession requirements, citizen-level changes, economic effects, and foreign investment flows. A pivotal middle section addresses social consequences and political conflict, followed by geopolitical analysis covering EU–Russia tensions and U.S. interests. The paper closes with internal EU disputes over labor mobility and budgetary priorities, ending on a cautiously optimistic economic note.
When ten countries recently joined the fifteen existing European Union (EU) member states, the event represented the largest enlargement of the European Union in its history (Golino, 2003). One of the major perceived benefits of this union is that the countries formed an economic, political, and military coalition with a combined population of 450 million people and an economy that produces approximately one-quarter of the world's annual output.
The new members include eight Central European countries — the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovenia, and Slovakia — plus Malta and the southern Greek-Cypriot part of Cyprus (Golino, 2003). Their inclusion is expected to further shape the future character of the EU, how it governs itself, and the global role it pursues. It is also seen as an affirmation of European identity and of a break from Europe's communist past.
The Eastern European and Mediterranean countries had to introduce major economic reforms and adopt thousands of pages of EU laws and regulations before entry into the EU (BBC News, 2000). For instance, Poland and Hungary, along with the other states, had to implement thousands of EU laws, treaties, and regulations over the preceding decade. This paper discusses these requirements from the perspectives of the original EU members, the new members, and a variety of outside nations, particularly the United States.
According to Radek Sikorski, director of the New Atlantic Initiative at the American Enterprise Institute and a former deputy foreign and defense minister of Poland (Golino, 2003): "The inclusion of countries that were isolated, impoverished, and politically transformed by half a century of Nazi and communist totalitarianism will change Europe — economically, politically and above all culturally — in ways its politicians have not yet begun to comprehend."
The new members had been implementing EU-required changes for many years prior to accession. For example, Poland agreed to hire thousands more border guards and tighten immigration controls before joining the European Union (Lungescua, 2002). These commitments allowed it to negotiate with the EU, which was wary of Polish entry due to the sensitive issue of justice and home affairs.
The original members of the EU worried that eastward expansion would bring more illegal immigrants and higher crime levels. To reassure them, Poland — the largest candidate country — agreed to hire more than 5,000 border guards by 2006, 50% of whom had already been hired at the time of writing. These guards replaced conscripts who had been patrolling Poland's 1,200-kilometre (745-mile) border with Ukraine, Russia, and Belarus.
Poland also agreed to build new border stations and purchase modern equipment such as helicopters (Lungescua, 2002). In addition, to meet EU requirements, Poland implemented a visa requirement for Russians, Ukrainians, and Belarusians. Poland insisted, however, that it did not intend to make life difficult for its neighbors and pledged to keep visa fees low.
Economically, candidate countries had to convince the EU that they had a "functioning market economy" and that their economies could withstand the competitive pressures of EU membership (Orla, 2000). Politically, they had to demonstrate a functioning democracy with respect for human rights and minorities.
To fulfill the criteria for accession to the EU, the candidate countries adapted their legislation to EU laws and regulations for years, particularly regarding the free movement of goods, free movement of capital, company law, competition policy, taxation, industrial policy, and more (World Tariff Online Database, 2002).
The newly acceding countries took great measures to restructure their economies, especially through privatization, which made the private sector the key driver of growth. Financial intermediation also increased, and the eastern countries developed a more stable banking sector. This transformation and restructuring strengthened business confidence and economic efficiency. As a result, these countries enjoyed greater business investment, which became a further stimulus to growth. Many of these countries registered economic growth well above the EU average during 1997–2001.
The economies of the candidate countries also benefited from the entry of foreign capital, driven not only by lower production costs but also by a liberalizing investment environment and strong trading prospects associated with their EU accession (World Tariff Online Database, 2002). Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary were the largest destinations for foreign direct investment. In 2001, foreign direct investment inflows into these three countries amounted to US$8.8 billion, US$4.9 billion, and US$2.4 billion, respectively. Germany, the Netherlands, and France were the major foreign investors, with targeted sectors including financial services, transport, construction, energy, and manufacturing.
The new enlargement of the EU also affected Europe's citizens. The event changed the daily lives of the 454 million individuals in the now 25-nation bloc in many ways. The following summarizes key changes since the new countries joined the EU (European Union Business, 2004):
Free Circulation: EU citizens need identity cards, but no longer passports, to travel between the 10 new states and the 15 old ones. Border officials would, however, continue stopping people at the frontiers of the 10 new states, as these would not be open for free passage under EU rules before 2007.
Work in Other Countries: Citizens of the new member states were still not free to work without a permit in Western Europe, because most of the old member states — except for Britain, Ireland, and Sweden — imposed restrictions for a transition period of up to seven years.
Prices: New member states must maintain the same customs duties and value-added tax as the old members. Countries that had eliminated customs duties, such as Estonia, were expected to experience price increases. In Estonia, for example, sugar that had been duty-free would become twice as expensive. Textiles imported from China and India would also become more expensive for the new member states. In the Czech Republic, however, Japanese and U.S. motorcycles would become cheaper because customs duties would be lower.
Real Estate: Restrictions on foreigners purchasing real estate were expected to remain until 2009.
Euro: The new members would have to wait until at least 2007 before they could adopt the European single currency. Upon accession, the new members had a minimum of two years — during which they would be members of the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) — before they could sign up to European Monetary Union (EMU).
Experts noted that accession was a historic achievement not just for the new members and Europe, but also for other nations, particularly the United States. A unified European continent had long been a goal of American policy, pursued by every American administration since that of President Harry S. Truman. Many of the EU's new members were also close allies of the U.S. — for instance, Poland was supporting the U.S. mission in Iraq by commanding a multinational division deployed to the south-central region of the country.
You’re 29% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 4 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.